He literally says he "HE HAS EVERY REASON TO LIE, BUT I'M OBLIGATED TO BELIEVE THE SKETCHY GUY." I just watched that scene again.
And as much as I love his work, having a man make the decision FOR THE VICTIM, to not do the piece, is when Sorkin is at his worst.
Alleged victim. Thats the point where it looks like me and you disagree on.
I dont think the word "believe" was meant to be taken literally. I dont think Don was saying since there were no charges, that means he thinks those guys are telling the truth and shes lying. I think what he was saying is that hes obligated to protect those who have not been found guilty (not even tried...not even arrested), especially when her version has no witnesses nor any corroborating evidence.
When watching the episode in its entirety its obvious Sorkin made it kinda ambiguous as to what really happened (if it was in fact a rape) but I think he made it apparent Don felt like there was an actual rape. But to the bigger picture whether or not those guys raped her was kinda irrelevant. The relevant point was creating a public forum for anonymous people to claim they were raped by other people. Theres nothing to stop me from posting on that website that HHR raped me...then going on your facebook page and sending the links to all your friends/teachers/bosses or some shyt.
I also dont think Don "made the decision" for the girl. I think he wanted to persuade her not to do the show. Which regardless of how you feel, is the right call. They would have turned a newsroom into the Jerry Springer show. 2 different versions of a story put on the air...the general public taking sides and slinging mud back and forth. Both of their lives could potentially be ruined...the only people that profit would be ACN thru the ratings boost. Thats the problem Don had. I thought he was showing genuine concern for the girl. I still felt it was ultimately HER choice whether or not she would do the show, but in the end she agreed with him.
I thought the part where he said something like, "this type of rape.." and she interrupts him and says, "there are no types of rape. you are raped, or you are not raped. i was raped" or something to that effect was cool too. I wish we lived in a world where that were true. Fact of the matter is thats not the way it goes. There are varying degrees of consent, and varying degrees of rape....some of which are more heinous than others. Just like there are varying degrees of murder (homicide, manslaughter, etc)...and varying degrees of theft (shoplifting, grand theft auto, etc).
I read something about this girl. She had consensual sex with a guy. While in the act, he flipped her over n started hittin it doggy. While fukkin her from the back he stuck his thumb in her a$$hole. She was saying that although she gave him consent to penetrate her vagina, she never gave him consent to penetrate her a$$hole. So therefore, she feels like she was raped. Its really tough for me to imagine that guy deserves to go to prison for rape...which is why I support the idea that there are different types of rape.