The NSA is giving your phone records to the DEA. And the DEA is covering it up.

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,554
Reputation
3,352
Daps
54,322
Reppin
CALI
blah!.
I'm torn on this. On the one hand we can assume this practice does stop criminals on the other hand... wait what's the other hand?

Are they using this to set up good people? Or just criminals?
It means the failed war on drugs( people of color) can get worse
 

unit321

Hong Kong Phooey
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,214
Reputation
1,815
Daps
23,103
Reppin
USA
Well, I'm not surprised. The whistle blower on this secret project might get deep-sixed though.
Anyway, if you have a person riding dirty, but they don't do anything illegal while getting followed, then he can't get pulled over.
Big stuff is obvious and stupid: running through a red light, speeding 20 MPH over the speed limit, or driving a car without license plates.
Criminals are more careful, the cops have to look for any traffic violation to get probable cause to conduct a traffic stop. Brake light bulb is out? Didn't use a turn signal while changing lanes? Didn't come to a complete stop at a stop sign? Driving without headlights on after sundown? Driving 1 MPH over the speed limit? Air freshener pine tree hanging from the rear view mirror? They are all probable cause.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
Doesn't the state have a duty to convict someone of being a criminal or engaging in criminal behavior first?
Again I'm torn here. The state is clearly recording shyt, we know this and quite frankly NOTHING is going to be done to stop this. Now in the course of this information gathering if they are able to discover that a crime is going to take place and they then place police in that area why not? What would worry me is the possibility of entrapment, which is a concern. Outside of that what's wrong with busting drug dealers?
This means that the process in which the conviction happens is tainted because the information leading up to the arrest is not fully disclosed properly to the defense (hell, sometimes even the prosecutors and judges according to the report).
Agreed. Again my only concern would be entrapment. BUT if you're doing dirt already and the man finds out why not stop a criminal?

The most damning part of the report to me was that charges against these "criminals" were dropped completely in cases where they feared exposing of this intelligence gathering methods.
that makes sense from a security standpoint. :manny:

I don't really feel comfortable with that, especially considering this only means the failed War on Drugs is only expanding, which means more prisoners, especially minority prisoners.
The war on drugs is a bust AND it's disproportionately heavy against brown folks, particularly in smaller possession type charges. That didn't sound like what they were using this info for. This sounded more like they were hitting truckloads and the such. If so then again what's wrong with busting drug dealers?

The other question is are innocent people being framed or is it just that criminals, who are clearly engaging in criminal activity are upset because the rules are being broken?
 

Brown Ant

Hunter-Gatherer
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
2,229
Reputation
-195
Daps
1,584
Reppin
a colony near you
Well, I'm not surprised. The whistle blower on this secret project might get deep-sixed though.
Anyway, if you have a person riding dirty, but they don't do anything illegal while getting followed, then he can't get pulled over.
Big stuff is obvious and stupid: running through a red light, speeding 20 MPH over the speed limit, or driving a car without license plates.
Criminals are more careful, the cops have to look for any traffic violation to get probable cause to conduct a traffic stop. Brake light bulb is out? Didn't use a turn signal while changing lanes? Didn't come to a complete stop at a stop sign? Driving without headlights on after sundown? Driving 1 MPH over the speed limit? Air freshener pine tree hanging from the rear view mirror? They are all probable cause.

Wrong. It's impossible to stay at 45 mph exactly for the whole time driving etc.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
Wrong. It's impossible to stay at 45 mph exactly for the whole time driving etc.
i think his point was that if they want to pull you over they will find a reason. Which per cops i've known is pretty fukin accurate. Even to the point where i've heard stories of them stopping at payphones to call in "suspicious looking vehicles" that just so happen to fit the vehicle you're in so that they can stop you.
 

Brown Ant

Hunter-Gatherer
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
2,229
Reputation
-195
Daps
1,584
Reppin
a colony near you
i think his point was that if they want to pull you over they will find a reason. Which per cops i've known is pretty fukin accurate. Even to the point where i've heard stories of them stopping at payphones to call in "suspicious looking vehicles" that just so happen to fit the vehicle you're in so that they can stop you.

That's not probable cause though. That was MY point. They don't need probable cause to pull you over.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
That's not probable cause though. That was MY point. They don't need probable cause to pull you over.
Who don't the police? Unless something has changed I was under the impression they do. Now what constitutes probable cause can be paper thin in terms of legitimacy. But they do need it...right?
 

Brown Ant

Hunter-Gatherer
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
2,229
Reputation
-195
Daps
1,584
Reppin
a colony near you
Who don't the police? Unless something has changed I was under the impression they do. Now what constitutes probable cause can be paper thin in terms of legitimacy. But they do need it...right?

Nah, they can pull you over for whatever and be like 'just seeing where you're going "mjpls:"

It's that they need consent to search your car OR probable cause to search it. If they discover illegal shyt when illegally searching your car it's thrown out in court and you're clean without any charges. This doesn't even go to court if it is found out to be an illegal search beforehand.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
Nah, they can pull you over for whatever and be like 'just seeing where you're going "mjpls:"
actually this is harassment, get a badge number.
It's that they need consent to search your car OR probable cause to search it. If they discover illegal shyt when illegally searching your car it's thrown out in court and you're clean without any charges. This doesn't even go to court if it is found out to be an illegal search beforehand.
this is true.
IF they stop you "just to see where you're going" and you have a dead guy in the back seat...you just lucked the fuk out.
 

Dooby

إن شاء الله
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
8,383
Reputation
-411
Daps
10,408
Well, I'm not surprised. The whistle blower on this secret project might get deep-sixed though.
Anyway, if you have a person riding dirty, but they don't do anything illegal while getting followed, then he can't get pulled over.
Big stuff is obvious and stupid: running through a red light, speeding 20 MPH over the speed limit, or driving a car without license plates.
Criminals are more careful, the cops have to look for any traffic violation to get probable cause to conduct a traffic stop. Brake light bulb is out? Didn't use a turn signal while changing lanes? Didn't come to a complete stop at a stop sign? Driving without headlights on after sundown? Driving 1 MPH over the speed limit? Air freshener pine tree hanging from the rear view mirror? They are all probable cause.

Were you being serious with this one though
 

unit321

Hong Kong Phooey
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,214
Reputation
1,815
Daps
23,103
Reppin
USA
Were you being serious with this one though
Yes, but it depends on your jurisdiction.
The violation in Virginia is § 46.2-855. Driving with driver's view obstructed or control impaired. Hanging a CD, fuzzy dice, Mardi Gras beads, or air freshener off the rear-view mirror is considered obstructing your view. Most of the time, people get away with it because it's not a big deal. But, it gives probable cause where a cop can write a ticket for it and it can stick in court. It does obstruct you view partially. You can try to challenge it if you ever get that ticket, but why bother. Don't hang anything. That's my freebie for all y'all that don't like to get pulled over.
 
Top