the part of evolution i dont agree with is that the mutations themselves are completely "random" and in no way were effected by the environment that organsim lived in, and even to an extent the experiences that organism had. that to me goes against every other natural law in the universe. things affect each other, thats just the way it is. we are an organism that is downloading and assimilating trillions of bits of information about our environment every minute, both consciously and unconsciously, and you're telling me that has NOTHING to do with the genetic changes that take place over time? we even change and "mutate" in response to simple things like tropical and arctic climates, but in terms of evolution we are in mutating in a vacuum of space separate from everything else?
You should do your due diligence and study up to attain a basic knowledge before typing up a response. That is the only way this stuff works. If you dont even have a basic knowledge (which your post suggests) then we cannot discuss. Youre whiffing on stuff they teach in biology 101. Where did you even get such information from?
Its pretty easy to comprehend. If you dont have a basic understanding of the theory, we cannot discuss its merits. These nikkaz puttin up arguments against strawmen. You showin ya ignorance maynewhat the fukk does this supposed to mean? Typical response from a nikka that don't know shyt himself.
Actually religion and science go to together and science is sometimes theory. God made things evolved. The intelligent lifeform or designer is God, thats the mystery science trying to figure.
LeyeT said:the part of evolution i dont agree with is that the mutations themselves are completely "random" and in no way were effected by the environment that organsim lived in
The actual real probability is 1.0 if we're using observation.
Just a quick question for atheists: When, would you say, did the atheist movement really pick up steam? What year, decade or century? Just place a timetable on it for me if you can.
Only part of it was luck. It's not like *poof* out comes a human from nature. Once the first cell was created, the laws of physics and biology provided a track for many species to be evolved from it. Indeed if the situation played out all over again, perhaps humans would never have evolved to be humans. So there is some luck involved but we are the way we are because we adapted to the environment we were living in.If a person refuses to accept the fact we were created with both precision and purpose then theyre only left with one alternative explanation; we are the product of fortunate happenstance. A lucky accident
But it wouldnt be a lucky accident even if we evolved to be something else we'd just be something else. Just like a few million years down the line, we may be something else if we exist. I doubt we will though, I am fairly certain a theist will "push the button" and end human existence on the planet well before then.Only part of it was luck. It's not like *poof* out comes a human from nature. Once the first cell was created, the laws of physics and biology provided a track for many species to be evolved from it. Indeed if the situation played out all over again, perhaps humans would never have evolved to be humans. So there is some luck involved but we are the way we are because we adapted to the environment we were living in.
But nvm that. Even if it is a lucky accident. So what?