You did say defacto mandatory. Unfortunately defacto mandatories isn't a fact or a thing in boxing. You're either a mandatory or you're not. And again, Loma wouldn't be a mandatory to the Kambosos v Haney winner, like I said.
I agree Loma v Haney for undisputed would be a big fight but you said Haney v Loma would be an "insane payday", which I found laughable and wholly misguided. My lol smdh was in regards to that. Keep up son.
And I think Haney wouldn't fight Loma if he fought and beat Kambosos because he would have no reason to. He'd be undisputed and like I said before, wouldn't even remain at the weight cuz like I said before hes having trouble making the weight and would probably vacate and move up to 140.
Haney is independent? I coulda sworn he was a DAZN/Matchroom fighter...
I didn't ignore that Haney has a belt, wtf are you talking about? Like I said, if Loma fought Kambosos, I have no doubt he'd fight Haney afterwards SINCE Haney has a belt and Lomas goal is to become undisputed. If Haney fought Kambosos, he'd have no incentive to fight Loma afterwards since Loma doesnt have a belt and Haney would be undisputed. Nobody is fighting Loma if they don't have to. And I brought up the rankings to highlight my point that Loma is deserving of a shot at the titles since he's ranked higher than Haney in all the rankings.
I purposely separated my points to make this easier for you to follow. I hope it worked. And like I said, you're entitled to believe and want whatever fight you want bro. I'm not trynna change your mind. But saying the #2 fighter in the division doesn't deserve a shot at the titles is weird to me. But hey, I'll accept it as your opinion. I just vehemently and respectfully disagree.