The People Vs. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story

Luxury Tax

Middleman Money
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
2,532
Reputation
880
Daps
8,440
Reppin
Bay Area
Read 'If i Did It', as a good addendum to the show....it's available online and it's hilarious....:laff: at his friend 'Charlie' and the description of Goldman, 'You want to try this karate shyt on me'? So much of OJ's narcissim, and control issues, and just insane shyt, dude is a total scumbag. No ones hero.

I don't want to go back and forth about guilt or innocence, because I think those who believe him Guilty aren't rational on the subject, and are too far gone, conspiracies are Justifiable on this one...You have to be realistic. Dozens of police officers and detectives, and other LE personnel risking exposure in a capital murder case? but I believe this is the most accurate description of the murders, and 'shockingly' enough is very similar to the best opinions and analysis I've read....Also, I checked out in depth the whole Jason Simpson theory, because some of the circumstantial evidence deserves at least a glance, and theres nothing real there, the cast is based on a crackpot PI, a redneck from Texas.

Fixed it for you. You sound like someone who isn't interested in the facts of the trial. It's funny how folks back track and want to involve Jason but not look in the direction of a known racist cop who trespassed on OJ property. So let me get this straight, Jason went to OJ's house and left 1 glove outside the property and 1 bloody sock in OJ's room? So all of that so-called evidence that OJ left behind actually belongs to Jason?:wtf:

As stated, I can go back and forth with FACTS & EVIDENCE... The media hyped up the so-called blood evidence but never went into depth or examined the facts pertaining to said evidence.
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
20,362
Reputation
6,156
Daps
63,944
Reppin
San Diego
Obviously that could be useful, depending on factors like what you learned from him, or your interest in his work, his actual role, a street cop would be out of his depth on a homicide....Either way, I don't think it's helped you here......but, it's not personal, I just find it frustrating that people are so quick to take solace in inane theories and bullshyt, when the truth is readily apparent.
 

King Poetic

Lock, Stock & 2 Glocks
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
96,883
Reputation
18,804
Daps
471,898
Reppin
Los Angeles County, California
2ddfead6867a6b75ac7937807024b995.jpg
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
20,362
Reputation
6,156
Daps
63,944
Reppin
San Diego
Fixed it for you. You sound like someone who isn't interested in the facts of the trial. It's funny how folks back track and want to involve Jason but not look in the direction of a known racist cop who trespassed on OJ property. So let me get this straight, Jason went to OJ's house and left 1 glove outside the property and 1 bloody sock in OJ's room? So all of that so-called evidence that OJ left behind actually belongs to Jason?:wtf:

As stated, I can go back and forth with FACTS & EVIDENCE... The media hyped up the so-called blood evidence but never went into depth or examined the facts pertaining to said evidence.

I, in no way, think Jason was responsible. Are you accusing Furhman of the murders in your scenario? I don't at all believe in the scenario you described.
 
Top