She ain’t going anywhere… Steph bread too long, way more famous than she is and got hoes that look better than her lined up ready to take her placeAyhsa curry is next on the list
She ain’t going anywhere… Steph bread too long, way more famous than she is and got hoes that look better than her lined up ready to take her placeAyhsa curry is next on the list
They grew apart it happens all the time it's just that you used to be stuck especially if you were s women I'm not mad at it.
I just read this elsewhere. Shyt sad. Feel sorry for that breh.
At the end of the day, she's basically confessing, she fell outta love wit her husband (embarrassing the man publically)....."Thanks for the kids.....but now I wanna thot."
Hopefully, he recognizes he's dodging a missile tho. If the chick, wants to hoe, let the streets have it's way. I'm sure it won't end well for her.
Well, that's what she did. She's giving no reason for her divorce other than she's not happy.
It's basically a kid saying I don't want to bath because I don't.
Again, I asked you the question, if a child who has been unhappy with their parents or parent, now a teenager, can they abandon their parents or parent for happiness?? what would you call that child
Again, I asked you the question if a parent says that they are unhappy with their choice with being a parent, what would you call that parent if they decide to abandon their children or child??
Would you be in here trying to frame them finding happiness as a good thing???or a "take care of yourself thing" You said that the vows need to be changed, so I would ask you this, should the laws on the books be changed if a parent decides to abandon their child/children so that they can find happiness and peace??
Should that parent be placed in a positive light like how you are doing with the Tia chick, because nowhere in this thread you called her out or shamed her for being a home wrecker and abandoning her husband, are those parents just as right/or can be viewed from a positive angle as Tia?
How did you come to that conclusion?She's probably being short on details to protect her ex husband. But if the narrative that she only did this for new dikk starts to take hold, I can imagine her spilling all of beans and getting shyt on for telling the world what went on behind closed doors.
Why?This is a low life mindset.
How did you come to that conclusion?
Because it makes sense. She could easily get into more detail about why she was unhappy in her marriage and why leaving her husband is the path towards happiness.
She's probably being short on details to protect her ex husband. But if the narrative that she only did this for new dikk starts to take hold, I can imagine her spilling all of beans and getting shyt on for telling the world what went on behind closed doors.
If a child abandons their parent because they're unhappy, we'd call that child rebellious because we have all kinds of ready-made labels that don't necessarily capture what the core issues are. In this nation and system children can literally divorce their parents, we call it emancipation and it's an option for kids that are able to support themselves and have irreconcilable issues with their parents.
If a parent is unhappy with their choice being a parent, we have another label for that parent, "deadbeat" because that parent is abandoning their responsibility to raise a child. This is not analogous to one spouse leaving the other.
Tia isn't abandoning her responsibilities as a mother to her children, she is separating from her husband, exiting a 10 year marriage that she cannot find happiness in.
Comparing married people divorcing to a parent abandoning their children is fallacious.
So you're inventing a scenario and smearing the husband so Tia divorcing won't look bad?
Since her leaving her husband for no reason doesn't make sense, you're inventing a reason. Something even her never said.
Stop it and put that cap down.
What do we call folks that give up on obligations, duties "quitters" right? I'm sure you've used all those terms that you have said society cast, but yet you don't have anything negative for a woman, in this case Tia for wrecking her marriage. She's supposed to be able to do what she wants and not have any type of accountability casted on her because she is a woman, ok, let's go with that. I'm fine with it BUT:
If a man decides to just up and leave their marriage of however many days, years because he's unhappy, will you have that same energy and cast him in the same positive light as you are doing Tia. I hope you do, because that's what is about to start happening seeing how women have been doing it for many years, and it's getting out of hand by the day.
Tia case doesn't not make things any better, but that's the road she took, so be it. BUT again
Just remember now, when men start up and divorcing their wives (women mostly are the ones who file for divorce 70-80% filing rate by women) because they are feeling down and out and unhappy, filling for divorce because they are unhappy, let's keep that same energy. And before you go to that so call stance on "Men don't divorce their wives they just cheat" just remember married black men cheat at a 28% rate and black women cheat at a 24% rate, close behind, I would go on to say that women cheat more because of the attention that women get, but again:
When men start divorcing women because they are unhappy and they want happiness and peace and find it with another woman or just want to get back in the game and hoe around, let's all praise that man for his decision to wanting to find peace and happiness.
Let's have the same energy when a man leaves a woman of x number of years who hasn't done anything foul in the marriage, the man is just unhappy, give him the same grace as you are giving Tia.
Nope. You clearly said that you're making up scenario in order for her action to make sense.I'm not inventing a reason at all, I'm making a logical hypothesis based on what we know. Where is your smoke for the other people in here making up scenarios about her destroying her family because she wants some new dikk.