the next democrat has to offer tangibles to men and openly reject lgbt feminism babble.. or they will lose

[Rekkapryde]

I think if a woman candidate were picked by voters in the primary, they would have a legit chance. Hillary and Kamala were not picked by voters but by corporations and individuals who had a lot of money.

I have zero faith in wypipo and America.

The only woman who might have a chance is a Republican one. That's it.

 

[Uachet]

Come on now. Twitter is one of largest disinformation platform around. Until recently, it was the largest liberal leaning SM platform. Musk didn't buy it for shyts and giggles. Foreign and corporate donors didn't loan him money for the meme. The right wing all but controls new media and the flow of information.


You saying Kamala doesn't have policies is exactly the problem. All she did was talk about them. Trump didn't. He's said as much. Its why he ran from the second debate. He hasn't provided any plans to help the areas you mentioned. Economic or otherwise. His first initiative is to hunt illegals. Who does this help? His half-baked tariff talk has economists confused and people who pay attention worried.

I watched every interview and town hall meeting she had. The only policy she could articulate well on was Abortion. Her ideas of more grants and forgivable loans were not policies the American people wanted. Also, she was unable to answer very direct questions made by Journalists who actually asked tough questions or the voters who asked her direct questions about any issue other than Abortion.

So her talking about her policies were mainly overly used synonym laced avoidance answers that did not engender in the populous any faith in her ability to lead. This is why on issues like illegal immigration and the economy, more people trusted Trump over her. Only on the issue of Abortion was she trusted more than Trump.

Despite Struggles, Trump Still Leading Harris On Economy, Immigration​

Despite struggles, Trump still leading Harris on economy, immigration

Donald Trump is polling better than Kamala Harris on the economy and immigration, despite his overall lead shrinking in national and battleground state polls.

www.newsweek.com

 

[O.Red]

"A new report shows the Harris-Walz campaign and its Democratic allies spent nearly $1.4 billion on aired political ads in their failed bid to defeat President-elect Trump, outspending the 45th president and Republicans by nearly $460 million."



She spent more than $460million than Trump, so even with Elon Musk spending it did not even come close to what her spending was. She ran a bad campaign that did not ignite the Democratic electorate to come out and vote for her. One main problem was her inability to articulate solutions to problems many Democrats had, because her Corporate handlers would not allow her.

This problem will remain with every candidate in the Democratic party, if they are beholden to corporate money. It also shows though, that the most money does not always translate into the most votes.

People really keep trying to swerve around how atrocious her campaign was

 

[Lakers Offseason]

I have zero faith in wypipo and America.

The only woman who might have a chance is a Republican one. That's it.

There are more Democratic voters than Republican voters. The Republicans only win when those Democrat voters don't show up. Which means that if the party nominates a candidate everyone can get excited for, they will more than likely win. Crackers voted for a black man with a foreign name. Not once, but twice. A white woman can win if it's the white woman the party can be excited about.

 

[Rekkapryde]

There are more Democratic voters than Republican voters. The Republicans only win when those Democrat voters don't show up. Which means that if the party nominates a candidate everyone can get excited for, they will more than likely win. Crackers voted for a black man with a foreign name. Not once, but twice. A white woman can win if it's the white woman the party can be excited about.

we've really only had 2 true democratic wins in the last 44 years (Clinton and Obama). Biden was Obama by extension. and now that the largest minority group (hispanics) have more pull than us with their nearly 50% support of Republicans (and that number is growing), it's gonna be a problem.

I def agree they need to find someone ultra charismatic who isn't a panderer to far left shyt. Bills and Baracks don't grow on trees.

 

[Rick Fox at UNC]

Also need to get away from abortion being the only issue the candidate speaks passionately about.

Jobs, immigration, foreign policy, economy, family, and culture all matter to the vat majority of Americans.

 

[TheNig]

on point.

but what do you do with the Latinos? they're more important voting wise than even us now.

Any Mexican and Cuban agendas should probably be abandoned at this point. Republicans made absolutely no pitch for anything to benefit them and they still voted for him. They've picked they're side.

Focus on the PRs. They're more important to the Demos than trying to get Cubans and Mexican to try to like them.

 

[Rekkapryde]

Any Mexican and Cuban agendas should probably be abandoned at this point. Republicans made absolutely no pitch for anything to benefit them and they still voted for him. They've picked they're side.

Focus on the PRs. They're more important to the Demos than trying to get Cubans and Mexican to try to like them.

on point

 

[Formerly Black Trash]

Any Mexican and Cuban agendas should probably be abandoned at this point. Republicans made absolutely no pitch for anything to benefit them and they still voted for him. They've picked they're side.

Focus on the PRs. They're more important to the Demos than trying to get Cubans and Mexican to try to like them.

Yup

 

[Uachet]

People really keep trying to swerve around how atrocious her campaign was

Until they recognize what the real problems were, they will always misplace the blame for why she lost. I just hope the actual experts don't follow the same thought process too many brothers on this website are following.

I am still flabbergasted that they think she was a great interviewer.

 

[EndDomination]

A bait thread as always from Malc - but this is a sentiment I've seen from some of the dumbest motherfukkers on the internet.

"Tangibles" isn't a real thing (at least not the way you sambos use it) and undermining vulnerable populations is a receipt for disaster for any voter bloc left of the Nazi Party.

Now: 1) a federal minimum wage increase; 2) rollback of anti-union legislation; 3) ending the car dealership oligopoly; 4) going even further with the FTC regulations and 5) environmental protection are all *really* strong campaign add-ons.

Unfortunately, the campaign for 2028 is going to be largely about undoing whatever Trump has fukked up.

 

[AquaCityBoy]

Honestly the next candidate just needs to be a white man. That’s literally it.

Fixed.

 

[Stick Up Kid]

Every Political Party has a "doomsday" type week after an election lost..

truth is, after Trump, nobody will galvanize the Base like he did. Dems will be fine in 2028

 

[EndDomination]

Until they recognize what the real problems were, they will always misplace the blame for why she lost. I just hope the actual experts don't follow the same thought process too many brothers on this website are following.

I am still flabbergasted that they think she was a great interviewer.

They're legitimately so used to either Donald or Joe's incoherent ramblings that anything else seems excellent by comparison.

 

[EndDomination]

Every Political Party has a "doomsday" type week after an election lost..

truth is, after Trump, nobody will galvanize the Base like he did. Dems will be fine in 2028

This is also quite true - but it will also be easy for the 5-6% of Republicans who switched sides of sat out to jump back in for a "regular" right-wing GOP candidate.