The newest @matt504 troll

[Big Boda]

You know a neg hurt when a MF screenshot it and say "look at this neg I got yall"

"keep fukkin wit meeeee everybody!"

Stay yo ass mad.

 

[Ronnie Lott]

Everything is "c00n shyt" to you guys.

Do you agree that black people shouldn't congregate unless we're doing something "constructive"

 

[GoldTeef]

yes. first off, since i know you are a dumb nikka very much in need of education i will break some things down for you, dumb nikka:

83% percent of poor people are either children, old people, people with disabilities, students, people taking care of family members, or people who can’t find jobs-- children, elderly and disabled making up the bulk of this.

so when you talk about force sterilizing the poor this is who you would be targeting, dumb nikka.

there are a number of programs that we have already that have done quite a lot to reduce poverty, dumb nikka

social security is the major one as it has dramatically reduced elderly poverty since benefits began rising in the 60s Social Security and Elderly Poverty

SSI, TANF, disability insurance, veterans benefits, unemployment all lift people out of poverty. without these programs there would be many more impoverished

food stamps, eitc, child tax credit are proven to reduce poverty significantly

SNAP pulled 4million people pulled out of poverty in 2012 Census: SNAP Lifted 4 Million People Out of Poverty in 2012 and Reduced Hardship for Millions More | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

eitc and the child tax credit pulled 9.4 million people out of poverty in 2013
EITC and Child Tax Credit Promote Work, Reduce Poverty, and Support Children’s Development, Research Finds | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

though these programs are successful, overall we spend way too little on poverty as compared with the rest of the developed world which is a big part of why our child poverty rates are so high.

welfare is very good and reduces poverty greatly.

a more robust welfare state would dramatically reduce poverty and, by making it affordable to have children, actually give women the ability to make their own family choices--choices that you wish to deny them, dumb nikka.

I think this is important.

According to


http://freakonomics.com/2011/06/10/the-rich-vs-poor-debate-are-kids-normal-or-inferior-goods/

"In a related paper, Alice Schoonbroodt and Michele Tertilt say that, “There is overwhelming empirical evidence that fertility is negatively related to income in most countries at most times.” They are right. Whether you cut the data across countries, through time, or across people at a point in time, the same fact arises: The richer you get, the fewer kids you have."

@Matt504 what are your thoughts on this? Could reducing poverty solve the problem of a large number of people having children they cannot afford?

 

[Matt504]

I think this is important.

According to


http://freakonomics.com/2011/06/10/the-rich-vs-poor-debate-are-kids-normal-or-inferior-goods/

"In a related paper, Alice Schoonbroodt and Michele Tertilt say that, “There is overwhelming empirical evidence that fertility is negatively related to income in most countries at most times.” They are right. Whether you cut the data across countries, through time, or across people at a point in time, the same fact arises: The richer you get, the fewer kids you have."

@Matt504 what are your thoughts on this? Could reducing poverty solve the problem of a large number of people having children they cannot afford?

reducing poverty could help, entitlement benefits are reducing poverty right this very minute yet people are still having children they can't afford.

 

[GoldTeef]

Do you agree that black peoples shouldn't congregate unless we're doing something "constructive"

the idea sound interesting but I haven't heard the reason behind it yet.

 

[Ronnie Lott]

the idea sound interesting but I haven't heard the reason behind it yet.

Let's try this again? Yes or no

Do you agree that black people shouldn't congregate unless we're doing something "constructive"

 

[Matt504]

the idea sound interesting but I haven't heard the reason behind it yet.

minimize conflict by minimizing contact.

 

[Kitsch]

I literally had this discussion earlier with my girlfriend and the answer is yes.

"but but but you wouldn't be here"


so what? my parents would have had less strain in their lives not raising two children in poverty.

Lol.

 

[AintNoCrampInYaMouthTho]

Not only is sterilization is stupid its also inhuman. How do even suggest to take away what a female is meant do away. What type of black person say some bullshyt like that.

if we can somehow breed the darker members of the Black race out of the equation by only procreating with non Black lighter skinned people, we might be able to overcome visually looking black in about 50-60 years if done correctly.

Israel already gave us the outline with the forced sterilization of ethiopeans, if darker african americans are forced to be sterilized in America, we could simultaneously cut down on abortions, while gradually assimilating into the dominant society.

I know there are trolls but some mofos take that shyt too far. What type of wicked shyt is this.

 

[omnifax]

I think this idea is a little too extreme. I believe education is really the key. Start on these children early with sex education and also economic education so they can understand from several angles why they shouldn't have children until they are financially stable. I would not trust ANY government to carry out something of this size and scope with transparency and void of descrimination/racism. At my pharmacy I see girls coming in to buy plan-b all the time and they do this because they have been taught that having children should be held off until you can properly care for them. So once again to re-iterate education is the key.

 

[GoldTeef]

entitlement benefits are reducing poverty right this very minute yet people are still having children they can't afford.

hmmmm, maybe:thinkan:

Let's try this again? Yes or no

Not sure yet, still learning about it.

 

[Turk]

I put him on ignore and kept it moving. I dont do the back and forth thing

 

[Ronnie Lott]

hmmmm, maybe:thinkan:





Not sure yet, still learning about it.

Its a very simple question that requires a very simple yes or no answer.

What more do you need to "learn about?

I've just backed you into a corner at this point. And you're afraid that by answering yes or no, I can therefore demolish your weak ass argument

 

[Matt504]

Its a very simple question that requires a very simple yes or no answer.

What more do you need to "learn@ about?

I've just backed you into a corner at this point. And you're afraid that by answering yes or no, I can therefore demolish your weak ass argument

for arguments sake, lets say he answered yes, what would you respond with to 'demolish' his argument?

 

[GoldTeef]

I've just backed you into a corner at this point.

no, you haven't.

You've asked me 'do you agree or disagree with this idea that you know little about'

And you're afraid that by answering yes or no, I can therefore demolish your weak ass argument

What arguments? How can I argue for something I know nothing about?