DeMarco was a B 135lber, Beltran has 7 losses breh....no way can he be a B 135lber.
Look at their resumes and their losses at 135. DeMarco lost to Valero (A fighter at 135) and Broner (another A fighter at 135lber). He beat Linares and John Molina though and was the WBC Champion.....and you are on record saying,to you a Champion cant be a C fighter
Beltran, however, had notable losses to to Sharif Bogere/Luis Ramon Jr/Terence Crawford. Ramon and Bogere are nowhere on the same level as a Valero or Broner, Crawford IS up there though. Beltran's best victory is a MD against Hank Lundy and Beltran's never been a Champion. He also has 4 other losses, 2 via KO on his resume at 135 to other non-noteworthy fighters
No way possible, imo of course, is Beltran =/> than Antonio Demarco at 135.
Crawford's best victory to me was his destruction of Gamboa because it showed his in ring adjustment skill and he showed off different skills we didnt know he possessed. Even though Gamboa was undersized, it was STILL a great victory and MUCH better than Broner's victory over Gavin Rees
Broner vs Crawford would be a great matchup though, because regardless of that, Crawford dominated everyone placed in front of him this year and he doesnt have to beat Richard Abril for me to know he's the best at 135