tremonthustler1
aka bx_representer
The notion of trading Lin later is ridiculous because people will be as attached to him later as they are now.
See you always saying you think you think as if you have more insight than anyone else . I know the Sas is on speaking terms with worldwide Wes but they not best friends. He's trying to Suck up to him
To get back in good with bron who doesn't speak to him anymore. These are things he said Sas not my opinion . And let me ask you this one more time has grunwald earned the benefit of the doubt? He rebuilt our weakness the bench into our strength and picked up lin
Grunwald has too many ties to Isiah for me to truly believe he's making every personel decision.
question for you, do you want Lin back and do you think the Knicks really do?
But I have a question... If the Knicks waive Lin using the "Stretch" provision.... and somebody picks Lin up off waivers... What happens with 15 mil then.
Or if Lin clears waivers and somebody signs him for say 3 or 4 mil.... is only 11 mil being paid over the 3 year time period?
I was wondering about this myself. Unfortunately, "sports analysts" like Stephen A. Smith are too busy screaming on camera and being personalities to actually provide sports analysis...so I'm not sure.
Has SAS even mentioned the stretch provision in his rants?
What's this I'm hearing about this chunky fukk Felton refusing to get in shape this summer?
he said he likes coming into camp heavy because he feels stronger
he said he likes coming into camp heavy because he feels stronger
Here's the way I see it... If the Knicks sign Lin, it's because they don't think they can find a viable shooting guard...
If they don't sign Lin, then we should be looking out for the Knicks signing a shooting guard to the roster.
If they can get somebody like Matt Barnes somehow... I say let Lin go. If they can't get someone like that, at least. Then Dolan needs to eat that bill and sign Lin. Cause in the end, he can prevent the big hit if Lin isn't worth it. And if Lin is worth it, then who cares.
But I have a question... If the Knicks waive Lin using the "Stretch" provision.... and somebody picks Lin up off waivers... What happens with 15 mil then.
Or if Lin clears waivers and somebody signs him for say 3 or 4 mil.... is only 11 mil being paid over the 3 year time period?
But...but....but....he was 85%!!!!!!!SAS Stance Is That Lin Is Flat Out Not Worth That Kind Of Money, He Doesn't Wanna Hear About Provisions Or Trade Assets Or Not Couting Toward The Cap Or Dolans Pockets
Whether Its Good Or Bad For The Knicks His Stance Is Basically Dont Give Lin The Money Cuz He's Average And Will Always Be Average
David Aldridge Says The Knicks Should Keep Lin
Finally Respected Guy With A Brain Weighs In, I Suggest Everyone Read This
Aldridge Weighs In: Why Knicks Should Keep Jeremy Lin « NBA.com | Hang Time Blog
"I have no dog in this hunt. I’m neither a Knicks fan nor a hater. But it seems clear that, while the Knicks would certainly be paying above market and basketball value for Lin by matching the offer sheet, the implications of not doing so could bring even greater risk. And, even if it turns out Lin is a complete bust, it doesn’t have to be nearly as punitive in that potentially toxic third year for New York as people are making it out to be."
he said he likes coming into camp heavy because he feels stronger
The notion of trading Lin later is ridiculous because people will be as attached to him later as they are now.