Trump IMPEACHED by the US House; US Senate Trial Allows No New Witnesses & Acquits Trump
- Thread starter Arithmetic
- Start date
Back in 2016 I simply scammed into place
Russia, Russia, Russia all up in yo face
A lotta Dems threaten fines but I won the race
Some said I'm a cheat, but I still beat the case.
So Hannity come in wit The Sugar Cuts/Trump Dawg is my Name but at The Rally call me Orange Mutt
It's obvious both of you are taking this position because you want 2020 to be a referedum on the Democratic party and not Trump, the GOP, and their corruption and fascism.
:PatriceTrump:
:PatriceTrump:
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
Except I didn’t say it wasn’t a better political decision than doing nothing. On that note, I’m done talking to you for now. I just don’t have a lot of patience for lack of reading comprehension and accusations of ulterior motives because you don’t like my honest assessment of the situation.
You said it's not a win. In no way shape or form is the democratic party doing what their constituents want them to classifies as "not a win."
But I'm glad you don't want to go back and forth because your current position is a bad one.
Wrong thread
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
I don’t even know what process in your head leads you to concocting these bad faith conclusions, but for whatever reason you have some issue going on that is preventing you from accepting the face value truth that some people do not believe the impeachment process will hurt Trump politically, and it might even end up helping him.
You and everyone in this thread agreeing with your drivel are the equivalent of the sports fan who gets mad at fellow fans of the same team for giving an honest opinion that they don’t think their team will win a big game.
That’s how you sound with these silly accusations of ulterior motives of wanting Trump to win, or wanting Dems to lose more than Trump.
Last edited:
:ALERTRED:
Trump told Theresa May he doubted Russia was behind Skripal poisoning
Trump told Theresa May he doubted Russia was behind Skripal poisoning
The US president reportedly disputed UK’s ‘overwhelming evidence’ of Russian involvement in Salisbury attack
Michael SavageLast modified on Sat 5 Oct 2019 14.32 EDT
The two Russian agents, Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov, identified as the likely culprits in the attack on the Skripals, in a still from CCTV footage.
Photograph: Metropolitan Police/PA
Donald Trump disputed that Russia was behind the attempted murder of a former Russian spy in a tense call with Theresa May, it has emerged.
Despite the widespread conclusion that Vladimir Putin’s regime was behind the poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia last year, the US president is said to have spent 10 minutes expressing his doubts about Russian involvement.
According to the Washington Post, Trump “harangued” May about Britain’s contribution to Nato in a phone call with Britain’s then prime minister in the summer of last year, before disputing Russian involvement in the Skripal case.
“Trump totally bought into the idea there was credible doubt about the poisoning,” said a figure briefed on the call. “A solid 10 minutes of the conversation is spent with May saying it’s highly likely and him saying he’s not sure.”
The Skripals were left fighting for their lives after the novichok attack in Salisbury, while a policeman was also left seriously ill. A second policeman was recently discovered to have been injured in the attack.
Two Russian agents, Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov, were identified as the likely culprits. However, they later appeared on Russia’s state-funded TV station RT, claiming they visited the “wonderful” English city as tourists to see its cathedral.
Trump has been pursued over his relationship with Russia ever since allegations emerged that the country colluded with the Trump presidential campaign in 2016. The Robert Mueller report, which examined the claims, concluded Russia had been attempting to swing the presidential election in favour of Trump, but did not say whether there had been collusion.
Stephen Gethins, a Scottish National party member of the foreign affairs select committee, said: “The evidence of Russian involvement in the poisoning of Mr Skripal and his daughter is overwhelming. It was an appalling chemical weapons attack that should horrify us all.
“What is just as worrying is that Boris Johnson wants to align the UK closer to Donald Trump with his discredited foreign policy. Our closest foreign policy partners are and should remain those in the EU. We need to work with our partners in Europe to stand up to Putin’s bullying of Russia’s neighbours as well as attacks on human rights and democracy activists domestically.”
At the time of the Skripal poisoning, Jeremy Corbyn caused a backlash among his own MPs after appearing to question the evidence that Moscow was behind the Salisbury attack. Corbyn warned that the government should not be “rushing way ahead of the evidence” over the poisoning and warned of a drift towards a “new cold war” with Russia.
@88m3 @ADevilYouKhow @wire28 @dtownreppin214
@dza @wire28 @BigMoneyGrip @Dameon Farrow @re'up @Blackfyre @NY's #1 Draft Pick @Skyfall @2Quik4UHoes
Why is a Wisconsin senator talking like this? South Carolina I can understand, but Wisconsin is a purple state. Johnson might be an asset as well. Feingold taking a L to this dikkhead as an incumbent still pisses me off.
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
They will all coalesce around the Trump narrative eventually. We’re watching it happen now.
Time will pass and they will normalize it like everything else he does.
Do they realize more is coming? I would not be surprised if there's a half a dozen whistleblowers by the end of the year. They are going to look incredibly foolish juelzing every time more evidence gets released.