I get that. What I'm saying and you can call any lawyers office and ask them. It is not smart to go out in public and give away your defense strategyThe burden is on the prosecution bro, the defense is not bound to any statements they make prior to trial, to the extent that the prosecution is. If anything, in many high profile cases the defense tries to influence the jury before jury selection has even started by making statements before trial.
It's the prosecution who brings forth the charges, the defense can modify theories much more easily than the prosecution.
Ding ding ding ding dingHe's not laying out his case months/years before trial, what he's doing is trying to change the narrative, or offer a different theory that the police has put out. Potential Jurors were given a narrative and visual of a reckless act without context. His lawyer is saying hey lets put some context to this act, here's our theory. This theory also makes the police go back to the drawing board and investigate based on the Defense theory so they want be blind sided in court.
Can someone provide the cliffs of the last couple days, I don't wanna read through all the bullshyt. What are they saying happened?
rep + dap
Why didn't they turn ojs glove inside out and test for DNA?Ding ding ding ding ding
That was my entire point from jump breh and I'm glad you said it
Why in the holy fukk would I want the police to help the prosecution to NOT be blindsided? I want to blindside the fukk out these nikkas so they left looking stupid in court
Just like Cochran did. If he came out early and offered up his theory. That the police set him up. The prosecution would coach their witness and vet their witnesses to make sure no one like furhman got up there
but they didn't plan for that theory. They didn't pick the jury on that theory. They let the case be moved out of lily white ville. And got blindsided in the end, left looking foolish.
Cause he didn't do itWhy didn't they turn ojs glove inside out and test for DNA?
DNA was in it's infancy, only certain type of test were done.Why didn't they turn ojs glove inside out and test for DNA?
He's not laying out his case months/years before trial, what he's doing is trying to change the narrative,(same shyt i said yesterday btw) or offer a different theory that the police has put out. Potential Jurors were given a narrative and visual of a reckless act without context. His lawyer is saying hey lets put some context to this act, here's our theory. This theory also makes the police go back to the drawing board and investigate based on the Defense theory so they want be blind sided in court.
I get that. What I'm saying and you can call any lawyers office and ask them. It is not smart to go out in public and give away your defense strategy
so in less than 48 hours this nikka has reversed , did a 180 on what a top notch lawyer should do for high profile clients these coli nikkas man, can't even properly flip a burger to go 180 but they tryna tell another man that gets paid $300-$400 an hour how to do his jobno... you are NEVER supposed to go in the public and start speaking
man.. will shut the fukk up already..earlier tho
so in less than 48 hours this nikka has reversed , did a 180 on what a top notch lawyer should do for high profile clients these coli nikkas man, can't even properly flip a burger to go 180 but they tryna tell another man that gets paid $300-$400 an hour how to do his job
You are the dumbest nikka in here if you not some sheltered white boyearlier tho
so in less than 48 hours this nikka has reversed , did a 180 on what a top notch lawyer should do for high profile clients these coli nikkas man, can't even properly flip a burger to go 180 but they tryna tell another man that gets paid $300-$400 an hour how to do his job
I didn't even say half of that you fukking clownThe nikka @The Devil's Advocate moved the goal post, first he said "no good defense attorney will make statements before the trial" then he said "na i meant they won't make statements during pre-trial", now its "na they won't outline their strategy before the trial"
which one is it nikka
(and yes of course a lawyer won't tell their whole strategy before the trial, that is common sense.)