The OFFICIAL 2023 College Football RANDOM THOUGHTS Thread

PREDICT the NATIONAL CHAMPION


  • Total voters
    105
  • Poll closed .

Silkk

Thats My Quarterback :to:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
190,657
Reputation
19,220
Daps
481,949
See my last post
Real shyt though. This one of them years I feel like MSU, PSU, & Wisconsin gonna be up so I don’t see nobody running the table in the Big Ten

Feel like Illinois won’t drop off too much either.
 

DropTopDoc

20/20 Vision With my Buffs On
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
37,726
Reputation
5,690
Daps
77,331
Reppin
South Side Chicago to Nola
Y'all really bout to make it 3 in a row...:wow:


:blessed: the tide swinging back blue


:ufdup: Negg’n a black man 3 months post black history, shame
Real shyt though. This one of them years I feel like MSU, PSU, & Wisconsin gonna be up so I don’t see nobody running the table in the Big Ten

Feel like Illinois won’t drop off too much either.

Idk what Wisconsin will be, i feel like middle of the pack or they gon run it, Luke still needs some pieces and to get that line in order

Psu goes as far as drew/Franklin takes them, which i don’t think is too far

It be nothing short of a miracle if msu comes out beastin
 

mozichrome

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Messages
83,464
Reputation
3,038
Daps
118,873
Reppin
NULL
your conference winner beats USC in that Cotton Bowl and commish start wanting to make demands




The P5 have no pathway out of that status and there is no defined pathway into it either. It was essentially a self-selected group based mainly on financial clout, with no set of competitive metrics defining it, and passed by the NCAA membership. However, the autonomy debate is for another day. If the autonomy construct continues to exist, it should be treated as just that, an “inside baseball” NCAA-created legislative structure that does not confer “power” status in the competitive arena, and that is also exclusionary. The written in stone nature of that structure is another primary reason why it should not determine power status in the public conversation.

Whenever a so-called non-P5 school wins the national championship in men’s basketball, as the American did in 2014, three national championships in women’s basketball, as the American did in 2014, 2015 and 2016, or makes the College Football Playoff, as the American did in 2021, or in addition makes (seven times) and wins (four times) a New Year’s Day Bowl game against a top ten team or makes the men’s Final Four and the Elite Eight and the Sweet Sixteen, how are those teams “non-power”? It is absurd, and proof that the power moniker makes no sense competitively. The fact that so-called P5 teams that have not achieved at that level are still deemed “power” teams is an absurdity on its face. Another absurdity involves realignment, where Group of Five teams instantly become Power Five teams simply by signing a piece of paper.

It is time to retire the P5 moniker and shift the focus and nomenclature to the ten FBS conferences. We at the American strongly support that concept and urge the media to focus on the ten FBS conferences. Each FBS conference should be judged and characterized on whether it has achieved elite status, on whether it is powerful in its own right, and not as the beneficiary of an arbitrary label. We have no illusions about the difficulty of achieving change in this area, but this is a battle worth fighting.
 

Sauce Dab

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 28, 2015
Messages
47,304
Reputation
15,450
Daps
249,636


Let's see what second tier brand that Great Value Michigan goes with this time. Riddell?

I doubt all the teams signed to under armor are resigning when their contracts expire. UA might be shyt out of luck soon. Auburn’s got a couple years left with UA and I doubt they resign too
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
67,675
Reputation
10,944
Daps
235,844
Reppin
206 & 734
I doubt all the teams signed to under armor are resigning when their contracts expire. UA might be shyt out of luck soon. Auburn’s got a couple years left with UA and I doubt they resign too
Their shyt just looks weird especially alternate uniforms. They're better than adidas but so are most high schools' uniforms.
 

OSUBaneBrowns

Ohio to California
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
5,947
Reputation
823
Daps
16,089
Reppin
Long Beach, CA
I doubt all the teams signed to under armor are resigning when their contracts expire. UA might be shyt out of luck soon. Auburn’s got a couple years left with UA and I doubt they resign too
I think that UA is getting out of the team appeal business because they been losing money for the past couple of years. I know that UCLA had to go to Jordan Brand after UA asked to get out of the contract.
 
Top