The Series We've Been Waiting For: Official Warriors vs. Spurs WCF Thread

Who you got?


  • Total voters
    273
  • Poll closed .

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,795
Reputation
975
Daps
106,199
How hilarious that @GoddamnyacacProf would dap this. Harden had TWO opportunitites to beat this "injured" Spurs squad, and he still couldn't capatilize (I mean really, how pathetic is that?). Clearly the Spurs are the better team healthy or not, so I don't see the sense in laughing at the Warriors playing a team that's not completely healthy, when the "injured" Spurs are still more of a challenge than the Rockets.
Its about the Warriors always lucking up into playing injured teams, has nothing to do with the Rockets. Stop dap-watching, its really pathetic. :heh:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
85,021
Reputation
9,353
Daps
229,890
Its about the Warriors always lucking up into playing injured teams, has nothing to do with the Rockets. Stop dap-watching, its really pathetic. :heh:
It has absolutely everything to do with the Rockets (specifically Harden). You knock the success/ability of this Warriors squad because they play "injured" teams, yet the player who you are an apologist for can't beat one of those "injured" teams when given multiple opportunities. That's what's really pathetic. You're basically shytting on Harden more anything else. Every time you bring up the Warriors' fortunes of playing/beating "injured" teams, is just a reminder that not only wasn't Harden good enough to take advantage of the same opportunity, but he completely shat the bed. Twice over.

:picard:
 
Last edited:

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,795
Reputation
975
Daps
106,199
It has absolutely everything to do with the Rockets (specifically Harden). You knock the success/ability of this Warriors squad because they play "injured" teams, yet the player who you are an apologist for can't beat one of those "injured" teams when given multiple opportunities. That's what's really pathetic. You're basically shytting on Harden more anything else.

:picard:
I've been shytting on Harden since game 5, he looked like he had money on San An, remember? Claiming Ive been apologizing for him is more of your usual alt. facts.

None of that has any bearing on the fact that the Warriors have almost exclusively faced teams with key injuries for 3 seasons running now. Lol at you putting injured in quotations like it isnt true :jagfan: smh
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
85,021
Reputation
9,353
Daps
229,890
I've been shytting on Harden since game 5, he looked like he had money on San An, remember? Claiming Ive been apologizing for him is more of your usual alt. facts.

None of that has any bearing on the fact that the Warriors have almost exclusively faced teams with key injuries for 3 seasons running now. Lol at you putting injured in quotations like it isnt true :jagfan: smh
:heh:

This is hilarious on so many levels. You're basically admitting to the fact that you were completely out of your depth when evaluting Harden, and have been for the past half a decade. While also admitting that you were wrong for shytting on the Warriors at any point you were praising Harden in the same frame. And yet here you are still trying to get shots in on GS. Your game is painfully transparent. No wonder you started stanning Harden in the first place.
 

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,795
Reputation
975
Daps
106,199
:heh:

This is hilarious on so many levels. You're basically admitting to the fact that you were completely out of your depth when evaluting Harden, and have been for the past half a decade. While also admitting that you were wrong for shytting on the Warriors at any point you were praising Harden in the same frame. And yet here you are still trying to get shots in on GS. Your game is painfully transparent. No wonder you started stanning Harden in the first place.
None of that follows logically. You're reaching for connections that arent there to satisfy your pathology.
 
Top