originally, when they were expertly playing the role culturally.
you gave them marks based on their contribution.
off the fact they appeared to be a good march in a certain direction.
which i will admit,..as a critic when the late nineties sales spike era creared erosion.
defrading the game critically,..you were forced to either stop listening to rap.
or go back and give sort of a respect to more old school way of thought sentiments. when it came to music, being released and watch with a keen eye.
from the perspective of it maybe growing into something better via ramping up.
when it became painfully obvious.
no one really was capable of ramping up.
as their skillsbase were technically flawed and inferior, purposefully.
from lack of study or culturally not being aware of emcee'n all together.
plus the old school way of thought was phased out originally.
as it had reached its apex.
when the new school way of thought took over for only about a decade.
now,..we see how degradative and poisonous.
ultimately embracing old school way of thought sentiments past their time is.
i think you will see critics who have a longer history. rating albums music wise, closer to what they are as a long term submission culturally, and skillwise.
as records used to be rated in the original envelope of the new school way of thought.
nas's lp was rated accurrately by fantano.
if you know of fantano and how he rates music and why.
plus he gave an incredible elaborate review of the lp.
which others have not and simply lied or exposed they were a payola noob bot.
with a pedestrian understsnding of what makes a rap record really great.
not just following the bulk of mindless toy like sheep.
who now all inhabit the rap world by sheer over population and saturation.
who think their measily overcrowded population is the actual voice of hiphop.
art barr