That's how you have attempted to frame the conversation. The accurate portrayal is Trump has committed impeachable offenses and therefore should be held accountable through the impeachment process.
You have attempted to say that impeachment would hurt dems with voters - - it hasn't.
You've then attempted this second argument saying, well it hasn't helped, but that wasn't your initial claim. I would also like to note you've run two permutations of this argument - - one saying dem voters in the midwest don't care (while Ignoring data that shows dem support has grown for impeachment) and the other to say we'll Republicans don't care (despite data showing that independents have increased their support for impeachment).
That argument comes across as either premature or concern trolling for two reasons. One, I mentioned previously, that impeachment is about holding the president accountable through the methods outlined in the constitution and not as a mere exercise in populism. Secondly, your argument ignores historical data of when public opinion changed regarding the impeachment of Nixon and Clinton.
We haven't reached the point of hearing for Trump and they're still waiting on a few court decisions that will have a large affect on how those hearings go and how much of a defense Trump can put up.
With Clinton, he remained popular largely because he was always extremely popular and hiding an affair never really rose to the bar to shift public opinion.
Still, in 2000 Republicans took control of the White House.
People chastise you because you don't know what's going to happen so when you and
@Frank Grimes pretend like you do everyone knows you're being dishonest.