The "To trade...or not to trade" Thread

Anbesa

All Star
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
2,337
Reputation
400
Daps
6,927
Reppin
Atlanta
dire need of a RB

2qb flex/ppr
A guy was tom brady for mckinnon
I feel like the value isnt there, and im really tryna work him for leveon bell. But if it comes to it, should i take austin davis and Mckinnon for brady
 

VBM

┌∩┐(●_●)┌∩┐
Joined
Jul 20, 2012
Messages
11,924
Reputation
2,905
Daps
29,368
Reppin
Dallas by way of Houston by way of San Antonio
dire need of a RB

2qb flex/ppr
A guy was tom brady for mckinnon
I feel like the value isnt there, and im really tryna work him for leveon bell. But if it comes to it, should i take austin davis and Mckinnon for brady

Who are the current QB free agents? Also depends on what your RB options are.

I think McKinnon will be a solid RB2 for the rest of the season. Looks like Zimmer has turned his back on AsiGAWDa for the most part.
 

Anbesa

All Star
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
2,337
Reputation
400
Daps
6,927
Reppin
Atlanta
Who are the current QB free agents? Also depends on what your RB options are.

I think McKinnon will be a solid RB2 for the rest of the season. Looks like Zimmer has turned his back on AsiGAWDa for the most part.
its a 14 team 2qb flex

so to answer the question.....no one
maybe colt mccoy lol
 

VBM

┌∩┐(●_●)┌∩┐
Joined
Jul 20, 2012
Messages
11,924
Reputation
2,905
Daps
29,368
Reppin
Dallas by way of Houston by way of San Antonio
Ben Tate, Steven Jackson, James Stark, and Ryan Matthews

So it's basically which is the better option:

1. Brady/Tate/S-Jax

or

2. Davis/Tate/McKinnon

Looking at my Yahoo league (6 pts per passing TD, 1 pt per 25 yards), Brady's averaging 19.63 ppg. Davis is averaging 17.55 ppg. It's not a bad dropoff.

Jackson is :flabbynsick:
Starks is clearly behind Lacy and (I think) is banged up
Mathews might not get his job back with Oliver playing so well.

It's close, but that deal could pay off with you (esp. with McKinnon's upcoming schedule). -
 

Pedro Negro

Reefer & Sneakers
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,462
Reputation
669
Daps
6,709
Reppin
New York fukkin' City
mcfadden has some horrific matchups coming but he's a lead back and to be able to pick that up on waivers is something not to take lightly.
i badly need a wr for week 9/10 so plugging in denard thanks to his dual status is a nice little novelty, but he does need to produce.
baldwin is good but it's still a lynch, wilson offense. i cant go for any SEA wr.
Jackson is droppable to me

I got McFadden and Tre Mason this week. Like you said, not a huge McFadden fan but getting him off waivers was too good to pass up. I love his matchup against CLE this week too. Starting him in my flex.
Dropped Knile instead of S-Jax though. :lupe:
 

BreezyH

All Star
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
2,540
Reputation
320
Daps
4,010
Reppin
Brooklyn
I got McFadden and Tre Mason this week. Like you said, not a huge McFadden fan but getting him off waivers was too good to pass up. I love his matchup against CLE this week too. Starting him in my flex.
Dropped Knile instead of S-Jax though. :lupe:

knile is a great handcuff, he always produces when given the opportunity as lead back and charles isn't made of steel but if you have other needs, then he has to go. if i have a player that i have to let go but don't want anyone else to have i'll silently drop him on a non-waiver day and hope once he clears there's no comp to get him back
 

Anbesa

All Star
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
2,337
Reputation
400
Daps
6,927
Reppin
Atlanta
dire need of a RB

2qb flex/ppr
A guy was tom brady for mckinnon
I feel like the value isnt there, and im really tryna work him for leveon bell. But if it comes to it, should i take austin davis and Mckinnon for brady
Aight so it's become a little more of a bidding war
I can take Julio and Bridgewater for brady and Keenan allen
OR lamar Miller and Austin Davis for Tom Brady...
 

Pedro Negro

Reefer & Sneakers
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,462
Reputation
669
Daps
6,709
Reppin
New York fukkin' City
knile is a great handcuff, he always produces when given the opportunity as lead back and charles isn't made of steel but if you have other needs, then he has to go. if i have a player that i have to let go but don't want anyone else to have i'll silently drop him on a non-waiver day and hope once he clears there's no comp to get him back

I kind of regret the move a little (picked Mason up for him) but my thinking was that his prime productive days are behind him now that Charles is back to full health. Mason has more upside, IMO.

Here's a doozy:

Would you drop Justin Hunter for Andrew Hawkins?

Now mind you.....

The ONLY reason I'm considering it is because holding onto Hunter requires me to start Jeremy Hill in Week 9 due to all the teams on bye.

Hunter is on a bye in Week 9 too.

If I drop him for Hawkins I'll end up with Hawkins in my starting lineup over Hill for Week 9, which I feel is a better play.

Long term, I like Hunter's value way more (especially now that Locker's coming back) but I strictly have an eye on next week and securing this first round bye.

None of these players would crack my starting lineup any other week.

Thoughts?
 

BreezyH

All Star
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
2,540
Reputation
320
Daps
4,010
Reppin
Brooklyn
I kind of regret the move a little (picked Mason up for him) but my thinking was that his prime productive days are behind him now that Charles is back to full health. Mason has more upside, IMO.

Here's a doozy:

Would you drop Justin Hunter for Andrew Hawkins?

Now mind you.....

The ONLY reason I'm considering it is because holding onto Hunter requires me to start Jeremy Hill in Week 9 due to all the teams on bye.

Hunter is on a bye in Week 9 too.

If I drop him for Hawkins I'll end up with Hawkins in my starting lineup over Hill for Week 9, which I feel is a better play.

Long term, I like Hunter's value way more (especially now that Locker's coming back) but I strictly have an eye on next week and securing this first round bye.

None of these players would crack my starting lineup any other week.

Thoughts?

i like hunter's schedule better the rest of the way and there's no competition in terms of targets on his team. aj is trending up to play even if he isn't fully healthy. can't speak on your bye situation, but it's def a bytch at times
 

BreezyH

All Star
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
2,540
Reputation
320
Daps
4,010
Reppin
Brooklyn
i like hunter's schedule better the rest of the way and there's no competition in terms of targets on his team. aj is trending up to play even if he isn't fully healthy. can't speak on your bye situation, but it's def a bytch at times
Aight so it's become a little more of a bidding war
I can take Julio and Bridgewater for brady and Keenan allen
OR lamar Miller and Austin Davis for Tom Brady...

both are good deals, i like austin's schedule come playoff time. but idk your standing right now. also to get super nerdy: brady's health has been an issue this year. pats usually dont rest guys, but if they wrap up the division fairly easy (it is the AFC east haha) then there is at least a possibility that he dials it back. i don't think u make a trade decision based on this but that's how my mind works sometimes. i haven't seen enough of teddy to know if he can make some things happen, but his weapons are limited. nfc defenses aside from the lions and pretty flabby and MIN will be playing from behing most weeks...
 
Top