The Russia - Ukraine Conflict

Orbital-Fetus

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
41,002
Reputation
18,289
Daps
149,792
Reppin
Humanity
The Realist Perspective said:
People like you make me laugh. You’re so hungry for action, go fight your fukking self. No you’re talking about OTHER people fighting, not you of course.
Click to expand...

When have I ever advocated for war?

*Edit*

I'm a veteran of three Rep Wars so show some respect.
 
Max B

Max B

Superstar
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
12,706
Reputation
495
Daps
16,976
Reppin
tdot
Adeptus Astartes said:
:russ::mjlol:This dude posting whole ass alt-right accounts now.

What did Zelensky lie about?

Maybe your Russian pals could have, you know, NOT targeted a nuclear facility...
Click to expand...
The nuclear facility is stable right now and no radiation has happen. You must be one of those morons who probably believed it would be worst than what happen in Chernobyl.

either way it’s ticking time clock for Ukraine. The sooner they submit the better for their situation. Fighting a losing battle isn’t the right move for them
 
Adeptus Astartes

Adeptus Astartes

Loyal servant of the God-Brehmperor
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Messages
11,504
Reputation
2,846
Daps
70,598
Reppin
Imperium of Man
Max B said:
The nuclear facility is stable right now and no radiation has happen. You must be one of those morons who probably believed it would be worst than what happen in Chernobyl.

either way it’s ticking time clock for Ukraine. The sooner they submit the better for their situation. Fighting a losing battle isn’t the right move for them
Click to expand...
I never said it would be worse than Chernobyl. Y'all Pro Russians are out here more upset about a panicked reaction to the shelling of a nuclear facility than the actual shelling of a nuclear facility :mjlol:
 
☑

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Hall of Shame
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
314,327
Reputation
-34,223
Daps
624,124
Reppin
The Deep State
Max B said:
The nuclear facility is stable right now and no radiation has happen. You must be one of those morons who probably believed it would be worst than what happen in Chernobyl.

either way it’s ticking time clock for Ukraine. The sooner they submit the better for their situation. Fighting a losing battle isn’t the right move for them
Click to expand...
Your strong argument is that it NOT blowing up proves you right? :gucci:
 
loyola llothta

loyola llothta

☭☭☭
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
35,064
Reputation
7,030
Daps
80,045
Reppin
BaBylon
Rumours Regarding Plan to Remove Russia’s Permanent Seat at the UNSC. Future of the UN?



Amid the abusive wave of sanctions against Russia due to the special operation in Ukraine, some specific rumors have caught the attention of experts, suggesting that there are plans on the part of the Western states to simply pressure to remove Russia’s permanent seat on the UN Security Council (UNSC). This kind of illegal maneuver is a real coup attempt and could lead to the end of the UN.

Apparently, an effort is under way to diplomatically isolate Moscow and even challenge Russia’s right to a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, alleging that Russia took the seat of the former Soviet Union in 1991 without proper authorization – which in fact is nothing more than a public “justification” to promote such an illegal maneuver.

Currently, there are reports circulating on several websites alleging that Western diplomats, mainly American and British, are starting a research work to investigate whether there is a legal possibility of removing Russia from its position on the UNSC within the current international documents. Obviously, this type of “research” is useless and there is no possibility of carrying out this such a maneuver within the limits of public international law. In practice, when reporting that diplomats are investigating this kind of maneuver, it is only possible to conclude that they are somehow conspiring to carry out a coup against Moscow at the United Nations.

This absolutely absurd idea has become a common discourse in the Western media recently. This is due to the fact that the West has become furious with the Russian veto on the American resolution against the operation in Ukraine, voted on at the UNSC last week. Western political analysts began to say that “administrative reform” was needed at the UN to prevent “aggressor nations” from vetoing sanctions against themselves. Shortly thereafter, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelesnky, during one of his online speeches, claimed that Kiev “demands” Russian removal from the Council, strengthening Western discourse.

Quite unexpectedly, diplomats seem to have paid attention to this utterly unrealistic idea suggested by Zelensky and some ideologically fanatical analysts, initiating the current plan, in which Western officials plan to form a legal argument about the “illegitimacy” of the Russian presence on the Council. It is expected that some document will soon emerge containing various distortions and arbitrary interpretations of the norms of international law, just in order to justify the idea of removing Russia.

It is questionable whether the analysts and diplomats involved in this type of maneuver are taking into account all the consequences of this attitude. This irresponsible, illegal, rude and anti-diplomatic act could simply generate the biggest crisis in international relations since the Second World War, directly threatening the stability of global peace.

The very existence of the UN will lose its meaning without the Russian presence in its Security Council, considering the country’s military and nuclear importance. If that happens, the Russian attitude may simply be to abandon the UN, as it will have become a mere pro-Western international organization. China would certainly take the Russian side in this dispute as it would also have its interests affected by the coup in the Security Council. Russia and China would perhaps form a new organization together. And that would be the end of the UN as the regulator of world peace. The UN would have the same end of its predecessor league and this is something that everyone wants to avoid – except the Western officials who are planning the coup against Russia.

Obviously, administrative reform is needed at the UN and until a few days ago there was a consensus on the need to expand the Security Council’s permanent seats, including new emerging states of geopolitical relevance, such as India, Pakistan, Brazil, among others. Trying to reduce the Council is absurd considering that the world is increasingly multipolar. This would be a mere attempt on the part of NATO to carry out a global coup d’état, but instead of controlling the world, it would only bring about the end of the UN.

It is necessary that good sense prevails in the UN, in order to such an illogical project to be promptly rejected, so that the organization survives. The attempt to “cancel” Russia cannot go beyond the limits of international law. It is essential that the main world powers are on the Security Council and that the most important of them have veto power to prevent the interests of one side from prevailing over those of the other. It is this structure that guarantees world peace. It is necessary to increase the permanent seats, giving this right to new world powers, adapting the UN’s structure to the multipolar world. Any attempt to the contrary threatens the very existence of the organization.
Click to expand...

link:

Western anti-Russian agenda threatens UN’s existence
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top