It's true breh. Oscar gave FLOYD an opportunity, not the other way around....which is exactly why Oscar debo'd that nikka at the negotiating tables, and wasn't shyt Floyd could do about but accept every single thing Oscar wanted.
Oscar was the PPV King and still is 2nd all-time. He was the biggest draw by far in the sport, Floyd was nothing in comparison to him at the time.
If Oscar said "No" to fighting Floyd....no "Money" Mayweather would've even had the chance to begin. That's all facts.
No its not. Not the same at all.
It's like this:
Terence Crawford (Floyd Mayweather) is mostly known by hardcore fans of the sport. He faces Manny Pacquiao (Oscar De La Hoya) and wins....he becomes known in the mainstream. If Manny (Oscar) says NO to fighting Crawford (Mayweather)....then what? Crawford (Mayweather) still remains a hardcore fan favorite, but unknown by casuals, and has to find another route to the top of the sport. He doesn't get to become "Cash Out" Crawford ("Money" Mayweather) without Manny Pacquiao (Oscar De La Hoya) giving him the chance & that rub.
The DLH vs Trinidad fight was boring?
Why, because DLH clearly outboxed him to a wide decision win (it should've been a wide UD for DLH
) just like Floyd outboxed Pacquiao to a wide decision win
Nah, neither of them fights were boring and when I hear that, I automatically give people the
.