Why did the Vatican remove 14 books from the Bible in 1684?
By the beginning of the fifth century, the Catholic Church had established the Canon of Scripture, and the Bible contained a total of 46 Old Testament books and 27 New Testament books, for a total of 73 books.
In 1546, about 1,000 years later, the Council of Trent reaffirmed the Canon of Scripture, confirming the 73 books of the Bible.
Today, about another 500 years further on, the Canon of Scripture remains exactly the same, and the Bible contains a total of 46 Old Testament books and 27 New Testament books, for a total of 73 books.
However, in the mid-16th century, in the wake of the Protestant Reformation, most Protestant sects, beginning with the Church of England, removed several Old Testament books from the Canon of Scripture.
The Catholic Church never removed 14 books from the Bible, and the Catholic Bible has remained the same for about 1,600 years.
ie.
Jesus Christ was married to Mary Magdalene and had two children (the book of maccabees)
1594
1863
1885
sophia charlotte.
The language of Jesus (Yeshua) at the time was Hebrew And Aramaic. Following Hebrew traditions and lore. All an angels had an “El” of some form in there name (el meaning ___ of God) Ex. Michael, Rafael, Gabriel, Uriel. Lucifer is Latin and a title actually not really a name so that alone is a major discrepancy. Then we have the name satan, which is not a name but also a title and is Greek which means adversary/tempter. I speculated that the angel that betrayed god maybe azazel or azrael but that may not be entirely true to, see below for my reasons why. What’s interesting is that in Arabic/Islamic text Satan was never considered an angel but was rather a jinn, I’m not sure if you understand what jinns are but that statement alone changes a lot of stuff
thats what i am saying bro even pro-black scholars meanings differ and different aspects revealed with different understanding.
i will look up the king of babylon now, but please bro unleash them jewels
It’s interesting how we never find out satans intended name. when he has God test Job and when Jesus was in the desert fasting he both simply referred to as literally the adversary/tempter (satan) or just flat out not named. Iirc azazel is as different angel entirely. In some texts he was regarded as the offspring of satan. In others He was another angel that rebelled right after satan just as you said
what you wrote true gems.
i never gave much stock to the nephillims and that, but i have seen some lectures and artifacts and bones on youtube and magazines like national geographic but i hear you there.
and you're right i already knew most the coli would be up on the omitted verses and translations. i heard also Joseph was not a poor man he was a well sort after guard of the embassy a revered after individual not a humble worker.
fantastic.
to add to the african history book the original noahs ark is as small as a canoe its held in a musuem somewhere on the continent i will see if i can find it.
but yes a lot of these bible stories are african folklore tales and etc but if you do have any more details, you are very well versed.
all dope but i was taught that serapis aka. soter aka. the first white pharoah of eygpt was the image of christ.
i will look into cesar borgia now, but more info on that would be dope. here is serapis below.
