1984 brehs
The question "why do we even have a DEA" just struck me brehs
It means the failed war on drugs( people of color) can get worseblah!.
I'm torn on this. On the one hand we can assume this practice does stop criminals on the other hand... wait what's the other hand?
Are they using this to set up good people? Or just criminals?
Again I'm torn here. The state is clearly recording shyt, we know this and quite frankly NOTHING is going to be done to stop this. Now in the course of this information gathering if they are able to discover that a crime is going to take place and they then place police in that area why not? What would worry me is the possibility of entrapment, which is a concern. Outside of that what's wrong with busting drug dealers?Doesn't the state have a duty to convict someone of being a criminal or engaging in criminal behavior first?
Agreed. Again my only concern would be entrapment. BUT if you're doing dirt already and the man finds out why not stop a criminal?This means that the process in which the conviction happens is tainted because the information leading up to the arrest is not fully disclosed properly to the defense (hell, sometimes even the prosecutors and judges according to the report).
that makes sense from a security standpoint.The most damning part of the report to me was that charges against these "criminals" were dropped completely in cases where they feared exposing of this intelligence gathering methods.
The war on drugs is a bust AND it's disproportionately heavy against brown folks, particularly in smaller possession type charges. That didn't sound like what they were using this info for. This sounded more like they were hitting truckloads and the such. If so then again what's wrong with busting drug dealers?I don't really feel comfortable with that, especially considering this only means the failed War on Drugs is only expanding, which means more prisoners, especially minority prisoners.
Well, I'm not surprised. The whistle blower on this secret project might get deep-sixed though.
Anyway, if you have a person riding dirty, but they don't do anything illegal while getting followed, then he can't get pulled over.
Big stuff is obvious and stupid: running through a red light, speeding 20 MPH over the speed limit, or driving a car without license plates.
Criminals are more careful, the cops have to look for any traffic violation to get probable cause to conduct a traffic stop. Brake light bulb is out? Didn't use a turn signal while changing lanes? Didn't come to a complete stop at a stop sign? Driving without headlights on after sundown? Driving 1 MPH over the speed limit? Air freshener pine tree hanging from the rear view mirror? They are all probable cause.
i think his point was that if they want to pull you over they will find a reason. Which per cops i've known is pretty fukin accurate. Even to the point where i've heard stories of them stopping at payphones to call in "suspicious looking vehicles" that just so happen to fit the vehicle you're in so that they can stop you.Wrong. It's impossible to stay at 45 mph exactly for the whole time driving etc.
i think his point was that if they want to pull you over they will find a reason. Which per cops i've known is pretty fukin accurate. Even to the point where i've heard stories of them stopping at payphones to call in "suspicious looking vehicles" that just so happen to fit the vehicle you're in so that they can stop you.
Who don't the police? Unless something has changed I was under the impression they do. Now what constitutes probable cause can be paper thin in terms of legitimacy. But they do need it...right?That's not probable cause though. That was MY point. They don't need probable cause to pull you over.
Who don't the police? Unless something has changed I was under the impression they do. Now what constitutes probable cause can be paper thin in terms of legitimacy. But they do need it...right?
actually this is harassment, get a badge number.Nah, they can pull you over for whatever and be like 'just seeing where you're going "mjpls:"
this is true.It's that they need consent to search your car OR probable cause to search it. If they discover illegal shyt when illegally searching your car it's thrown out in court and you're clean without any charges. This doesn't even go to court if it is found out to be an illegal search beforehand.
Well, I'm not surprised. The whistle blower on this secret project might get deep-sixed though.
Anyway, if you have a person riding dirty, but they don't do anything illegal while getting followed, then he can't get pulled over.
Big stuff is obvious and stupid: running through a red light, speeding 20 MPH over the speed limit, or driving a car without license plates.
Criminals are more careful, the cops have to look for any traffic violation to get probable cause to conduct a traffic stop. Brake light bulb is out? Didn't use a turn signal while changing lanes? Didn't come to a complete stop at a stop sign? Driving without headlights on after sundown? Driving 1 MPH over the speed limit? Air freshener pine tree hanging from the rear view mirror? They are all probable cause.
Yes, but it depends on your jurisdiction.Were you being serious with this one though