The director has just acknowledged that it was in reference to the relationship with her father. He specifically says this -The fact you cant find one ounce of proof behind your stance,and the fact the director doesnt even remember it being in the scene is proof that it meant NOTHING and was nothing more than a red herring.
If it meant something,they would remember it and acknowledge it. They dont. Because its not a theme. Its a red herring.
"I read Audrey’s behavior as being the direct result of an inattentive father. Seeking male attention in other places, or even seeking to get into trouble, perhaps, to get the attention of her father; it was not related to the killings or anyone around them"
Get your head out of the sand. He said it wasn't related to the killings, so how could it possibly be a red herring? I think you need to do some investigative work of your own into what a theme and red herring is.
All this shows is that you can't think for yourself unless someone spells it out for you.All this shows is how desperate you are to make a point here,when you have none.