The Official FIFA World Cup Thread - QATAR 2022

WHO WILL WIN?


  • Total voters
    144
  • Poll closed .

thatrapsfan

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
17,695
Reputation
1,833
Daps
53,706
Reppin
NULL
Seeing how Denmark was atrocious and finished last in their group, why would you want more of that? And Denmark actually has talent in their squad unlike Eastern European and Baltic countries. These 3rd tier UEFA teams are terrible, at most they have one star player and then don't come close to filling the rest of their team with players that get regular burn in top five leagues.

You're always going to have a couple of big teams like Italy/Nigeria have an off year and miss out on the tournament but making sure they get in doesn't justify having 14 more terrible teams.
It was simply an example to show there isn’t a huge drop off between current WC teams and those potentially added to the mix. Hyperbole to argue that likes of Sweden,Colombia, Peru, Egypt, Algeria, Nigeria, CIV, Mali, Chile are terrible teams or would embarrass themselves in an expanded format. That’s 9 teams named right there. I don’t really care about the additional Euro spots, but I am generally in favour of more cross federational matches that matter. We very rarely ever see it outside of the World Cup and my take is that it won’t turn out as bad as predicted in 2026. We’ll see.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,845
Reppin
the ether
:laugh: And some people want to have a whole group stage with groups of 4 teams again :mjlol: Nah, groups of 3 is good then let's get straight to knocking fools out.


Considering the competition it'll be their own fault if anyone good gets knocked out first round, but having groups where everyone goes 1-1 in their two matches is going to be weird.
 

cobra

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 24, 2017
Messages
11,371
Reputation
-1,281
Daps
50,051
Saw this in another forum, who the additional 16 teams would have been if we had a 48 team World Cup this year based on qualifying results.

The drop-off doesn't seem that huge to me, aside from possibly AFC and CONCACAF. I want to see this :manny:


UEFA: Ukraine, Sweden, North Macedonia
CONMEBOL: Peru, Colombia
CAF: Egypt, Algeria, Nigeria, Mali
AFC: UAE, Oman
CONCACAF: Panama, Jamaica
OFC: New Zealand
Two of: Chile, DR Congo, Iraq, El Salvador, Honduras, Solomon Islands
this will dilute the tournament
it should be prestigious and hard to get in
with 48 teams any decent soccer nation will get in

qualifiers will be meaningless
 

cobra

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 24, 2017
Messages
11,371
Reputation
-1,281
Daps
50,051
arg, brazil, france and portugal are the dream semi-finalists

however, I think one of those don't make it
 

nyknick

refuel w/ chocolate milk
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
18,714
Reputation
6,060
Daps
90,733
It was simply an example to show there isn’t a huge drop off between current WC teams and those potentially added to the mix. Hyperbole to argue that likes of Sweden,Colombia, Peru, Egypt, Algeria, Nigeria, CIV, Mali, Chile are terrible teams or would embarrass themselves in an expanded format. That’s 9 teams named right there. I don’t really care about the additional Euro spots, but I am generally in favour of more cross federational matches that matter. We very rarely ever see it outside of the World Cup and my take is that it won’t turn out as bad as predicted in 2026. We’ll see.
I understand your thought process but I just disagree. I think that, using UEFA as an example, there is already a big drop off from A-tier to B-tier teams, so adding more B-tier teams (which were not good enough to qualify with current rules) would bring nothing of value to the World Cup.

Just look at some of these teams in Europe that missed out: Scotland, Turkey, Macedonia, Ukraine, Albania. EURO group stages are usually snooze fests with a lot team lacking quality and opting to play defensively. CONCACAF and AFC are even worse.

It's true that situation is different in CAF qualifying, so I would rather look to create an inter-conference playoff for CAF vs. UEFA teams rather than expanding WC so we have to watch Teemu Pukki and 10 scrubs park the bus for 90 minutes.
 

phcitywarrior

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
13,263
Reputation
4,550
Daps
32,157
Reppin
Naija / DMV
It's true that situation is different in CAF qualifying, so I would rather look to create an inter-conference playoff for CAF vs. UEFA teams rather than expanding WC so we have to watch Teemu Pukki and 10 scrubs park the bus for 90 minutes.

This I could get behind..redistribution of slots. 1/2 from UEFA to CAF..and an intercontinental spot
 

thatrapsfan

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
17,695
Reputation
1,833
Daps
53,706
Reppin
NULL
I understand your thought process but I just disagree. I think that, using UEFA as an example, there is already a big drop off from A-tier to B-tier teams, so adding more B-tier teams (which were not good enough to qualify with current rules) would bring nothing of value to the World Cup.

Just look at some of these teams in Europe that missed out: Scotland, Turkey, Macedonia, Ukraine, Albania. EURO group stages are usually snooze fests with a lot team lacking quality and opting to play defensively. CONCACAF and AFC are even worse.

It's true that situation is different in CAF qualifying, so I would rather look to create an inter-conference playoff for CAF vs. UEFA teams rather than expanding WC so we have to watch Teemu Pukki and 10 scrubs park the bus for 90 minutes.
Fair enough, good points overall, and would be fully behind your inter conference suggestion. Fait accompli at this stage though so :manny: we will see how it goes
 
Top