The Official Coli International Infrastructure/Public works appreciation/unappreciation thread.

Macallik86

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
6,529
Reputation
1,392
Daps
21,305
here's a snippet:
The “work from home” revolution has been very good for political columnists who like to write shirtless in pajama pants and share too much personal information with their readers. But the phenomenon hasn’t been so great for America’s cities.

The nation’s office buildings aren’t as empty as they were before COVID vaccines became widely available in spring 2021. But they’re still far less populated than they were in 2019. A recent analysis of Census Bureau data from the financial site Lending Tree found that 29 percent of Americans were working from home in October 2022. In New York City, financial firms reported that only 56 percent of their employees were in the office on a typical day in September.

Full-time remote work has grown less prevalent since the worst days of the pandemic. But flexible work arrangements — in which employees report to the office a couple times a week — are proving stickier. A recent paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research estimated that 30 percent of all full-time workdays would be performed remotely by the end of 2022.

As Insider’s Emil Skandul illustrates in an excellent piece, these surveys and projections are buttressed by mobile phone data showing that, in virtually all major U.S. cities, foot traffic in central business districts is down substantially from 2019.

https%3A%2F%2Fpyxis.nymag.com%2Fv1%2Fimgs%2F67d%2F85a%2Ff61b2531d12aea9c6f676165e4998b27f1-downtowns-recovery-chart.h480.jpg




Chicago is putting some moves in motion already by fielding proposals:
 
Last edited:

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
56,441
Reputation
8,326
Daps
158,311
here's a snippet:





Chicago is putting some moves in motion already by fielding proposals:



 

Macallik86

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
6,529
Reputation
1,392
Daps
21,305
Randomly read another infrastructure article this week, I always knew parking lots were an inefficient (albeit profitable) use of land, but the article touches on gov't mandating parking lots for companies that don't even want them and how more progressive govt's are moving away from that.

I'm hoping that repurposed downtowns = less people requiring cars = less parking lots, and that that leads to a continuous cycle.

They are grey, rectangular and if you lumped their population of up to 2bn together they would cover roughly the same area as Connecticut, about 5,500 sq miles. Car parking spaces have a monotonous ubiquity in US life, but a growing band of cities and states are now refusing to force more upon people, arguing they harm communities and inflame the climate crisis.

These measures, along with expansive highways that cut through largely minority neighborhoods and endless suburban sprawl, have cemented cars as the default option for transportation for most Americans.



‘There’s no train, there’s no bus, there’s no anything that supports mass transportation. It doesn’t exist.’
‘It’s just more and more lanes’: the Texan revolt against giant new highways
Read more

From January, though, California will become the first state to enact a ban on parking minimums, halting their use in areas with public transport in a move that governor Gavin Newsom called a “win-win” for reducing planet-heating emissions from cars, as well as helping alleviate the lack of affordable housing in a state that has lagged in building new dwellings.

Several cities across the country are now rushing doing the same, with Anchorage, Alaska, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Nashville, Tennessee, all recently loosening or scrapping requirements for developers to build new parking lots. “These parking minimums have helped kill cities,” said Gernot Wagner, a climate economist at Columbia Business School who accused political leaders of making downtowns “look like bombs hit them” by filling them with parking lots. [...]
The rest of the article can be read here:
 
Top