The poorer the area the uglier the women

[beenz]

Agree?

doesn't agree. there's always diamonds in the rough.

 

[fscballin]

Fort Worth, Texas hoes

please don't listen to this n*gga


plenty of bread at the Parks Mall right next to Fort Worth


DFW got some of the baddest broads in the country

 

[Lewis Black]

Nah not true. How about them fine ass black women in the worst parts of atl? what bout them fine ass mexicans in the bronx what live in the rat infested projects eating spoiled goya beans? how you explain that fam?

 

[Yinny]

In terms of how they attire/maintain themselves, yeah.

As far as 'natural' beauty/what they're born with, no.

 

[Koapa]

please don't listen to this n*gga


plenty of bread at the Parks Mall right next to Fort Worth


DFW got some of the baddest broads in the country

Dude, I said specifically Fort Worth. I repeat FW hoes are garbage. FW is not a city for young black dudes. Arlington and Dallas got some nice hoez. Hell, on a Friday or Sat. night over in Arlington Highland area, it look ATL.

 

[newworldafro]

Ya obviously don't know about Brazil and Colombia.

I read this thread title thinking the exact same thing....throw in Ethiopia, Angola, Ghana, Philliphines, Egypt, Dominican Republic ............

If what the OP means is that hair, clothing, makeup, weight b/se of better nutrition/diet and an overall appearance of cleanliness may be more present in a wealthier area, which are attractive assets that men tend to seek ......then sure.....

but if your implying that b/se women live in wealthier areas they are automatically better looking than women in poor areas, then your wrong..........if those wealthy women were stripped of their material goods to the point they were in the lower socio-economic realm you probably wouldn't be able to tell she was a formerly wealthy person....

The point is attractiveness is based on the individual's perceptions, genes, and in a contemporary Westernized mindset all the material goods and accoutrements that "help/highlight" feminine features that costs money or even being able to eat healthy and workout.......

 

[ROBEEZYKILLA]

please don't listen to this n*gga


plenty of bread at the Parks Mall right next to Fort Worth


DFW got some of the baddest broads in the country

amen especially in the summer

 

[Commander in Chiefin]

I see you've been to Philly

 

[blackzeus]

In developed countries, yes, because in poor areas, they only have access to sh*tty food. But in poor countries, even though they're poor, they're not eating from the dollar menu at McDonalds, they're eating rice, chicken, and vegetables. Mad dimes livin' in poor areas in Latin America and Asia. But in regards to the US, you are 100% correct. You cannot compare the chicks in Brownsville to the chicks in Manhattan, or the chicks in Port Arthur to the chicks in Dallas, or the chicks in Opa Locka to the chicks in South Beach.

 

[Sierra Mist]

In developed countries, yes, because in poor areas, they only have access to sh*tty food. But in poor countries, even though they're poor, they're not eating from the dollar menu at McDonalds, they're eating rice, chicken, and vegetables. Mad dimes livin' in poor areas in Latin America and Asia. But in regards to the US, you are 100% correct. You cannot compare the chicks in Brownsville to the chicks in Manhattan, or the chicks in Port Arthur to the chicks in Dallas, or the chicks in Opa Locka to the chicks in South Beach.

someone who gets it. Poor people in other countries ain't weighing 200+ pounds. lol

 

[Data-Hawk]

Nah, breh.

The first statement is it.

I live in Bmore.....right by the harbor........

most of them bishes are

But, I understand this. I've coped with knowing that Baltimore just isn't wealthy enough to sustain bad bytches all year around.

That's why I date D.C. bishes.

This man speaks the truth. Only date women frm the county going towards DC.

 

[Grand Cru Boo]

Nah, I don't agree. I seen some good looking woman that live in Brownsville BK (One of the poorest neighborhoods in NYC). I even seen a 10/10 that lived in Brownsville.[/quote

Sorry my g this is false to a certain extent. Morningside/South bronx/ Palanski/ Morrisania is one of the poorest areas in the nation and at the end of the day you can always spot a dime in the jungle, It's subjective. Rosario dawson is a good example of what a poor area can produce.

More resources dont always= better hoes.

 

[rocksteady]

wealthier areas have the same ugly to pretty ratio as anywhere else... it's just that they do a better job of masking it:

 

[TheBigBopper]

I read this thread title thinking the exact same thing....through in Ethiopia, Angola, Ghana, Philliphines, Egypt, Dominican Republic ............

If what the OP means is that hair, clothing, makeup, weight b/se of better nutrition/diet and an overall appearance of cleanliness may be more present in a wealthier area, which are attractive assets that men tend to seek ......then sure.....

but if your implying that b/se women live in wealthier areas they are automatically better looking than women in poor areas, then your wrong..........if those wealthy women were stripped of their material goods to the point they were in the lower socio-economic realm you probably wouldn't be able to tell she was a formerly wealthy person....

The point is attractiveness is based on the individual's perceptions, genes, and in a contemporary Westernized mindset all the material goods and accoutrements that "help/highlight" feminine features that costs money or even being able to eat healthy and workout.......

Dimes in developing countries likely come from the upper echelons on their society. They aren't representative of women there.

 

[JasonSJackson]

naw, its like digging for diamonds........


u just gotta know what an unrefined diamond looks like........and know what to do with it when u get it