The Official Knicks offseason thread

Trip

slippery slope
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
21,396
Reputation
262
Daps
18,337
Reppin
FL
See you always saying you think you think as if you have more insight than anyone else . I know the Sas is on speaking terms with worldwide Wes but they not best friends. He's trying to Suck up to him
To get back in good with bron who doesn't speak to him anymore. These are things he said Sas not my opinion . And let me ask you this one more time has grunwald earned the benefit of the doubt? He rebuilt our weakness the bench into our strength and picked up lin

Grunwald has too many ties to Isiah for me to truly believe he's making every personel decision.

question for you, do you want Lin back and do you think the Knicks really do?
 

Prodyson

All Star
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
3,891
Reputation
991
Daps
11,329
Here's the way I see it... If the Knicks sign Lin, it's because they don't think they can find a viable shooting guard...

If they don't sign Lin, then we should be looking out for the Knicks signing a shooting guard to the roster.

If they can get somebody like Matt Barnes somehow... I say let Lin go. If they can't get someone like that, at least. Then Dolan needs to eat that bill and sign Lin. Cause in the end, he can prevent the big hit if Lin isn't worth it. And if Lin is worth it, then who cares.

But I have a question... If the Knicks waive Lin using the "Stretch" provision.... and somebody picks Lin up off waivers... What happens with 15 mil then.

Or if Lin clears waivers and somebody signs him for say 3 or 4 mil.... is only 11 mil being paid over the 3 year time period?
 

BAMBA

The Menace
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
4,780
Reputation
1,340
Daps
18,035
But I have a question... If the Knicks waive Lin using the "Stretch" provision.... and somebody picks Lin up off waivers... What happens with 15 mil then.

Or if Lin clears waivers and somebody signs him for say 3 or 4 mil.... is only 11 mil being paid over the 3 year time period?

I was wondering about this myself. Unfortunately, "sports analysts" like Stephen A. Smith are too busy screaming on camera and being personalities to actually provide sports analysis...so I'm not sure.

Has SAS even mentioned the stretch provision in his rants?

:sitdown:
 

Trip

slippery slope
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
21,396
Reputation
262
Daps
18,337
Reppin
FL
I was wondering about this myself. Unfortunately, "sports analysts" like Stephen A. Smith are too busy screaming on camera and being personalities to actually provide sports analysis...so I'm not sure.

Has SAS even mentioned the stretch provision in his rants?

:sitdown:

1050(home of the NY Knicks coincidentally) hasnt touched it at ALL.

the only one that did was Evan Roberts this morning...
 

ThaBronxBully

Postin’ & Toastin’ Since 02’
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,194
Reputation
8,228
Daps
115,576
Reppin
NYC
SAS Stance Is That Lin Is Flat Out Not Worth That Kind Of Money, He Doesn't Wanna Hear About Provisions Or Trade Assets Or Not Couting Toward The Cap Or Dolans Pockets

Whether Its Good Or Bad For The Knicks His Stance Is Basically Dont Give Lin The Money Cuz He's Average And Will Always Be Average :yeshrug:
 

mvp_status

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
12,410
Reputation
1,972
Daps
37,461
What's this I'm hearing about this chunky fukk Felton refusing to get in shape this summer?
 

ThaBronxBully

Postin’ & Toastin’ Since 02’
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,194
Reputation
8,228
Daps
115,576
Reppin
NYC
David Aldridge Says The Knicks Should Keep Lin

Finally A Respected Guy With A Brain Weighs In, I Suggest Everyone Read This


Aldridge Weighs In: Why Knicks Should Keep Jeremy Lin « NBA.com | Hang Time Blog

"I have no dog in this hunt. I’m neither a Knicks fan nor a hater. But it seems clear that, while the Knicks would certainly be paying above market and basketball value for Lin by matching the offer sheet, the implications of not doing so could bring even greater risk. And, even if it turns out Lin is a complete bust, it doesn’t have to be nearly as punitive in that potentially toxic third year for New York as people are making it out to be."
 

JMurder

SOHH Member since 01...
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,627
Reputation
1,082
Daps
20,405
Reppin
Bronx, NYC
Here's the way I see it... If the Knicks sign Lin, it's because they don't think they can find a viable shooting guard...

If they don't sign Lin, then we should be looking out for the Knicks signing a shooting guard to the roster.

If they can get somebody like Matt Barnes somehow... I say let Lin go. If they can't get someone like that, at least. Then Dolan needs to eat that bill and sign Lin. Cause in the end, he can prevent the big hit if Lin isn't worth it. And if Lin is worth it, then who cares.

But I have a question... If the Knicks waive Lin using the "Stretch" provision.... and somebody picks Lin up off waivers... What happens with 15 mil then.

Or if Lin clears waivers and somebody signs him for say 3 or 4 mil.... is only 11 mil being paid over the 3 year time period?
:what:
SAS Stance Is That Lin Is Flat Out Not Worth That Kind Of Money, He Doesn't Wanna Hear About Provisions Or Trade Assets Or Not Couting Toward The Cap Or Dolans Pockets

Whether Its Good Or Bad For The Knicks His Stance Is Basically Dont Give Lin The Money Cuz He's Average And Will Always Be Average :yeshrug:
But...but....but....he was 85%!!!!!!!
David Aldridge Says The Knicks Should Keep Lin

Finally Respected Guy With A Brain Weighs In, I Suggest Everyone Read This



:pachaha:
Aldridge Weighs In: Why Knicks Should Keep Jeremy Lin « NBA.com | Hang Time Blog

"I have no dog in this hunt. I’m neither a Knicks fan nor a hater. But it seems clear that, while the Knicks would certainly be paying above market and basketball value for Lin by matching the offer sheet, the implications of not doing so could bring even greater risk. And, even if it turns out Lin is a complete bust, it doesn’t have to be nearly as punitive in that potentially toxic third year for New York as people are making it out to be."
 

A-Train

Express.
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
3,477
Reputation
230
Daps
5,423
Reppin
NULL
Alan Hahn ‏@alanhahn
“@KnicksFanBlog: @alanhahn 2x + 1 year” So for instance, if Knicks waive Lin before Year 3, that $14.9M cap hit is spread over 3 years.

Alan Hahn ‏@alanhahn
For those asking, “Stretch Provision” allows team to waive player and spread cap hit over 2x length of remaining contract. Eases tax hit.

Alan Hahn ‏@alanhahn
Yes, “stretch provision” does give ‪#Knicks‬ some potential relief on the $14.9M balloon year for Lin. Definitely something in consideration.
 
Top