man . we are gucci !!!! Most of yall cant see this.
http://www.csnbayarea.com/raiders/woodson-contract-talks-raiders-hit-snagWoodson Contract Talks With Raiders Hit A Snag
Oh really?
Teams also put crazy incentives in contracts or make dudes have insane cap numbers for a year as well.
So we got teams like Panthers/Eagles outchea locking up their top players while our #1 priority is resigning bums like Barnes and a special teams player
Raiders got $67 million in cap space. You all need to spend a minimum of 89% of the cap of $133 million which is like $119 million.
Section 9. Minimum Team Cash Spending:
(a) For each of the following four-League Year periods, 2013–2016 and 2017–2020, there shall be a guaranteed Minimum Team Cash Spending of 89% of the Salary Caps for such periods (e.g., if the Salary Caps for the 2013–16 and 2017–2020 are $100, 120, 130, and 150 million, respectively, each Club shall have a Minimum Team Cash Spending for that period of $445 million (89% of $500 million))
(b) Any shortfall in the Minimum Team Cash Spending at the end of a League Year in which it is applicable (i.e., the 2016 and 2020 League Years) shall be paid, on or before the next September 15, by the Team having such shortfall, directly to the players who were on such a Team’s roster at any time during the applicable seasons, pursuant to the reasonable allocation instructions of the NFLPA.
Note that this is cash spending, i.e., the money actually paid out, independent of the actual salary cap hit. In other words, if the total salary cap from 2013 to 2016 is $500 million, the total cash paid to players by each team from the beginning of the 2013 league year to the end of the 2016 league year must be at least 89% x $500 million = $445 million.
If teams fail to do this, then the difference gets paid out to the players on the team during that time span.
Bra, I asked for the break down on this issue on a Pats board. This is what I got.
(This was all apart of one post)
The CBA on the Issue..
The break down from the poster for me. And I asked for the dummies version...
So ya,I have no fukking idea..
http://www.dawgsbynature.com/2014/2...salary-cap-understanding-the-89-cash-spending
That should help you . Read slow bro.
Props breh. What a god damn mess man..
As far as i understand , It is a good thing for the Raiders.
He looking for that final payday though. dude is 37 years oldWoodson on ESPN Milwaukee yesterday
http://cdn.stationcaster.com/stations/wauk/media/mp3/02_27_14_Charles_Woodson-1393517543.mp3
Damn, sounds like he really might retire if Oakland decides to go in a different direction
Wish we restructured when his agent went to the team in 2012
King Chuck about to retire?
Hope he plays. He can still play