Damn, that game in fugazi 4K...rough living.
Being aired on ESPN isn't a flex anymore considering it hasn't improved it's broadcast quality in like 8 years.
The main event cuzzo
Damn, that game in fugazi 4K...rough living.
Being aired on ESPN isn't a flex anymore considering it hasn't improved it's broadcast quality in like 8 years.
See my last postThey are though
Real shyt though. This one of them years I feel like MSU, PSU, & Wisconsin gonna be up so I don’t see nobody running the table in the Big TenSee my last post
Y'all really bout to make it 3 in a row...
Negged
Real shyt though. This one of them years I feel like MSU, PSU, & Wisconsin gonna be up so I don’t see nobody running the table in the Big Ten
Feel like Illinois won’t drop off too much either.
Nah we gotta figure out who our QB gonna be first. Sark gonna throw his bag at us againTide by 3 scores
Like he did Arkansas?Nah we gotta figure out who our QB gonna be first. Sark gonna throw his bag at us again
The P5 have no pathway out of that status and there is no defined pathway into it either. It was essentially a self-selected group based mainly on financial clout, with no set of competitive metrics defining it, and passed by the NCAA membership. However, the autonomy debate is for another day. If the autonomy construct continues to exist, it should be treated as just that, an “inside baseball” NCAA-created legislative structure that does not confer “power” status in the competitive arena, and that is also exclusionary. The written in stone nature of that structure is another primary reason why it should not determine power status in the public conversation.
Whenever a so-called non-P5 school wins the national championship in men’s basketball, as the American did in 2014, three national championships in women’s basketball, as the American did in 2014, 2015 and 2016, or makes the College Football Playoff, as the American did in 2021, or in addition makes (seven times) and wins (four times) a New Year’s Day Bowl game against a top ten team or makes the men’s Final Four and the Elite Eight and the Sweet Sixteen, how are those teams “non-power”? It is absurd, and proof that the power moniker makes no sense competitively. The fact that so-called P5 teams that have not achieved at that level are still deemed “power” teams is an absurdity on its face. Another absurdity involves realignment, where Group of Five teams instantly become Power Five teams simply by signing a piece of paper.
It is time to retire the P5 moniker and shift the focus and nomenclature to the ten FBS conferences. We at the American strongly support that concept and urge the media to focus on the ten FBS conferences. Each FBS conference should be judged and characterized on whether it has achieved elite status, on whether it is powerful in its own right, and not as the beneficiary of an arbitrary label. We have no illusions about the difficulty of achieving change in this area, but this is a battle worth fighting.
Let's see what second tier brand that Great Value Michigan goes with this time. Riddell?
Their shyt just looks weird especially alternate uniforms. They're better than adidas but so are most high schools' uniforms.I doubt all the teams signed to under armor are resigning when their contracts expire. UA might be shyt out of luck soon. Auburn’s got a couple years left with UA and I doubt they resign too
I think that UA is getting out of the team appeal business because they been losing money for the past couple of years. I know that UCLA had to go to Jordan Brand after UA asked to get out of the contract.I doubt all the teams signed to under armor are resigning when their contracts expire. UA might be shyt out of luck soon. Auburn’s got a couple years left with UA and I doubt they resign too