Trump IMPEACHED by the US House; US Senate Trial Allows No New Witnesses & Acquits Trump

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
88,298
Reputation
3,626
Daps
157,417
Reppin
Brooklyn
The Hill
8 hrs ·
BREAKING: The White House just announced it is canceling subscriptions to The New York Times and The Washington Post less than a day after President Trump suggesting terminating them.


About this website

THEHILL.COM

White House to cancel subscriptions to New York Times, Washington Post after Trump remarks
“We don’t even want it in the White House anymore,” Trump told Fox News’s Sean Hannity during an interview that aired Monday night, referring to the Times. “We’re going to probably terminate that and The Washington Post. They’re fake.”
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
5,992
Daps
132,714
He will serve time. And anyone who pardons him should be impeached.
I definitely don't think he'll serve time. The powers that be in the establishment won't let that happen for reasons of social relations and avoiding civil unrest. 30-40% stand by him like a cult leader. I don't think they're gonna let a president with that large a passionate and crazy base rot away in jail. Ford pardoned Nixon. Obama didn't investigate Bush for torture.
 

bzb

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
3,910
Reputation
2,524
Daps
21,796
it should be forgone the dems will impeach at this point. he's earned it twice over, at least. they'll cross t's and dot i's before sending it to the senate, but that's when fukkery probably goes into overdrive. the senate or cheeto's lawyers/doj may try to stall a trial under the premise of "letting the voters decide". basically the same bs bytch mcconnell pulled with obama's sc pick.

regardless of what happens the dems better keep running up the score. his track record shows every time he gets away with something he does something even worse the next time. rethugs know this guy is out of control and eventually he's going to break something they can't cover up or fix. they probably want him out the paint too, but only if it doesn't cost their own necks. hanging on until the election and him losing is their best play. dems better beat them to a pulp with the steady stream of corruption and abuse being exposed on this clown.
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

Drink wolf cola
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
31,801
Reputation
9,651
Daps
107,025
Reppin
Brooklyn
@Mantis Toboggan M.D. i think we need to give nap a rest and give that WOAT trophy to someone else this year breh:mjlol:
At this point he’s passed even swagnificent in the coliseum. He’s a paid agent/shill who’s here to spread disinformation and propaganda. If we can’t ban him, let’s name the trophy after him. He’s got more WOAT badges than any other poster, he’s one of only two guys to win it in multiple forums in the same year, and he’s also the only guy to win multiple times in multiple forums. At this point half the section has him on ignore. Makes sense to give someone else the dishonor.
 

Arithmetic

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Mar 6, 2015
Messages
49,609
Reputation
14,552
Daps
263,083
Ok I read the full opening statement and it is extremely detailed to the point he has direct quotes listed for conversations he had months ago with multiple individuals. Ummmmm, that probably means brehs...

He has FUKKERY RECEIPTS :wow:

Could this American Hero have the smoking gun phone calls recorded??

Ummmmm I think so brehs :blessed:
It also means at the very least that Sondland wasn't candid in his hearing, if he didn't completely perjure himself.
 

Arithmetic

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Mar 6, 2015
Messages
49,609
Reputation
14,552
Daps
263,083
What's so pathetic about it?

Two things here
1) POTUS right to make demands of a foreign country, he is the executive of the country. That part is probably not an issue, unless.

2) Then there is POTUS investigating his potential presidential opponent that has officially declared he is running, by making demands from a foreign country.
  • That part could be impeachable.
  • Tricky in the sense too that candidates always investigate one another.
  • So then is it using the power of the position the problem? If Trump had hired a private investigator to look into Biden's Ukraine situation on behalf of his campaign, using campaign money, is that an impeachable offense or just politics? :patrice:

My main question is would it have been potentially impeachable to make that same demand of Ukraine before Biden officially declared his was running?

If anyone would like to respond to my questions let me know your viewpoint. :jbhmm:
The conduct amounts to high crimes. That's irrespective of Biden's (non)candidate label.
 

Spatial Paradox

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
2,291
Reputation
1,120
Daps
12,156
Reppin
Brooklyn
I definitely don't think he'll serve time. The powers that be in the establishment won't let that happen for reasons of social relations and avoiding civil unrest. 30-40% stand by him like a cult leader. I don't think they're gonna let a president with that large a passionate and crazy base rot away in jail. Ford pardoned Nixon. Obama didn't investigate Bush for torture.

American history is filled with moments where we preferred to "move on from the past" rather than confronting it to make sure we don't repeat the same mistake or let the problems that arise from them fester.
 
Top