the irony, when all you do is deflect and post smileys when you cant counter an argument you go ahead and cook though peasant.
Ironic when I'm the only person here discussing the argument at hand when everyone else is name calling.
the irony, when all you do is deflect and post smileys when you cant counter an argument you go ahead and cook though peasant.
you really going to sit there and lie like there aren't any posters in here actually debating with you on the topic and not name calling? im done this dude officially a trollIronic when I'm the only person here discussing the argument at hand when everyone else is name calling.
the irony, when all you do is deflect and post smileys when you cant counter an argument you go ahead and cook though peasant.
I assume that mods aren't going to give him the timeout that he needs for his white supremacist trolling.
More abortions is a terrible solution just like throwing more money at a failing business is a terrible idea. At some we've gotta admit that it's time restructure the business model.
you really going to sit there and lie like there aren't any posters in here actually debating with you on the topic and not name calling? im done this dude officially a troll
I agree. Past 2 kids, poor ppl should be sterilized. . This goes for black, white, Hispanic, Asian whatever. I'm tired of seeing women with 5 kids in tow, yet can't control nary a one of them and milking that assistance cause Papa(s) not around. The world is overpopulated as it is and they're only making it worse. What do y'all think is gonna happen 50 years from now when the there are 3 times as many ppl all competing for the same limited resources?
Abortions are for when contraceptives and other birth control fail obviously. More funding for programs such as planned parenthood is the way. Also as others have mentioned forced sterilization has been tried on more than one occasion and has failed/ been abused every time.
That's why I suggested voluntary sterilization and anyone who opts out and has more than one child they can't afford should be denied any extra benefits they'd traditionally receive for an additional child.
go back to st0rmfr0ntI believe it's by design, I've been saying this for as long as I've been a member here, with that being said, the problem still exists, children are being birthed into poverty and the entire family suffers and it leads to people making poor decisions because "I can't allow my family to go to sleep without eating".
This isn't about hating poor people, it's about realistic solutions to problems that plague poor people, having more babies is not a solution, accident babies are not a solution, having a child while living in poverty and the father does nothing to support that child while he's off making even more children is not a solution, all of these problems can be nipped in the bud if the male had a reversible vasectomy and couldn't lay his eggs all over town creating babies he can't afford, the woman can have her tubes tied so she can't birth children until she's in a better financial situation and has planned for it.
I do hate the capitalist system, but we live in it and if we're not destroying the system the alternative is to change things we do have control over like whether or not we birth new children into poverty.
Oh I missed that. That somes a little more reasonable.
Out of curiosity. How old do you think people should be to opt in for sterilization? If under 18 should they have parental consent? What happens to people who opt out or too young to opt in who are victims of rape/incest?