And that difference is what exactly?
Meek mill has a black mother
Levels
And that difference is what exactly?
:biglol:
i wouldnt be surprised if he swagger jack some other lesser known Bay Area artist.Aubrey biting The Bay again?
what happen with that situation wasnt 4-tay suppose to sue?bit rappin 4 tay, that weak ass ode to the bay (sound) "the motto"...
If he was a B/C tier rapper half of this shyt wouldn't come to light though, so it goes both ways.
what happen with that situation wasnt 4-tay suppose to sue?
what happen with that situation wasnt 4-tay suppose to sue?
i wouldnt be surprised if he swagger jack some other lesser known Bay Area artist.
I understand he appeal to certain members on here ,but keeping it a buck : dude is corny to me.
Rappers been lifting flows/lyrics/stanzas/melodies directly from other rappers and songs point blank since the dawn of time.
shyt is legit silly to act like its a sin, especially when original content from them outweighs "paying homage" 10:1
people have been interpolating melodies, stanzas, and lyrics from other songs for forever. i'm at work so i won't list a whole bunch of shyt, but off top "industry rule #4080...", "now here's a little story i got to tell"...biting goes beyond simply borrowing lyrics. biting, the biting that gets you in trouble, is Master P - jacking people's style of music, sound, image, making the same type of song they made, etc. Nothing wrong with starting off a song with a few bars from short when the whole fukking song is built on a slowed down "blow the whistle" that's clearly paying homage. This shyt can be traced back to melodies/lyrics stolen from 70's/80's r&b/soul/pop songs where rapper repurpose the melody or words. It's not biting to use a lyric or a few bars and moving on...it's a nod to the real fans who can quote that shyt and know where it's from.
NO, THEY HAVE NOT.
Up until the 2000s and Jay-Z's introduction of the concept of "paying homage", biting was prohibited in rap and would get you ostracized. NOBODY can dispute that biting was always frowned upon in rap, this "beginning of time" narrative is just maddeningly silly.
Please don't buy into that whole narrative change, @dora_da_destroyer . It's factually and patently false and its the ONLY narrative left for some of these Drake stans to cling to....
1) Widespread practice of an abhorrent tenet DOES NOT automatically equate with acceptance of it....and a segment of the culture supporting it doesn't mean the ENTIRE culture supports it.
2) People ASSUME that others know it's "paying homage"....half thesee young dudes think artists from last YEAR are irrelevant in this throwaway ass culture, it's wrong to assume they KNOW where a lyric originally came from, even if it's only been a FEW years....let's not forget how Missy Elliott of all people was trending on Twitter after that Super Bowl performance with Katy Perry, which had young cats saying things like "whoever this is is going to be famous tomorrow"....
The Motto was dope and who else in rap was putting on for Mac Drey
For Free is obviously a concept song and the Too short lyrics further the concept
Why do people only care when Drake mixes some famous lyrics into his raps?
Cole Does it to a point where it's OD and no one says a thing
Meek had a record using Biggie lyrics and flow
And that difference is what exactly?
Ehhh why doesn't Meek get called out for it?
Why doesn't J Cole?
nikkaz Know
In the morning
Enchanted
That's just off the top of my head
Jay and Drake get criticized for doing less than what Meek did in that song
Jay and Drake get criticized for using flows all the time
Flow and lyrics are interchangeable with my larger point
You get paid for this shyt?Now you're moving goal post
Let's unpack this.....people have been interpolating melodies, stanzas, and lyrics from other songs for forever. i'm at work so i won't list a whole bunch of shyt, but off top "industry rule #4080...", "now here's a little story i got to tell"...biting goes beyond simply borrowing lyrics. biting, the biting that gets you in trouble, is Master P - jacking people's style of music, sound, image, making the same type of song they made, etc. Nothing wrong with starting off a song with a few bars from short when the whole fukking song is built on a slowed down "blow the whistle" that's clearly paying homage. This shyt can be traced back to melodies/lyrics stolen from 70's/80's r&b/soul/pop songs where rapper repurpose the melody or words. It's not biting to use a lyric or a few bars and moving on...it's a nod to the real fans who can quote that shyt and know where it's from.
1) see the difference between true biting and dropping a few bars from an existing song...
bruh, who gives a fukk. this is not the artist's plight, it's on listeners to know the music/have broader exposure or simply learn the soure via WOM or the internet. there have been plenty of songs i didn't know used lyrics, was a remake, or sampled a beat, and somehow i found out the source material down the line. it's like, "oh" and back to the version i fukk with.
there's no rule saying that person would've been a fan of the original artist, there are no rules that say you have to like the original better. knowing who said it/made it first doesn't change your reaction to the remake. i remember the tinashe thread on here and someone didn't know she basically covered "funny how time flies" by janet...a song that was pretty damn popular and is in regular rotation during any urban station's slow jam hour. nothing abhorrent about tinashe using that song, that's the fault of dumbasses who don't know shyt about music as well as it's simply part of the game, things get forgotten over time and brought back to life
The video I posted came out 2 months before The Motto was released