Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
40,102
Reputation
20,344
Daps
126,327
MW has done it. She reached the 65,000!

Now the fun begins :mjlit:
qqsj28.gif
 

AlainLocke

Banned
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
16,258
Reputation
2,670
Daps
74,051


But..but..but.. only internet nikkas talk like this :skip:

But...but...but.. Tone; Yvette, and Tariq don’t speak for normal black folk :skip:


I tell people the internet is the collective unconsciousness of people. It's realer than the so called real world.

I think after decades of talking about the color of skin and simply calling racism a bad character trait and calling people like Tiger Woods social progress for Black folk, we are back on track talking about real shyt.

Racism is ultimately about wealth distribution. Everything else is about White people avoiding paying what they owe because they know by their own laws and beliefs slavery was unjust.

You can't talk about freedom, democracy, property, and then own slaves lol.
 

HarlemHottie

Uptown Thoroughbred
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
17,777
Reputation
10,796
Daps
74,379
Reppin
#ADOS
Next time somebody asks you why we 'destroy our own neighborhoods' :comeon:

Historians and anthropologists of slavery (as well as scholars in other fields) have in recent decades produced an abundance scholarship on what is often called ‘everyday resistance.’ Theorizers of everyday resistance point out that resistance need not occur within the context of organized political movements or involve violence.28 Everyday forms of slave resistance, unlike armed rebellion, were generally non-violent and included acts such as feigning illness to get off work.29 Scholarly treatment of everyday (sometimes termed ‘passive’ or ‘peaceful’) slave resistance dates at least as far back as 1942, with the publication of Raymond and Alice Bauer’s article “Day to Day Resistance to Slavery” in the Journal of Negro History. The Bauers cite self-mutilation, the destruction of plantation property, and the deliberate slowing down of work as examples of slave resistance in the antebellum American South.30

Infanticide as Slave Resistance: Evidence from Barbados, Jamaica, and Saint-Domingue

Our ghettoes are not our own. We still conceptualize them as plantations, which they are. :ld:

Thanks for the link @Nicole0416, been reading articles for the past hour. Rep. :salute:
 

saturn7

Politics is an EXCHANGE!!!
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
12,012
Reputation
2,710
Daps
58,508
Reppin
DMV Freedman
Biden Confronted About Crime Bill, Says ‘It Didn’t Generate Mass Incarceration… The Black Caucus Supported It’


Biden Confronted About Crime Bill, Says 'It Didn't Generate Mass Incarceration... The Black Caucus Supported It'


Former Vice President and current Democratic presidential primary frontrunner Joe Biden was confronted about his 1994 crime bill, and delivered a lengthy defense that included the claim that “it didn’t generate mass incarceration,” and that the “[Congressional] Black Caucus supported it.”

During a campaign event in Nashua, New Hampshire, it was Biden who first brought up the “good part” of the crime bill by bragging about the assault weapons ban and other gun control measured contained therein.

But during the Q&A period, an audience member named Catherine confronted Biden about the “bad part,” and the former VP delivered a rather full-throated defense of the legislation.

“So I’m going to bring up the bad part of the crime bill that you sort of referenced,” she said. “I’m curious how you’re going to really repair a lot of the black and brown communities that have been ravaged by the war on drugs and mass incarceration, and not necessarily high-level policies aimed at all people living in poverty, but specifically people who are institutionally and structurally in poverty because of magic incarceration and the war on crime.”

“Folks, let’s get something straight,” Biden said. “92 out of every 100 prisoners end up behind bars are in a state prison, not a federal prison. This idea that the crime bill generated mass incarceration, it did not generate mass incarceration.”


Biden then launched into a lengthy defense of the crime bill, saying it was “about prevention, and that “there were no more mandatories, except two that I had to accept.”

“One was that President Clinton wanted three strikes and you’re out,” he said, and went on to say that the other was for “carjacking,” both of which he says he opposed.

“What happened is, the mass incarceration occurred by the states setting mandatory sentences,” Biden said, and noted that “if you go back and look, the black caucus supported the bill.”

Biden said that “The big mistake in the crime bill on drugs was one that Pat Monahan, and he’s a great guy, remember that the crack of epidemic came from the Bahamas. And we were told by medical doctors at the time that because it permeated the membrane of the brain more quickly, it was the ‘crack you never come back,’ it was somehow fundamentally different than someone in a beautiful neighborhood like this sniffing a line of cocaine.”

“I’ve been trying to change that since it passed,” Biden continued, and then noted that following the election of President George W. Bush, the gun control provisions in the bill were allowed to expire.

“So folks, we don’t need any more mandatory sentences,” Biden said, in conclusion. “The biggest mistake in that bill was, in my view, was making crack cocaine and powder cocaine a different sentence. They should not be mandatory sentences.”

Biden is correct that the Congressional Black Caucus supported the 1994 crime bill(which Biden’s current chief competitor, Senator Bernie Sanders also voted for), but the bill did encourage mass incarceration by granting billions of dollars to states that enacted tougher sentencing laws.

Watch the clip above, via ABC.

:hhh:


Fukk outta here. Yvette pulled his card all the way last night.
 
Top