Can you elaborate on the bold a bit more?
It's pretty detailed and convoluted a bit bc I connect a lot of my ideas on human psychology with how I see the sciences have been handled and taught, but I'll try to make it comprehensible lol.
Again, this is just my theory from all of the information I've processed. But it's something they are alluding to in the article without realizing it completely. The observer/physicist believes they can observe something without literally being a part of the "experiment" themselves.
It is a god complex to think the answer is waiting for us to discover because everything exists and has a specific purpose that ISNT all about us. We are 100% just a part of the universe with the same value and importance of the proton being observed, especially when we are getting to a point of pontificating on the DESIGN of our reality.
The best way I can explain it is, the proton exists in reality just as much as we do, exists with purpose with or without our interaction with it. We are not as important as well think we are in terms of how the universe operates. So while we are observing it, it is also observing us the same, bc it exists on it's its own just as much as we do.
The tree in the forest/make a sound argument is the most egocentric human discussion I ever heard. OF COURSE IT DOES. Just as it does on a planet without humans in a another part of the universe, bc it's existence isn't predicated on us measuring it.