tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,788
Hillary Clinton State Department Approved Weapons Sales In 2012 For Company That Made Sandy Hook Assault Rifle
By Clark Mindock @clarkmindock AND David Sirota @davidsirota On 04/18/16 AT 5:04 PM


rtx2airy.jpg

Hillary Clinton speaks to the press alongside Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., after a campaign visit to the Kung Fu Tea restaurant in Queens, New York, Monday, April 18, 2016. Schumer is supporting her campaign for president. Photo: Reuters
Hillary Clinton presents herself as a tough advocate for gun control. But the State Department she led for four years helped approve more than $100 million in weapons sales for a handful of companies — including the manufacturer of the AR-15 semi-automatic that Adam Lanza used to kill 20 children in Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012.

The sales to foreign nations, noted in Defense Department documents, include $4.2 million in receipts from the Remington Arms Co., which was sued by families of the Sandy Hook victims. They argued that the company was culpable because it marketed military-grade weapons to civilians.

During the 2016 campaign, Clinton has accepted contributions from financial firms that own sizable stakes in the gun industry while criticizing rival Sen. Bernie Sanders as soft on gun safety. She has cited his opposition to laws that could hold gun manufacturers liable for mass shootings, explicitly invoking the Sandy Hook massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, to make her case.

“This is the only industry in America, the only one, that has this kind of special protection,” Clinton said during last week’s Democratic debate in Brooklyn. “He voted for the most important NRA priority, namely, giving immunity from liability to gun makers and dealers — something that is at the root of a lot of problems we are facing.”

In debates or her stump speech, Clinton has not mentioned the arms deal that benefited Remington. (She also has not mentioned that while she led the State Department, various countries whose governments made donations to the Clinton Foundation received a boost in arms export approvals.) Clinton isn't the only Democrat who supported such deals. In 2011, Sen. Charles Schumer of New York — also a vocal gun-control advocate — praised the decision to award the company a U.S. military contract.

"Remington is a proud New York company with a world-class workforce that makes some of the finest firearms produced anywhere in the country,” he said.

Two years later, Remington announced it had received a contract to provide arms to special operations forces.
 

tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,788
Clinton's national support falls below 50% for the first time
PA-26052048.jpg

Bernie Sanders has narrowed Hillary Clinton's national lead among Democratic primary voters to 8 points
Follow @YouGovUS on twitter and stay up to date with the latest news and results

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has won eight of the last nine contests for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination, but he continues to trail former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in pledged delegates, the total vote count and the preference of Democratic primary voters in the latest Economist/YouGov Poll. However, he has reduced Clinton’s margin to single digits, and this week’s poll marks one of the best showings ever for Sanders in the Economist/YouGov polls.

demupdate3.png

Sanders leads with white Democratic primary voters, liberals, and those under the age of 45. Clinton leads Sanders by 21 points among those Democratic voters in the age group that both candidates are in, the 65 and older group. There is a sizable gender gap in this poll: Sanders has a six-point lead among male Democratic voters, while Clinton holds a surprisingly large 17-point lead with women Democratic voters.

demtabapr11.png

Both candidates’ supporters are equally likely to describe their support as “strong,” but there are differences in how each group would react if their preferred candidate did not become the party standard bearer. Just 15% of Clinton supporters say they would be “upset” if Sanders won the nomination, while more than twice as many Sanders supporters (33%) say they would be “upset” if Clinton were the party’s nominee.

From Sanders to Trump
That more intense commitment among Sanders supporters also extends to their current expression of a fall vote intention. More Sanders supporters than Clinton supporters claim they will not vote Democratic if their candidate is not the nominee (historically, opinions expressed during an intense primary battle frequently underrepresent vote for the eventual fall nominee, so those results should not be read as predictions). However, Sanders supporters today offer more support to Clinton than Republican Donald Trump’s current voters offer to a Republican Party nominee not named Trump. Only about half of Trump’s current supporters say they would vote Republican in that circumstance.

parloyalapr11.png

Sanders supporters are looking ahead to a political revolution. 59% of Americans overall believe that the country “needs a political revolution,” and that belief is most apparent among the supporters of the two insurgent candidates – Sanders on the Democratic side and Donald Trump among Republicans. But that opinion is not just limited to those two candidates’ voters. Even 40% of those Democratic voters who want Clinton to be the nominee agree the country needs a political revolution.

polrevapr11.png

A majority of Sanders supporters see the country as on the wrong track, another contrast with Clinton supporters. Sanders supporters, however, are nowhere near as negative about the state of the country as those Republican voters who favor Donald Trump.

wrongtrack1pr11.png

Who's qualified to be president?
Clinton is still viewed as the likely nominee: nearly all of her supporters and 40% of Sanders’ think she will win the nomination. And on many “presidential” characteristics, she remains far ahead of Sanders and the three remaining Republican candidates. She is the only remaining candidate seen by a majority of the public as understanding the problems a president must deal with. Two-thirds say she does, including 51% of Republicans (not much lower than the percentage of Republican voters saying this about the three Republicans). A majority of Americans think she is ready to serve as Commander-in-Chief (Sanders scores second highest on this trait, though only 38% think he is ready to be Commander-in-Chief).

Clinton is also the only remaining candidate a majority views as being qualified to serve as President Sanders is second on this as well.

qualifyapr112.png

But Sanders continues to have strengths: 54% of the public overall (and even a plurality of Republican primary voters) say he is honest and trustworthy. Less than a third of Americans think this about Clinton. The difference between Clinton supporters and Sanders supporters on this question is particularly striking. 62% of Clinton supporters say Sanders is honest and trustworthy; only 20% of Sanders supporters say that about Clinton.

Additionally, Clinton and Sanders score well on being strong leaders (57% and 52% "strong", respectively), but so does Donald Trump (57%). All three of those candidates are seen as strong leaders by more Americans than rate President Obama that way (47%).

See the Economist/YouGov results

Economist/YouGov poll archives can be found here.
 

Xyrax

Superstar
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
4,566
Reputation
2,137
Daps
26,120
You don't think the crowd reaction will influence who voters at home think won?

Nope. Older voters especially don't care about the cheers and what everyone else thinks. They are going to judge it based on what was said and their own feelings on it. I think this Tuesday and next Tuesday are going to be really enlightening for a lot of people. For them to get a better idea of just how miniscule online memes, reddit, cheering crowds at debates and the like actually reflect the entirety of the electorate. I don't dislike Bernie, but I can very easily see that he is losing, and losing big time.

His honesty on Israel in particular is going to massacre him in NY. Its not that what he is saying wasn't true, its the timing of when he said it. Suicide before a city like New York. I admire him being honest, but being 100% honest about everything only guarantees results in a utopia, and we ain't that.
 
Top