Tom's Hardware: Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 sucks up to 180 Mb/s of internet bandwidth while in flight — equivalent to 81GB of data per hour

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,055
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,869
Reppin
Tha Land
ZqdbxV5.gif


:damn:
You changed @Insensitive name cause you know he’s not an xbox stan.

Also

Seems things turned out the way reasonable people said they would.

It’s been you scrambling to find a story since the online poster named TF filled you with lies.


So one more fukkin time post ANYONE saying 13tf would afford xbox a HUGE advantage over PS5.

Just one post.
 

itsyoung!!

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,925
Reputation
6,592
Daps
108,753
Reppin
Bay Area
Listen, I know you are broke, single and basically homeless if your parents kick you out but showing side by side comparisons arent always a good indicator of performance possibilities because whoever did the xbox version could of just optimized the game bad.

Example: Battlefront ran poorly on pcs until it was patched. That has nothing to do with the power of PCs. Thats EA being horrible at optimizing games.
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
31,960
Reputation
2,692
Daps
44,038
Dazed is pc gang.. this how retarded sony stans are and why posters starting to call yall MAGA like. Just cause someone brings up some rational thought in a thread yall think they an xbot

Im not even sure dazed even owns a xbox
idk who "dazed" is, but I don't own an Xbox, and Flight Simulator is a PC game that happens to be on console

it should be obvious that a highly detailed map of the whole world takes a lot of data. it wouldn't be realistic to store it locally. and there's no point of having a bunch of local data for places you have no intention of flying over. so the game streams the data for whatever you're flying over. this data is cached, so you won't have to keep downloading it. and there's options to choose your cache size, texture quality, etc.
 

Bubba T

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
8,563
Reputation
2,569
Daps
54,738
Comcast salivating at all the overage fees they about to charge nikkas
 

itsyoung!!

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,925
Reputation
6,592
Daps
108,753
Reppin
Bay Area
idk who "dazed" is, but I don't own an Xbox, and Flight Simulator is a PC game that happens to be on console

it should be obvious that a highly detailed map of the whole world takes a lot of data. it wouldn't be realistic to store it locally. and there's no point of having a bunch of local data for places you have no intention of flying over. so the game streams the data for whatever you're flying over. this data is cached, so you won't have to keep downloading it. and there's options to choose your cache size, texture quality, etc.
Theres a Wifi 7 joke some where in here :pachaha:
 

L@CaT

For Hire Gunslinger!
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
15,589
Reputation
-745
Daps
27,045
When facts/context is viewed as “defense” it only shows how unserious you clowns are in the first place.

I’m sure no one in this thread has a BW cap, nor will you play this game, but alas here we are.

Where is @L@CaT to complain about stan’s talking shyt in threads when we need him :patrice:
Xbot Stans :noah:
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
20,871
Reputation
9,952
Daps
119,082
Hol up

I have to be online to play this? :gucci:

Maaaaaan FOH with that bullshyt if true.
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
60,416
Reputation
7,938
Daps
110,625
You changed @Insensitive name cause you know he’s not an xbox stan.

Also

Seems things turned out the way reasonable people said they would.

It’s been you scrambling to find a story since the online poster named TF filled you with lies.


So one more fukkin time post ANYONE saying 13tf would afford xbox a HUGE advantage over PS5.

Just one post.
No, I changed his name because I didn't feel like arguing with anyone else.
Again, the post I quoted was him
This will genuinely impact it's performance and it could be huge in real world performance.
On paper X1X should only be 30% better than Pro but because it's various disadvantages
there are times where X1X performs 50% to 70% better than Pro on average.
That was literally the idea that the Series X would be KILLING the PS5 in head to head differences.

The only "reasonable" take was mines which was that the differences would be negligible and that most games would perform mostly the same with some shockingly performing better on PS5. :ufdup:

You nasty stans love to distort reality.

Xbox fukking stans :wow:
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,055
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,869
Reppin
Tha Land
No, I changed his name because I didn't feel like arguing with anyone else.
Again, the post I quoted was him
I thought you wanted all the smoke tho? :patrice:
That was literally the idea that the Series X would be KILLING the PS5 in head to head differences.
You realize a 30% GPU performance increase only results in a few FPS?

You also realize most games have a few FPS improvement on xbox
The only "reasonable" take was mines which was that the differences would be negligible and that most games would perform mostly the same with some shockingly performing better on PS5. :ufdup:

You nasty stans love to distort reality.

Xbox fukking stans :wow:
Breh you literally had to retitle your own thread “Fatbo1 lost”

I ain’t distorting shyt :hubie:
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
60,416
Reputation
7,938
Daps
110,625
I thought you wanted all the smoke tho? :patrice:

You realize a 30% GPU performance increase only results in a few FPS?

You also realize most games have a few FPS improvement on xbox

Breh you literally had to retitle your own thread “Fatbo1 lost”

I ain’t distorting shyt :hubie:
This will genuinely impact it's performance and it could be huge in real world performance.

Go argue with ya boy not me.
 
Top