The removal of "under god" from the pledge is being debated in Massachusetts supreme court!

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I'm glad that this was done and someone took the initiative to get that taken care of.

I could give two fukks about religion and am the furthest thing from a Churchy Joe, but I just don't see how people can get so bent out of shape over something like this. I'd rather be out enjoying life, but if this is what that family calls enjoyment, they can have it.

Like many aspects of the law, detail matters.

Just because YOU wouldn't spend your time on the issue doesn't mean its less important.

Again. In a nation of laws, whats on the books count.

 

[Trip]

It amazes me ppl give a shyt about this type of stuff.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

which god? the christian god or one of the hundreds of others that have "existed"

I'd love to see their faces when you replace "god" with "allah"

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

It amazes me ppl give a shyt about this type of stuff.

So why put "god" there in the first place?

 

[Trip]

So why put "god" there in the first place?

Its from fukking 400 years ago.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Its from fukking 400 years ago.

No.

Its not.

It was added in 1954 in response to the communist threat. It was added the money in 1956 also in response to the communist threat.

Try again.

 

[OG_StankBrefs]

And throw dat swearin on da bible in court bullshyt in da bushes too.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Its from fukking 400 years ago.

No it isn't. It was put in in 1954 as a political statement against the godless commies during the Cold War. @Mr. Somebody too because I know you're an uneducated moron and didn't know this either.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

And throw dat swearin on da bible in court bullshyt in da bushes too.

I ALWAYS try to affirm.

You ain't gonna get me up there reinforcing that bullshyt symbolism.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

No it isn't. It was put in in 1954 as a political statement against the godless commies during the Cold War. @Mr. Somebody too because I know you're an uneducated moron and didn't know this either.

Whats amazing is that I BLATANTLY put that shyt in the first post and said it several times already and he STILL believes it.

These christians know no ends to their stupidity and arrogance sometimes.

 

[The Bilingual Gringo]

Like many aspects of the law, detail matters.

Just because YOU wouldn't spend your time on the issue doesn't mean its less important.

Again. In a nation of laws, whats on the books count.

That makes sense. I'll sit and see how this rolls out.

 

[Trip]

No it isn't. It was put in in 1954 as a political statement against the godless commies during the Cold War. @Mr. Somebody too because I know you're an uneducated moron and didn't know this either.

Congrats, Jeopardy awaits you.

And im going to continue to not give a shyt.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Congrats, Jeopardy awaits you.

And im going to continue to not give a shyt.

You don't have to give a shyt. Nor do you have to get snarky because you got called out for making an uninformed statement.

 

[Mr. Somebody]

No it isn't. It was put in in 1954 as a political statement against the godless commies during the Cold War. @Mr. Somebody too because I know you're an uneducated moron and didn't know this either.

The remixed version was better. Obviously a man who defends trannies, gays and says disgusting vile filth on a daily basis is going to see this as a win for humanity. I guess thats where you are in life. Lost like things you cant find, friend.

 

[Mr. Somebody]

The same nation we pledged to before 1954.

O, when they were spraying individuals of African descent with hoses. A better time when black women were having their breast chomped off by demonic attack dogs at the hands of satanic leadership. Those times. I guess now individuals with demonic intent are ready to recharge that culture of filth.

Its so demonic, friends. :