Did jean pascal win?
Heard it was a bizarre NC
Did jean pascal win?
No he fukking didn't. I'm really going to need you to explain to me why you posted a gif of James Toney to make a point instead of posting a gif of the punch. He knocked out Geale with thisforeman threw arm punches but not like this. foreman loaded up and swung for the fences. you could see the power. you could understand it. golovkin... you cant. he knocked out geale with this
saying some people just have freakish power is a non answer and its a cop out. i want to understand boxing. i dont want to believe in magic and thinks things just happen just because of mystical forces. i want boxing to make sense and not have to fall for hype.
It was a joke unless pascal has freakish power all of a sudden.Heard it was a bizarre NC
Golovkin is LOADING THE fukk UP on a BIG right hand, gets tagged in the middle of the BIG, SLOW, OBVIOUS WIND UP, but the punch is LIGHT and thus he's able to FINISH THE HUGE, OBVIOUS, POWERFUL, SLOW WIND UP. He and Geale started throwing at the SAME TIME but Geale's SHORTER, QUICKER PUNCH got there in half the time. GGG caught Geale with a fukking HAYMAKER. At the start of his punch we see his chest, at the end, we see his back. He put his arms, shoulders, and hips into that shot. In what universe does that look like a pull-counter, arm punch?
thats not a haymaker. it doesnt matter how much capslock and boldfont you want to post to make that punch into the haymaker narrative you need it to be to stan gloveking
you brought up technique so lets talk about technique. look at his legs. look at his followthrough.
he is falling over and no weight goes over onto the front leg at the end of the punch. thats means its an arm punch. when that arm punch connects it doesnt go through geale. you know that it doesnt go through geale because the punch stops as soon as it connects instead of driving through after it connects. throws it as a hook but doesnt turn it over which is why it looks like a right jab at the end of the punch instead of the right hook that it started out as. these are facts not a narrative.
i posted that view because you can really see what golovkins legs are doing. you can see his legs just arent under him and that he was falling over while hes punching. you said he turned his hips. we can see that was a lie. i see these kinds of things and i try to add it all up. the only way to justify this is to say golovkin has freakish power. i agree. the difference is when you look at the controversy surrounding golovkin who now has racked up two funny looking knockouts back to back, fighters themselves bringing his gloves into question, fighters constantly getting cut early in consecutive fights, a growing amount of people starting to question golovkin, gloves doing things in pictures gloves arent supposed to do, its creating a growing case about the nature of that power. you cant ignore that and not take that into consideration when you see a punch like the one he hit geale with.
maybe so but its a growing list of things about golovkin that need to be called into question. we had to do it with margarito retroactively and looking back it all made sense why he was doing things like ripping fighters ears off in fights. but if you dont follow things blindly you dont have to look back retroactively. and pacquiao never knocked guys out cold with a arm punch.pacquiao knocks dudes out with his back leg in the air. freakish power exists in boxing.
honestly I don't even care about the feet or follow through, just look at geale's neck.....that shyt got sent back into his shoulders. the punch obviously landed with force.
thats not a haymaker. it doesnt matter how much capslock and boldfont you want to post to make that punch into the haymaker narrative you need it to be to stan gloveking
you brought up technique so lets talk about technique. look at his legs. look at his followthrough.
he is falling over and no weight goes over onto the front leg at the end of the punch. thats means its an arm punch. when that arm punch connects it doesnt go through geale. you know that it doesnt go through geale because the punch stops as soon as it connects instead of driving through after it connects. throws it as a hook but doesnt turn it over which is why it looks like a right jab at the end of the punch instead of the right hook that it started out as. these are facts not a narrative.
i posted that view because you can really see what golovkins legs are doing. you can see his legs just arent under him and that he was falling over while hes punching. you said he turned his hips. we can see that was a lie. i see these kinds of things and i try to add it all up. the only way to justify this is to say golovkin has freakish power. i agree. the difference is when you look at the controversy surrounding golovkin who now has racked up two funny looking knockouts back to back, fighters themselves bringing his gloves into question, fighters constantly getting cut early in consecutive fights, a growing amount of people starting to question golovkin, gloves doing things in pictures gloves arent supposed to do, its creating a growing case about the nature of that power. you cant ignore that and not take that into consideration when you see a punch like the one he hit geale with.
it did. whats being called into question is where it came from.the punch obviously landed with force.
maybe so but its a growing list of things about golovkin that need to be called into question. we had to do it with margarito retroactively and looking back it all made sense why he was doing things like ripping fighters ears off in fights. but if you dont follow things blindly you dont have to look back retroactively. and pacquiao never knocked guys out cold with a arm punch.