Broke Wave
The GOAT
Mitt Romney gets the nod for doing a program... Over Obama who was the editor of the most prestigious law review in the world.
Most programs basically follow the same formula and shave a year or so by cross registering classes for conveinence. It's the same for every joint program. It's a ridiculous argument either way. They both have stellar academic credentials, but Mittens gets the nod here.
Mitt Romney gets the nod for doing a program... Over Obama who was the editor of the most prestigious law review in the world.
I'm not convinced that completing the MBA/JD is enough to decide that, though. One would have to factor in grades, specific classes taken, extracurricular achievements (I don't think being editor and then president of the law review is exactly insignificant.) If Mitt's degree was just a glorified business degree, which it easily could have been, then I definitely wouldn't consider his education superior with respect to the presidency. He would have literally no educational background in politics and governance.
We could go on and on on.and speculate til the end of time...with college professor reccomendations etc etc...we could call Mittens MBA a "glorified business degree" as much as we could assume Obama made Harvard review because he was "black" or tokenized for it. (I don't think either are true)
But for what we know...Harvard JD/MBA>>>Harvard JD/HLR for President
Bain/ Boston Group Consulting>>> (junior) Civil Rights Attorney
Columbia UG Poli Sci>>> BA English BYU
Translation "I've looked like a fool long enough, so I'll get out of dodge before the sun comes up"
Breh, you didn't prove anything. THe only reason I'm going to stop replying to you after this is to not derail this thread because I'm sure people will be talking about the actual shyt tomorrow morning. If you know anything about me, I can argue all day and that I of all people who post here would know how those degrees work.
Let's go over the facts of your stupidty.
1) You based Romney being more qualified by saying he has a JD/MBA vs. Obama having just a JD. At no point did you implicate which degrees they had. I responded that you can't speak in general terms like that and that JD/MBA are skewed towards business. Your dumbass somehow disagrees. Yet, you've never stepped foot anywhere near an ivy league campus just based on your lack of common sense.
- The Richmond JD/MBA v. Columbia law degree analogy was common sense which you know damn well has nothing to do with where either one of them went to school. It was just a shot at your absolutist rhetoric.
- Further, no a JD/MBA does not always trump a JD. This is why you have no idea what you're talking about. Many employers see no added value on a JD/MBA, many law firms see no difference in it unless you have a specific practice area in corporate law, capital markets, finance, hedge funds, etc. that you want to get into. But you don't go to a top law school so you didn't know that? Did you?
- You've never been prepped for those interivews, have you? Investment banks come onto our campus looking specifically to hire JDs because they like the way they think as opposed to MBAs, but you wouldn't know that, would you?
- Finally, an elite law program education is damn near universally more rigorous than an elite business program education (save like 3 or 4 schools) so the idea that Romney's b-school education gave him anything more than another perspective is ridiculous. Particularly because he got it after going straight through and most businesses have no use for people who get MBA with no prior experience. There's a reason b-school guys laugh at the work law school guys are putting in.
2) You think that highlighting that one has to meet the requirements of both degrees show that they are separate. This again shows your ignorance. Of course you are earning to separate degrees, but within the confines of a structured program. Do you not understand that 1 ENTIRE year of study is being knocked off? Do you think that would be possible otherwise? I would explain it to you but this seems simpler
- fukk if I will, those 10 credits are equal to somewhere between 3-4 classes. That's essentially 3/4 of one semester where the credits count towards both.
- But more on average one would probably have 12-14 credits a semester in law school (depending on how a school counts credits) and end up with about 64 at graduation. Given this program, after the 12 credits in your first year, only 52 TOTAL credits are remaining. Only 36 of which have to be law school classes. Therefore, literally 28% of your would-be law school credits are met by b-school courses.
3) Having to still fulfill the pro bono requirement is not proof that the programs are disconnected. I have no idea what you're trying to prove. But you're not proving it. For your 3rd and 4th years you are simultaneously a student in both schools, on both list serves, etc. You get preferences in classes that give first priority to JD students that b-school kids want and vice versa.
This is what a JD/MBA program looks like at a top law school: http://law.duke.edu/admis/downloads/JDMBAschedules.pdf
But it's no skewed towards business Stop.
I don't even understand what you are arguing. I literally don't understand why you would disagree with me, only to later agree and then think that you made a point.
This is useless... its just your opinion of what makes a better president. He wasn't just part of the HLR he was the editor of the HLR... it's about policy not about who got to do the more prestigious things... Romney's economic and foreign policies make him UTTERLY unqualified to be president, and the American people agree.
So whats the real deal with that Boeing story?
We get it...your the "hip" republican...stop trying to look cool in front of all the libs...your like a republican c00n(not sure I'm allowed to say that)
Stop tap dancing for massa
thereheis is a dumbass. At this point in their career, who gives a shyt what their specific degrees were? Won must still be in college or something.
Another illiterate dem. I guess No Child Left Behind doesn't work after all. If you had been following the bouncing ball, I never made his education a forefront issue. I briefly outlined several key points of his qualifications and the rabid Obama supporters rushed and went on and on about Harvard Law to the point where they were pattently wrong and embarrassed themselves.