King Poetic

Sagitarrius Life
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
98,938
Reputation
19,769
Daps
480,993
Reppin
MLK BLVD
this tells u that the organization is cheap as fukk.

U have all this money, but u deciding to trade down so u don't spend money on the #5 pick :camby:

watch they trade down to #12 or some shyt and pick up a 3rd round pick and derek carr and the rest of the Qb's are already gone and what that leave them? picking AJ mccarron

This front office is a fukking mess
 

PTBG

Superstar
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
13,852
Reputation
1,571
Daps
16,756
Reppin
Cali
Have heard a couple times here that #Dolphins may cut LB Philip Wheeler. #Raiders would be very interested in bringing him back
:scusthov: Wheeler might have been the worst 43 outside LB last season, especially with all those missed tackes. Would be a nice back-up for depth, but not a starter.
Raiders interest Dolphins Chris Clemons, Vikings Everson Griffen & Packers Mike Neal. monitoring Walter Thurmond & Tarell Brown market
The Raiders signed cornerback Taiwan Jones to a three-year contract extension.
:obama: Really like how Taiwan has adjusted in special teams, good to see him back.
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,690
Daps
35,653
Reppin
NULL
McKenzie hasn't achieved anything noteworthy yet this offseason. Taiwan Jones is a special teams bum that will have little to no effect on Oakland's season overall. :comeon:
 

Hater

R.I.P
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
20,167
Reputation
3,800
Daps
47,840
Reppin
Lakers
Jason La Confora; CBS Sports

Michael Vick is one of the more attractive names available in a shallow free-agent market at quarterback and should have multiple options. A recent report linked him to the Jets, but league sources believe Jets GM John Idzik would not be inclined to spend in the range it would likely take to land Vick, and regardless, other teams are interested.

The Raiders are mulling several veteran quarterbacks, Vick included, and that looks like the best opportunity for Vick to start quickly. The Vikings, 49ers, Bucs and Texans are also exploring free agent options. If Matt Cassel does not return to Minnesota, Houston is seen as a likely landing spot for him.

Furthermore, the Eagles could end up keeping Vick, as he is well-liked and has a presence in their locker room, and also willingly accepted and handled losing the starting job to Nick Foles last season. Philadelphia has plenty of cap space and a veteran presence who already knows Chip Kelly's system certainly has value.

Several teams have interest in veteran Josh McCown, who thrived in a starting role for the Bears when Jay Cutler was injured last season, and he could be an option for New York as well, again, based on the club's willingness to spend.

:blessed:
 

Supreme

King
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
150,352
Reputation
23,543
Daps
381,853
Reppin
NC
628x471.jpg


Mark Davis Interview 2/26/14

Q: The NFL is a quarterback league. How important is it to get one, and how much has it set you back not having one?

A: In my opinion, the quarterback is the driving force in the league. As you can see right now. Everybody that is winning has a quarterback. But there are different ways to go about getting one. The Colts drafted Andrew Luck and built their team around him. Denver had the infrastructure and then plugged Peyton Manning in there. Kansas City, same thing. They had everything set up but just didn't have the quarterback - they were actually inept the year before and we beat them twice.

So, the way I look at it is you can't force it. If there is a guy there at No. 5 in the draft that you really believe can be your franchise quarterback - and he doesn't have to be your franchise quarterback this year, but somebody that will be in the next year or two - then you think about it. But if not, then pick another guy who is going to be a leader for your organization.

We have to find somebody in the draft or in free agency that is going to be the identity of the Raiders. I don't know if we really have an identity now.

The two guys that we've got, Terrelle (Pryor) and Matt (McGloin), are young guys that still need experience. Whether they get that here or not is to be seen.

Q: When you sit down with one of these young quarterbacks at the combine, what are you looking to see?

A: I think everybody is looking for something different, to be honest. I haven't really sat down with Reggie and Dennis to see what they're looking for in a quarterback, but I know what I am kind of looking for. We only interviewed six or seven of them, and I just wanted to see what they had to say. You're limited to the amount of people you can interview. Then, of course, there are the pro days.

Q: (Louisville quarterback Teddy) Bridgewater said you guys were laughing, having a ball in there.

A: He's a great guy. I like him a lot. ... They're all good guys.

Q: It is a very deep draft. Is taking the best player available the way to go, given all your needs?

A: I would think so. But I don't know if you can fully go with the best player available. My philosophy would be to start building the foundation of the team. Wide receiver - there are a lot of them this year - but I don't know if you can take a receiver at No. 5 because we have so many other needs for the foundation of the franchise. :ehh:

Q: With the roster upheaval the last couple of years and all the salary cap space available, would you say this is the Raiders' most important offseason in awhile?

A: Every offseason is the most important at that time, but this is one that we've been building toward the last few years. ... So, yeah, there is no question. We have to hit it right now. The coaches, they're all signed. Dennis Allen has every coach that he wanted. Everybody was all worried about that on the outside, but on the inside we knew what we were doing.

Reggie (McKenzie) has the fifth pick in the draft, and we have almost every one of our picks. We have to hit it now. :obama: (Thin ice McCaczie)

Q: Is this a put-up-or-shut-up season?

A: It's not put-up-or-shut-up, but there are no excuses.:salute: All right? When I said there was a deconstruction and a reconstruction period, that was to give an idea of what's actually been happening, but it's no excuse. In my mind.

It was a description. But at the same time, even though we've been deconstructing, that didn't mean we couldn't have been adding players over these last two years that could be part of the foundation of this franchise. And I am not so sure that we've done that yet.

Q: Is it safe to say you were disappointed in last season?

A: Absolutely. Yeah. I have been disappointed the last two years. I want to win.

Q: But given the roster cuts, you must have been braced for a little bit of a rocky road?

A: Absolutely. The deconstruction part has been done very well. I am just not sure that we put pieces in place. Like I said, I am still looking for the identity of this franchise.

Q: You've said that Reggie is your guy, from day one. What are your thoughts on the job that Dennis has done? Has he grown in your eyes a little bit?

A: He's Reggie's guy. Reggie is my guy. Reggie made a statement that I don't particularly agree with. I went to school in Chico, and 4-12 last year and 4-12 this year are the same thing to me. I don't find one better than the other. (Laughing) We do math differently at Chico State than they do in Tennessee.

Losing those last games last year was not good. And the way we lost them was terrible. But ... looking at the whole thing, this is where we are, and these guys have an opportunity to show what they can do. There are no built-in excuses anymore. :ahh:

Q: Did going 1-8 down the stretch give you any pause that you have the right guys in place?

A: When you're not winning, there are always thoughts. But you have to look at the whole picture. You can't act on emotion. You just can't do it. I see continuity being a good thing, but you have to have the right kind of continuity. I am giving these guys a chance to do it. It's tough at times. We had these games that we were ahead at halftime and then we lose them. It's hard to have patience when you see that. :smugbiden:Being patient is tough.

Q: Tough schedule next year. That won't be an excuse?

A: Hell, no. You just have to go out and win. :blessed:

Q: And you have $65 million in cap space. That has to be exciting.

A: It's absolutely exciting. The table is set for the Raiders to start building for the future. My goal is to get to multiple Super Bowls, not a one-and-done deal.

Q: I know you enjoy dealing with the fans. Does not having won for 12 years make that harder?

A: It hits me in the heart. Everybody, wherever you go, everybody loves the Raiders, the mystique. It's amazing. ... My real goal is to perpetuate the legacy of my father. I am not here to do anything for me. The Raiders are a way of life for a lot of people, and it's my responsibility to get that back, that pride, that poise, that commitment to excellence. Those things are things that people live by, and we have to get it back for them.


 

Bounty

All Star
Joined
Jul 11, 2013
Messages
2,667
Reputation
390
Daps
9,167
I heard demarcus ware might not be a cowboy next season

If clowney drops to us at 5

Ware and clowney:whew:





















Oh i forgot reggie mckenzie is our gm who will draft a cb:heh:
 

King Poetic

Sagitarrius Life
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
98,938
Reputation
19,769
Daps
480,993
Reppin
MLK BLVD
628x471.jpg


Mark Davis Interview 2/26/14

Q: The NFL is a quarterback league. How important is it to get one, and how much has it set you back not having one?

A: In my opinion, the quarterback is the driving force in the league. As you can see right now. Everybody that is winning has a quarterback. But there are different ways to go about getting one. The Colts drafted Andrew Luck and built their team around him. Denver had the infrastructure and then plugged Peyton Manning in there. Kansas City, same thing. They had everything set up but just didn't have the quarterback - they were actually inept the year before and we beat them twice.

So, the way I look at it is you can't force it. If there is a guy there at No. 5 in the draft that you really believe can be your franchise quarterback - and he doesn't have to be your franchise quarterback this year, but somebody that will be in the next year or two - then you think about it. But if not, then pick another guy who is going to be a leader for your organization.

We have to find somebody in the draft or in free agency that is going to be the identity of the Raiders. I don't know if we really have an identity now.

The two guys that we've got, Terrelle (Pryor) and Matt (McGloin), are young guys that still need experience. Whether they get that here or not is to be seen.

Q: When you sit down with one of these young quarterbacks at the combine, what are you looking to see?

A: I think everybody is looking for something different, to be honest. I haven't really sat down with Reggie and Dennis to see what they're looking for in a quarterback, but I know what I am kind of looking for. We only interviewed six or seven of them, and I just wanted to see what they had to say. You're limited to the amount of people you can interview. Then, of course, there are the pro days.

Q: (Louisville quarterback Teddy) Bridgewater said you guys were laughing, having a ball in there.

A: He's a great guy. I like him a lot. ... They're all good guys.

Q: It is a very deep draft. Is taking the best player available the way to go, given all your needs?

A: I would think so. But I don't know if you can fully go with the best player available. My philosophy would be to start building the foundation of the team. Wide receiver - there are a lot of them this year - but I don't know if you can take a receiver at No. 5 because we have so many other needs for the foundation of the franchise. :ehh:

Q: With the roster upheaval the last couple of years and all the salary cap space available, would you say this is the Raiders' most important offseason in awhile?

A: Every offseason is the most important at that time, but this is one that we've been building toward the last few years. ... So, yeah, there is no question. We have to hit it right now. The coaches, they're all signed. Dennis Allen has every coach that he wanted. Everybody was all worried about that on the outside, but on the inside we knew what we were doing.

Reggie (McKenzie) has the fifth pick in the draft, and we have almost every one of our picks. We have to hit it now. :obama: (Thin ice McCaczie)

Q: Is this a put-up-or-shut-up season?

A: It's not put-up-or-shut-up, but there are no excuses.:salute: All right? When I said there was a deconstruction and a reconstruction period, that was to give an idea of what's actually been happening, but it's no excuse. In my mind.

It was a description. But at the same time, even though we've been deconstructing, that didn't mean we couldn't have been adding players over these last two years that could be part of the foundation of this franchise. And I am not so sure that we've done that yet.

Q: Is it safe to say you were disappointed in last season?

A: Absolutely. Yeah. I have been disappointed the last two years. I want to win.

Q: But given the roster cuts, you must have been braced for a little bit of a rocky road?

A: Absolutely. The deconstruction part has been done very well. I am just not sure that we put pieces in place. Like I said, I am still looking for the identity of this franchise.

Q: You've said that Reggie is your guy, from day one. What are your thoughts on the job that Dennis has done? Has he grown in your eyes a little bit?

A: He's Reggie's guy. Reggie is my guy. Reggie made a statement that I don't particularly agree with. I went to school in Chico, and 4-12 last year and 4-12 this year are the same thing to me. I don't find one better than the other. (Laughing) We do math differently at Chico State than they do in Tennessee.

Losing those last games last year was not good. And the way we lost them was terrible. But ... looking at the whole thing, this is where we are, and these guys have an opportunity to show what they can do. There are no built-in excuses anymore. :ahh:

Q: Did going 1-8 down the stretch give you any pause that you have the right guys in place?

A: When you're not winning, there are always thoughts. But you have to look at the whole picture. You can't act on emotion. You just can't do it. I see continuity being a good thing, but you have to have the right kind of continuity. I am giving these guys a chance to do it. It's tough at times. We had these games that we were ahead at halftime and then we lose them. It's hard to have patience when you see that. :smugbiden:Being patient is tough.

Q: Tough schedule next year. That won't be an excuse?

A: Hell, no. You just have to go out and win. :blessed:

Q: And you have $65 million in cap space. That has to be exciting.

A: It's absolutely exciting. The table is set for the Raiders to start building for the future. My goal is to get to multiple Super Bowls, not a one-and-done deal.

Q: I know you enjoy dealing with the fans. Does not having won for 12 years make that harder?

A: It hits me in the heart. Everybody, wherever you go, everybody loves the Raiders, the mystique. It's amazing. ... My real goal is to perpetuate the legacy of my father. I am not here to do anything for me. The Raiders are a way of life for a lot of people, and it's my responsibility to get that back, that pride, that poise, that commitment to excellence. Those things are things that people live by, and we have to get it back for them.




EJ46aYf.gif


EJ46aYf.gif


NO MORE EXCUSES.. THAT'S RIGHT LITTLE D... ALLEN AND MCKENZIE BETTER MAKE IT HAPPEN
 

King Poetic

Sagitarrius Life
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
98,938
Reputation
19,769
Daps
480,993
Reppin
MLK BLVD
MARK DAVIS TRIP FROM HAWAII HAS THIS MAN ON A RAMPAGE AND I LOVE IT :blessed:

Owner Mark Davis: Oakland is on its 'last chance' to keep Raiders

The Raiders want a new stadium and if something doesn't happen soon, they might be leaving Oakland. Owner Mark Davis said this week that he wants to stay in the city where his team has been since 1995, but he needs to see some progress as far as stadium planning goes.

An investment group led by the world's third-largest privately held real estate firm, Colony Capital LLC, made headlines in October when they promised to redevelop the coliseum-area into a 'sports and entertainment center.'

"We are very enthusiastic about the opportunity… to develop this unique property, which we expect will become a transformational and vital urban, residential sports and entertainment center for [Oakland]," Colony CEO Thomas J. Barrack, Jr. said in October, via the Oakland Tribune.

If Colony Capital's plans fizzle out though, the Raiders will likely be leaving Oakland.

"I don't want to call it a last-ditch effort, but it does seem to be the last chance that Oakland is going to get," Davis told the San Francisco Chronicle. "We can't continue to play in that stadium, with the baseball field and all of that stuff."

The Raiders lease at O.co Coliseum actually expired after the 2013 season and the team could've looked at moving to another city, but Davis and the Raiders agreed to a one-year extension to stay in Oakland. Davis made the agreement with hopes of seeing the stadium project move forward in 2014.

The Colony Capital deal looked promising when it was announced in October, but almost five months later, Davis hasn't heard anything regarding the project moving forward.

"They brought in Colony Capital and based on that, I decided to go ahead and do a one-year extension with them. But there's been no progress," Davis said. "I had high hopes when Colony Capital came in. I still do have hopes, but they're not as high because I haven't really heard anything positive from either group. It's gone silent again. We have to get something done."

If something doesn't get done, then 2014 could be the Raiders final year in Oakland. However, Davis didn't want to talk about a possible move to another city, "I don't want to talk about using someplace else for leverage," Davis said. "If I get something done in Oakland, I am staying."

The Raiders had a chance to move-in with the 49ers at their new stadium, but Davis decided that wasn't in the best interest of his team. That's a decision he still doesn't regret, "I really believe with the 49ers moving down to Santa Clara, and leaving the San Francisco Bay Area, that it leaves it wide open for someone to say, 'Wow, this is really a good opportunity for Oakland,' Davis said.

Besides the stadium deal, Davis touched on several topics during his lengthy interview with the Chronicle, which you can read here. If you're a Raiders fan, or you just want to read about Davis calling the 2012 Chiefs 'inept,' it's worth a click.
 

Hater

R.I.P
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
20,167
Reputation
3,800
Daps
47,840
Reppin
Lakers
Move the Raiders back to LA have them play in the coliseum or rose bowl and make that deal with Ed Roski to build a stadium.

Roski recently dropped his demand for a free minority share of the NFL franchise that relocates to Los Angeles in exchange for his 600-acre lot in the City of Industry and is now committed to buying a minority share of the team at fair market value in exchange for the land.

http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/nfl/...s-nfl-stadium-developer-ed-roski-drops-demand

Dude only wants to be a minority owner and he'll get a stadium build.
 
Top