This "burial" thing is a bit strong. I mean the Goldberg thing was DEFINITELY a burial. Booker may have been due to the build up. The rest though, seems like a heel going over.
Brehs, Dustin Rhodes, Erik Watts, Jeff Jarrett, Greg Gagne and Brian Lawler were all guys pushed by their fathers, I don't understand why HHH is so different. Is it because it happened in a time where we all know wrestling terminology? Or maybe because the WWE is a much larger scale? Idk but the way I see it is he did what he was told with some input due to his power. Yes his reigns were tedious but let's not act like he did all of this without Vince McMahon knowledge or blessing.
Paul Levesque is really only a cut or two above Miz in terms of actual main event believability but he was a great classic heel so it worked. Maybe we were just mad because he did his job right?
The heel has to be booked strong so when the conquering face goes over he looks like a superhero. Granted he didn't make too many new main event stars in that time but its good he didn't. If he had he would look like Jericho right now where if you beat him it doesn't look like a huge deal. Its all a work... its a fukking work
HHH is nowhere near as good as he thinks he is but in the long run he was a heel we DESPERATELY wanted to see lose. Wether we like it or not, dude was last of a dying breed
![manny :manny: :manny:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/manny.png)