TLR VOTING POLL: If It Came To Donald J. Trump Vs Hillary Clinton Who Would You Vote For?

[cam>]

how can you even stand the stench of hillarys corruption then add her abysmal performance as secretary of state....she set fire to the whole North Africa and at least 4 other countries...how many more will she do as a president

Given the choice between a woman with a political career spanning over 40 years, with a solid record in legislative government, years served on the executive, allies throughout government that she can whip to pass policy, one who presents a feasible and specific platform, who actually understands how politics in America work...

and

a man that has presented no feasible policy, is stupefyingly clueless on domestic and foreign structures and protocol, and is an ardent racist...

fam....You'd have to be out of ya mind to go with Trump.

It is what it is with Hilary. She isn't as progressive as I'd like, and her husband's legacy was disastrous for Black folks, but good God, she's at least experienced and ready for such a role.

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

Given the choice between a woman with a political career spanning over 40 years, with a solid record in legislative government, years served on the executive, allies throughout government that she can whip to pass policy, one who presents a feasible and specific platform, who actually understands how politics in America work...

and

a man that has presented no feasible policy, is stupefyingly clueless on domestic and foreign structures and protocol, and is an ardent racist...

fam....You'd have to be out of ya mind to go with Trump.

It is what it is with Hilary. She isn't as progressive as I'd like, and her husband's legacy was disastrous for Black folks, but good God, she's at least experienced and ready for such a role.

Name one "solid" achievement of hers within those 40 years? ill wait...(you shouldnt have to google this but go ahead and try)

I can name 20 major scandals with her name in them...you say experience but in what?What has she done other than raise huge sums of money??

All you say about trump is condensed into one word..UNKNOWN..nobody knows what he will do or even be able to do given his partys tepid support
But if i had to pick between a verified corrupt warmonger and an unknown..ill take my chances with the unknown

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Name one "solid" achievement of hers within those 40 years? ill wait...(you shouldnt have to google this but go ahead and try)

I can name 20 major scandals with her name in them...you say experience but in what?What has she done other than raise huge sums of money??

All you say about trump is condensed into one word..UNKNOWN..nobody knows what he will do or even be able to do given his partys tepid support
But if i had to pick between a verified corrupt warmonger and an unknown..ill take my chances with the unknown

CHIP

The rest of your garbage is just that. Some of y'all really fail at critical thinking.

 

[SirReginald]

Given the choice between a woman with a political career spanning over 40 years, with a solid record in legislative government, years served on the executive, allies throughout government that she can whip to pass policy, one who presents a feasible and specific platform, who actually understands how politics in America work...

and

a man that has presented no feasible policy, is stupefyingly clueless on domestic and foreign structures and protocol, and is an ardent racist...

fam....You'd have to be out of ya mind to go with Trump.

It is what it is with Hilary. She isn't as progressive as I'd like, and her husband's legacy was disastrous for Black folks, but good God, she's at least experienced and ready for such a role.

While that may be true she is the corporate politicians. Atleast with Trump he won't let these special interest people get in the way. I somewhat agree with Trump on economics and trade policy and Anti-TPP. Sorry, but I'll never vote for a woman who breached national security I think people who are voting for Clinton are naive. While Trump is NOT my ideal candidate he's best for the job. Clinton SUCKED as Secretary Of State and as NY Senator her track-record isn't all that. Hell, she voted for the Iraqi war.

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

CHIP

The rest of your garbage is just that. Some of y'all really fail at critical thinking.

Fall back...the first part of critical thinking is analysis

The late-Sen. Kennedy received much of the credit for CHIP because the Massachusetts Democrat shepherded the legislation through a Republican-controlled Congress. Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch was the lead Republican co-sponsor.

Yet, in 2007, Kennedy told the Associated Press that Hillary Clinton played a critical role.

"The children's health program wouldn't be in existence today if we didn't have Hillary pushing for it from the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue," Kennedy said.

Nick Littlefield, a senior health adviser to Kennedy at the time, agreed.

"She wasn't a legislator, she didn't write the law, and she wasn't the president, so she didn't make the decisions," Littlefield told the Associated Press. "But we relied on her, worked with her and she was pivotal in encouraging the White House to do it.

in 40 years all she did is "encourage"

 

[MewTwo]

Given the choice between a woman with a political career spanning over 40 years, with a solid record in legislative government, years served on the executive, allies throughout government that she can whip to pass policy, one who presents a feasible and specific platform, who actually understands how politics in America work...

and

a man that has presented no feasible policy, is stupefyingly clueless on domestic and foreign structures and protocol, and is an ardent racist...

fam....You'd have to be out of ya mind to go with Trump.

It is what it is with Hilary. She isn't as progressive as I'd like, and her husband's legacy was disastrous for Black folks, but good God, she's at least experienced and ready for such a role.

What does being 'experienced' actually mean here? Being a politician isn't rocket science. Politicians are professional liars. Politicians are corporate puppets. We should glorify someone because they're experienced at being a liar? because they're experienced at being a fukking puppet?

Trump is a billionaire property developer. At least he has accomplished something.

 

[SirReginald]

Remember, the President has CONTROL of the NUCLEAR CODES Yes NUCLEAR CODES

 

[cam>]

Name one "solid" achievement of hers within those 40 years? ill wait...(you shouldnt have to google this but go ahead and try)

I can name 20 major scandals with her name in them...you say experience but in what?What has she done other than raise huge sums of money??

All you say about trump is condensed into one word..UNKNOWN..nobody knows what he will do or even be able to do given his partys tepid support
But if i had to pick between a verified corrupt warmonger and an unknown..ill take my chances with the unknown

What's your race/ethnicity (and income group)?

You have a gripe with "special interests" so I'm wondering if you're a POC and don't understand that you fall into that category, or if you're a white male threatened by the political power of folks in that category.

 

[SirReginald]

Also, "The Clinton Foundation" is a money-laundering scheme to make The Clinton's more wealthier. Face it, these Clintons can't be trusted.

 

[MewTwo]

 

[cam>]

What does being 'experienced' actually mean here? Being a politician isn't rocket science. Politicians are professional liars. Politicians are corporate puppets. We should glorify someone because they're experienced at being a liar? because they're experienced at being a fukking puppet?

Trump is a billionaire property developer. At least he has accomplished something.

LOL!

This is a parody account of a 12 year old, right?

I'm surprised the word "politricks" wasn't used.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Fall back...the first part of critical thinking is analysis


in 40 years all she did is "encourage"

Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Oct. 6, 2007: The children’s health program wouldn’t be in existence today if we didn’t have Hillary pushing for it from the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue.

Washington Times, Aug. 6, 1997: The plan signed into law yesterday by Mr. Clinton and pushed by the first lady is a duplicate of the 4-year-old health care task force idea, except that it is paid for by a 15-cent tax on cigarettes. One of the co-authors of the plan, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, credited Mrs. Clinton for her "invaluable help, both in the fashioning and the shaping of the program."

Yea, and I don't know how you can look at what we know about both candidates, weigh that, then come out in support of Trump. But go ahead and vote for someone who's going to limit your right to vote among the other things posted above that you conveniently ignore.

 

[cam>]

Yea, and I don't know how you can look at what we know about both candidates, weigh that, then come out in support of Trump. But go ahead and vote for someone who's going to limit your right to vote among the other things posted above that you conveniently ignore.

It ain't even worth it, bruh. Some people are THAT far gone lol

 

[MewTwo]

LOL!

This is a parody account of a 12 year old, right?

I'm surprised the word "politricks" wasn't used.

Who did you vote for in 2008?

 

[MewTwo]

Also, "The Clinton Foundation" is a money-laundering scheme to make The Clinton's more wealthier. Face it, these Clintons can't be trusted.

Exposed – The Clinton Foundation Is Running A $20 Million Private Equity Firm In Colombia | Zero Hedge
As Colombian Oil Money Flowed To Clintons, State Department Took No Action To Prevent Labor Violations
Clinton Foundation’s Colombian ‘Private Equity Fund’ Was Unregistered

Personally I don't like Trump either. But Hillary is MUCH worse in my view. White liberals CANNOT be trusted.