If they trade for George, it's highly unlikely that he signs an extension this year. The Celtics aren't going to give up Brown or Tatum for a rental. I think the pick they got from Philly could be in play as well. But even without the Philly pick I think the Celtics could have the best offer for George on the table. The question is why Hayward and George long term? I actually like the thought of both for a year, with George moving on.
Off the rip, they have to shed Mickey, Zeller & Jackson.
Neither Semi or Nader are locks to make the roster.
Yabu or Zizic, it won't be both and there is a possibility both could be stashed again.
I don't see Olynyk making the roster either.
Even without George & Hayward they still have to make a decision on Bradley, Smart, Thomas and Rozier. I only see two of these guys on the roster next year. Without the pump faking nonsense, the Celtics roster has to go through a major overhaul.
Moreover, Brown's needs to start. It makes no sense for players who aren't going to be apart of the Celtics future taking minutes away from him. I think Tatum assumes the role Brown had last year.
Lastly Malta is right about this, if it is George & Hayward long term you have one swingman too many. Maybe Tatum could play some 4 in the future but right now he's a 3 and so is Hayward. Brown could play the 2 but you'd have to play George at the 2 since he says he wont play PF.
