The Long-Shot Candidate Who Has the White House Worried - Joe Biden has a Cornel West problem.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,905
Reppin
the ether
Bernie dominated hypothetical polls. Who would even honestly respect those poll results? The primary wasn't over yet. It's a hypothetical match up. Thats like asking if Superman would beat Batman.

Idiotic analogy. You're directly asking people, "Who would you vote for?" in an attempt to predict....who they would vote for. That's not a tough hypothetical.




You know how I know? Because those same polls forgot that he lost the primary by a bigger vote margin than 2016 and because I know white people, independents and anti-trump republicans, that they would not vote for Bernie.

Read the room lil bro. :ufdup:


Seconds ago you said Bernie couldn't win cause you knew Black people, now it's that you know White people, I guess you know everyone. :pachaha:


It's hilarious that we've gone from 2019's "Only White people support Bernie" to "Bernie can't win cause White people would never support him." :skip:



Bernie dominates among independents including in actual elections by the way, so good try there. :mjlol:




And even Republicans become more fond of Bernie the longer they look at him, which is pretty much the opposite of what happens with Biden, so....




 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,153
Reppin
The Deep State
Seconds ago you said Bernie couldn't win cause you knew Black people, now it's that you know White people, I guess you know everyone. :pachaha:

Black people know white people better than themselves. Thats why we don't trust bernie.

It's hilarious that we've gone from 2019's "Only White people support Bernie" to "Bernie can't win cause White people would never support him." :skip:
White progressives can't even get their family to vote democrat, why should we trust them?

Bernie dominates among independents including in actual elections by the way, so good try there. :mjlol:


Those independents that didn't vote for him in the primary, sat home, or voted Trump?

And even Republicans become more fond of Bernie the longer they look at him, which is pretty much the opposite of what happens with Biden, so....

So?





shyt like this is why he lost the primary.

Appealing to white class reductionist bullshyt didn't work.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,905
Reppin
the ether
Those independents that didn't vote for him in the primary, sat home, or voted Trump?

Did you ignore the article? Bernie had a dominant lead among independents in the primaries that allowed independents to vote. He was winning by 50 percentage points or more. You're really, really bad at dealing with objective reality.

Unfortunately, many states don't allow independents to take part in primaries, and in some of the states that do, his huge lead among independents got cancelled out because he lost among dyed-in-the-wool democrats.....who 100% were going to vote for him over Trump in the general.

Notice how when it comes to objective facts, you've lost every argument in this discussion.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,905
Reppin
the ether
And even Republicans become more fond of Bernie the longer they look at him, which is pretty much the opposite of what happens with Biden, so....



So Bernie could actually campaign and it would actually help him, unlike Biden hiding in a basement for the entire general election. :mjlol:



So Bernie would actually build on his already dominate poll leads, instead of pissing them away like Biden did? :skip:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,153
Reppin
The Deep State
Did you ignore the article? Bernie had a dominant lead among independents in the primaries that allowed independents to vote. He was winning by 50 percentage points or more. You're really, really bad at dealing with objective reality.
why did he lose the primaries, son?

Unfortunately, many states don't allow independents to take part in primaries, and in some of the states that do, his huge lead among independents got cancelled out because he lost among dyed-in-the-wool democrats.....who 100% were going to vote for him over Trump in the general.

Notice how when it comes to objective facts, you've lost every argument in this discussion.

he lost the popular vote in the primaries. why did that happen?

Bernie would have lost the general election against Trump in 2020.

You know how I know this?

The anti-trump republicans and independents who lean to the right would rather vote for a moderate like Biden over trump.

You know how I know this?

They did this.
 

Mook

We should all strive to be like Mr. Rogers.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
22,935
Reputation
2,478
Daps
58,607
Reppin
Raleigh
Does anyone what Biden has implemented to stop the rent increases? Bro this is ridiculous. I got this last year in the city, but I already checked and there’s nothing cheaper an hour and an half away outside of the trailer parks!! :damn:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,153
Reppin
The Deep State
So Bernie could actually campaign and it would actually help him, unlike Biden hiding in a basement for the entire general election. :mjlol:



So Bernie would actually build on his already dominate poll leads, instead of pissing them away like Biden did? :skip:
Again, it's a conspiracy when Bernie loses. No accountability. No lessons learned. No reflections or room for improvement.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,905
Reppin
the ether
why did he lose the primaries, son?



he lost the popular vote in the primaries. why did that happen?

Because the establishment Voltroned against him and the party mouthpieces and media incessantly pushed the claim that he couldn't win, even though all objective evidence showed that was untrue.

When asked who they liked more, when asked whose policies they liked more, when asked who they trusted more, primary voters said Bernie. Over and over again, the voters themselves said in the exit polls that the MAIN reason they picked Biden was because they "thought he could win".....but the same voters saying that certainly would have taken Biden over Trump in the general, so why is their opinion on the issue more relevant than the opinion of actual independents and general election voters?




Bernie would have lost the general election against Trump in 2020.

You know how I know this?

The anti-trump republicans and independents who lean to the right would rather vote for a moderate like Biden over trump.

You know how I know this?

They did this.

No they didn't, Biden barely fukking won despite dems have a turnout advantage. :mjlol:

Bernie would have done better with Independents because he DEMONSTRABLY did better with independents in every fukking election and in every fukking poll. The objective evidence is right there, I already posted it. Plus he would have turned out more non-voters because he was far more popular among young people and non-affiliated voters. Biden won the primary solely due to dyed-in-the-wool Democrats, who would still have turned out for the general and still would have picked Bernie over Trump.

You are getting killed here.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,905
Reppin
the ether
Oh so now you're lying about why you mentioned his "massive advantages" by quoting the number of senators he had.

Where did I lie? 59-60 senators is a MASSIVE advantage. Many presidents have transformed the nation with far less.

Your insistence on deflection is amazing. You lied about me claiming a supermajority, then baselessly called me a liar when I point out that I never said anything about a supermajority but gave the exact, correct majority number every time.

Three straight times I've asked the question, and three straight times you've deflected from it. Are you going to answer it or not? Would the permanent continuation of Obama's 1st-term policies (not just legislation but executive policy too) had led to a long-term stabilization of the environment and economy, or not? Would those policies have eventually halted environmental destruction and climate change, ended the reliance on constant-growth economy, and closed the wealth gap, or would all four issues have continued to get worse under such policies?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,153
Reppin
The Deep State
Because the establishment Voltroned against him and the party mouthpieces and media incessantly pushed the claim that he couldn't win, even though all objective evidence showed that was untrue.

More conspiracy.

one second he's a sleeper powerful candidate

the next, he can't handle actual democrats not supporting him

When asked who they liked more, when asked whose policies they liked more, when asked who they trusted more, primary voters said Bernie.

So? Voting based on values is rarely what people do when they value electability more.

Over and over again, the voters themselves said in the exit polls that the MAIN reason they picked Biden was because they "thought he could win"
20dc-biden1-sub3-mediumSquareAt3X.jpg

.....but the same voters saying that certainly would have taken Biden over Trump in the general, so why is their opinion on the issue more relevant than the opinion of actual independents and general election voters?

I literally have no idea what you're arguing here

No they didn't, Biden barely fukking won despite dems have a turnout advantage. :mjlol:


Biden beat an incumbent president. No small feat.

20dc-biden1-sub3-mediumSquareAt3X.jpg


Bernie would have done better with Independents because he DEMONSTRABLY did better with independents in every fukking election and in every fukking poll.
20dc-biden1-sub3-mediumSquareAt3X.jpg


The objective evidence is right there, I already posted it. Plus he would have turned out more non-voters because he was far more popular among young people and non-affiliated voters.






Biden won the primary solely due to dyed-in-the-wool Democrats, who would still have turned out for the general and still would have picked Bernie over Trump.

You are getting killed here.

Did you just say Biden won because of democrats?

Holy shyt.

Thats...golden :banderas:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,153
Reppin
The Deep State
Where did I lie? 59-60 senators is a MASSIVE advantage. Many presidents have transformed the nation with far less.

Your insistence on deflection is amazing. You lied about me claiming a supermajority, then baselessly called me a liar when I point out that I never said anything about a supermajority but gave the exact, correct majority number every time.

Obama was supposed to change the world in 2 years while he lost the house and senate in 2010 for a 60 day supermajority during unprecedented times?

Three straight times I've asked the question, and three straight times you've deflected from it. Are you going to answer it or not? Would the permanent continuation of Obama's 1st-term policies (not just legislation but executive policy too) had led to a long-term stabilization of the environment and economy, or not? Would those policies have eventually halted environmental destruction and climate change, ended the reliance on constant-growth economy, and closed the wealth gap, or would all four issues have continued to get worse under such policies?

This is a stupid question.

Anything obama did was objectively good.
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

Drink wolf cola
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
31,993
Reputation
9,779
Daps
107,441
Reppin
Brooklyn
Where did I lie? 59-60 senators is a MASSIVE advantage. Many presidents have transformed the nation with far less.

Your insistence on deflection is amazing. You lied about me claiming a supermajority, then baselessly called me a liar when I point out that I never said anything about a supermajority but gave the exact, correct majority number every time.

Three straight times I've asked the question, and three straight times you've deflected from it. Are you going to answer it or not? Would the permanent continuation of Obama's 1st-term policies (not just legislation but executive policy too) had led to a long-term stabilization of the environment and economy, or not? Would those policies have eventually halted environmental destruction and climate change, ended the reliance on constant-growth economy, and closed the wealth gap, or would all four issues have continued to get worse under such policies?
You’re arguing with a guy who has 5 worst poster of the year awards to my knowledge. He’s in all likelihood a paid dnc shill given that his arguments are identical to said shills on Twitter. He’s been arguing in bad faith about sanders since 2016 at the very least. Best thing to do with napoleon is to block and move on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top