Who Wins the WC?

  • France

    Votes: 60 21.8%
  • Germany

    Votes: 47 17.1%
  • Brazil

    Votes: 71 25.8%
  • Argentina

    Votes: 24 8.7%
  • Spain

    Votes: 12 4.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 52 18.9%
  • Ronaldo & Friends

    Votes: 9 3.3%

  • Total voters
    275
  • Poll closed .

Baka's Weird Case

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2015
Messages
15,821
Reputation
6,871
Daps
77,272
Reppin
Goon Squad - Catset
this doesnt really make sense. it depends on how you root for a country. if you think a countrys national team is tied to its political history, government and society than you shouldnt ignore how you feel just to root for a team that has some black players.

im not saying that you should root for france or croatia in the final bc ill honestly be happy with either team winning (although im rooting a little more for france). and its fine if someone personally wants croatia to win because they hate frances history with black people, or if they want france to win because of its black players.

but you cant force your own views like this onto other people, ignoring how they view international racism and call them c00ns.
 

MikeyC

The Coli Royal Rumble Champion 2019
Joined
Jan 4, 2015
Messages
25,802
Reputation
5,074
Daps
88,624
Reppin
London
I’m ignorant for stating that this England team is average and would get found out against a decent team? It’s not my fault you support a team of losers:mjgrin:

Nope

You're an ignorant casual because you've only popped up in this thread within the past week to talk about teams/players that you dislike, rather than talk about the teams/players that you do.

You move like that dikkhead @Swagnificent
 

DrHackenbush

Happy wars/sad love songs
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
3,135
Reputation
1,160
Daps
7,492
I love Robbie from Arsenal Fan TV, but dude needs to stop saying Jack Wilshire would've made a difference.

:snoop:

He would have. Alli and Lingard have no idea how to play as central midfielders and Henderson is square balls only. At least Jack would have looked to play the ball forward. How do you take Fabian Delph but not Wilshire? Croatia have one of the best midfields at the WC, that's where this game was won and lost
 

SubZeroDegrees

50 shots in the blender.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
34,325
Reputation
3,716
Daps
75,423
Reppin
Nawlins
Keeper's legs were wide open, near post wide open..He literally put it in the only spot the keeper would save it. I'm delighted England lost but only because of the fans, the players seem like a good bunch of lads

You know Kane is swagless, so he wasn't going 5-hole. He going direct most of the times.
 

Anwulika

All Star
Joined
Sep 27, 2015
Messages
1,491
Reputation
330
Daps
3,617
:yeshrug:

I'm not that fussed tbh. Croatia were a better team all tournament.

This is the first England team I've liked and I wanted the young boys to eat. Young Rashford :mjcry:

But the media and the chavs put me off. Tearing up that Ikea after beating Sweden ...smashing up ambulances etc :scusthov:


I was just calling out the hypocrisy of supporting all white teams under the guise of pro-blackness because England players are mixed race and have white S/Os :heh:

Tbf, I didn’t really dislike this team as much as I did the others. Sterling, Pickford and Rashford are some of my favourite players in the league. You guys just needed some extra fluidity in your midfield to give yourselves an added threat- you can’t just rely on set-pieces all the time. This might be an unpopular opinion but I really think that the FA should look into hiring Wenger as manager- he’ll work wonders with your team imo,
 

4-Rin

Superstar
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
5,690
Reputation
1,831
Daps
22,297
I like this England squad. They work hard and play their roles. They just had no number 8. Imagine they had a prime Scholes on this team. :ehh:

Some on here believe this England squad is better than Scholes generation :yeshrug:
I don't think this Croatia team is better than the 2002 Brazil, 2006 Portugal or 2010 Germany squads.
So I still believe the 2002 - 2010 English teams were better than the current one.
 

TTT

All Star
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
2,249
Reputation
460
Daps
5,556
Reppin
NULL
Some on here believe this England squad is better than Scholes generation :yeshrug:
I don't think this Croatia team is better than the 2002 Brazil, 2006 Portugal or 2010 Germany squads.
So I still believe the 2002 - 2010 English teams were better than the current one.
The 2002-2006 English teams were good, the 98 team was also good they played 3 at the back and went toe to toe with a good Argentine team. People mention their midfielders but i always thought England had more talent in defence. Sol Campbell, Rio,Terry,Cole were world class at their positions. They were let down by coaching and 4-4-2 which shoehorned players into roles they didn't play at club level.Southgate may have had some personnel wrong but he moved away from the past set ups. Gerrard and Lampard played with Xabi, Mascherano, Makelele, Essien, Ballack often behind them and yet the NT coaches thought they could play them as a midfield 2. The time they put Hargreaves in they were cohesive.
 
Last edited:
Top