These are AI videos...... It's over

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,833
Reputation
7,926
Daps
148,799
the mouth movement and stabilization still looks very off but I am sure they will eventually improve, everything else is great. Going to cause a lot of issues. These probably trick older people already

possible to get it right post video generation...


1/1
After almost indistinguishable photorealistic FLUX images, checkout these lip-sync demos from ReSyncer.

We've truly arrived in the post-truth era.

ReSyncer


To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196

 

SupaDupaFresh

Superstar
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Messages
6,225
Reputation
5,336
Daps
32,204
theres a a couple of threads already.

just a few months ago, a poster on here said no one is gonna watch a movie made by AI. :mjlol:

some people have no vision :francis:

No one is.

Flashy commercials and promotional stuff Sure. I can see AI replacing human beings for commercials, music videos, maybe even video game trailers and stuff like that.

But seeing the artistic vision and expression of other human beings is practically why we watch movies. An AI film would have no standard. Even if the visuals and stories are up to every standard.

The only big "film" industry I can see being thoroughly decimated by photorealistic AI is porn. Porn is already completely superficial in this age of quick internet drops and social media.

I can see people preferring to generate whatever they want to see into a video with this level of realism, rather than relying on recorded shyt and real people. Which would probably be better for humanity.
 
Last edited:

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
19,205
Reputation
4,030
Daps
45,937
Producer created media is over by 2040-45 in the way that we consume it now. I see consumer produced media becoming the wave and media companies licensing out the likenesses, settings, archetypes, just like videogame companies sell skins/maps. We consume it primarily for ourselves, but the more talented of us upload it to streaming services like YouTube and it's monetized that way.

I could go deeper on my thoughts on this. Don't want to derail the thread.

But nah, this is the way to be thinking. How does not just affect consumption patterns but what does this do for the very concept of creativity and the industries around it. Beyond just deepfakes and porn, this could wipe out the entire film/music industry in a matter of years not decades unless there's some stop gaps put in NOW.
 

Vandelay

Waxing Intellectual
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
23,007
Reputation
5,610
Daps
79,769
Reppin
Phi Chi Connection
But nah, this is the way to be thinking. How does not just affect consumption patterns but what does this do for the very concept of creativity and the industries around it. Beyond just deepfakes and porn, this could wipe out the entire film/music industry in a matter of years not decades unless there's some stop gaps put in NOW.

I've been saying 2030 is going to be a wild year for some time, you can search my name and 2030, but now the tech titans are starting to hone in on this date.


These are not shot in the dark prophecies, they're tied to Moore's law, so in a roundabout way, barring some unforeseen stagnation or cataclysm; depression, war, pandemic, etc; this technology will be commercialized and stratified amongst commercial and consumer uses.

This technology will be so good by 2030 businesses will have to make life-altering/industry-defining decisions within a few months or literally their entire business model will collapse. For instance, Warner Bros will get dusted if they still have to pay casts and production crews at 2030 market rates and Disney with a significant portion of their catalog and future catalog is animated and computer generated. Imagine they keep using RDJ's likeness in future MCU productions and just pay his estate $40 million a year with occasional cost of sales increases due to societal inflation. Imagine if they do this across all main casts, and CGI all other likenesses. No need to source new talent because RDJ will "ALWAYS" be Ironman, and new audiences reject Tom Cruise or whoever else is the new young talented actor of the day.

Now Imagine this applied to ALL industries where content is absorbed on a screen. There will be niche feal/live action content created, maybe A24 will still continue to produce with live actors and crew, and people will pay the premium because their content is just that good and it's some futile attempt to resist the impending trend. But people families won't be able to have that level of resistance because they can't afford to pay all content creators this way; it's too expensive and as a result companies have to adapt or die.

And don't get me start on the economic, social, and even psychological issues this will present. It's not going anywhere, but the government desperately needs to legislate so that they can guide the turmoil that this will undoubtedly cause.
 
Last edited:

Tribal Outkast

Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
29,783
Reputation
3,593
Daps
90,975
yawn.

Sure. As long as everyone looks like a Sports Illustrated swimsuit model.

Tell me when it can fake ugly people and multiple people without the wonkiness.
What kills me is how all these people will post these obvious AI pics of themselves looking like straight models when they look nothing like that! Then people be in the comments talking about “gorgeous” :mjlol: If this shyt becomes the norm… I just don’t know man
 
Top