Yea, I would have been less of a douche if I knew. I didn’t know son was from SOHH days.damn I didnt realize that was you
Yea, I would have been less of a douche if I knew. I didn’t know son was from SOHH days.damn I didnt realize that was you
Oh shyt!!! Soon as I read the name... Hell yea.. shyt I don't even remember my SOHH name. It wasn't the same as here and this one changed too after I got to the coli. But I definitely remember your long ass username lol.
It's really crazy but some of us been talking to each other for decades on these two forums.
The biggest thing is when you have an idiot coach calling the plays. There would have been no OT in the first place.Even if the team wasn’t prepped on the overtime rules and thought a td would win the game they still failed by not getting 6. The biggest mistake was settling for a fg with 4 yards to go against Patrick Mahomes. Would have been funny to see them running around thinkin they won the game after getting a td tho
Thanks, now I can at least understand the logic behind receiving second.A lot of people giving explanations but here's the facts, with no teams involved...
You ALWAYS kick in college style (both teams get the ball) type of OT.
If you get the ball and score a TD, the other team gets the ball next... They KNOW they have to score a TD to tie, so every series is 4 downs. They KNOW if they score a TD, they can win with a 2 point.. If you only score a FG, they now have choices whether to kick to tie, or go all in to win... If you do nothing, all they have to do is kick the fg to win.
The ONLY advantage you have by going first is if both teams match scores, you now have the ball again with only a FG to win
But if you kick... You get to let them make all those decisions and simply get the ball needing to tie or outscore them. You have no decisions to make. You going all in, all the way, and you will never even attempt to run a scheme for 3 downs.. Everything is 4. So you playing with more downs cause punting isn't an option anymore.
Your ONLY disadvantage is if they score and you score then they score, they win...
So really.... Why choose the thing where you need 2 scores to happen before your advantage kicks in? While the other option gives the advantage soon as you get the ball? That's why NOBODY in college asks for the ball first... Except Deion
The defense did what they couldThe biggest thing is when you have an idiot coach calling the plays. There would have been no OT in the first place.
None of this shyt would have mattered if he ran the ball with ALL THREE RBS. Defense sacked Mahommes what 3 or 4 times? The Defense got 2 turnovers. Then the idiot is talking about he going to discuss if Wilks will be back next season.
A so called offensive genius 0-3 in the Super Bowl. You can't make this shyt up. This was the weakest KC team offensively since Pat has been there and still couldn't get it done with a star studded team. Eddie D would have Marc Trestmaned that Elf eared hack fakkit back in 2020.
The crazy part you still have idiots taking up for Marv. You can always tell the people that never played football though.
Even then. Take it second. Least if they do score a TD. You then know you have to score a TD and probably go for 2 since your defense cant stop mahomes.You send them out there first and they are getting sliced the fukk up by Mahomes, I truly don't see them scoring a FG or punting unless a turnover happened.
Y'all Eagles fans still ain't learned to hush, huh? The only folks who can talk cash money to us are Chiefs fans or Ravens fans.
I'm fine with saying we got some shyt to deal with, but your head coach can't even run an offense and hired the guy who's been fired multiple times for being peak mediocrity as an OC. I'm almost positive Steichen was y'all actual HC when he was there while Sirianni got to cry on the sideline for clout.
x.com
x.com
Holy shyt!!!!
All you can do is laugh at this point
so they had an illegal man down field too?