WHY DIDNT OBAMA SAVE US!!!
nikka, WHAT?!
nikka, WHAT?!
Bernie dominated hypothetical polls. Who would even honestly respect those poll results? The primary wasn't over yet. It's a hypothetical match up. Thats like asking if Superman would beat Batman.
You know how I know? Because those same polls forgot that he lost the primary by a bigger vote margin than 2016 and because I know white people, independents and anti-trump republicans, that they would not vote for Bernie.
Read the room lil bro.
Seconds ago you said Bernie couldn't win cause you knew Black people, now it's that you know White people, I guess you know everyone.
White progressives can't even get their family to vote democrat, why should we trust them?It's hilarious that we've gone from 2019's "Only White people support Bernie" to "Bernie can't win cause White people would never support him."
Bernie dominates among independents including in actual elections by the way, so good try there.
Why Sanders Does Better With Independents
During the 2004 presidential primaries, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean made headlines by asserting that he represented the “Democratic wing of the Democratic P…fivethirtyeight.com
And even Republicans become more fond of Bernie the longer they look at him, which is pretty much the opposite of what happens with Biden, so....
Bernie Sanders draws enthusiastic cheers in surprising Fox News town hall
The setup looked potentially hostile but became a free, hourlong commercial for the Sanders candidacy, broadcast to Fox viewerswww.theguardian.com
Bernie Sanders Just Gave His Best Campaign Speech Yet—On Fox News
Sanders took on his so-called radical reputation with precision and humor.www.vogue.com
Those independents that didn't vote for him in the primary, sat home, or voted Trump?
And even Republicans become more fond of Bernie the longer they look at him, which is pretty much the opposite of what happens with Biden, so....
why did he lose the primaries, son?Did you ignore the article? Bernie had a dominant lead among independents in the primaries that allowed independents to vote. He was winning by 50 percentage points or more. You're really, really bad at dealing with objective reality.
Unfortunately, many states don't allow independents to take part in primaries, and in some of the states that do, his huge lead among independents got cancelled out because he lost among dyed-in-the-wool democrats.....who 100% were going to vote for him over Trump in the general.
Notice how when it comes to objective facts, you've lost every argument in this discussion.
Again, it's a conspiracy when Bernie loses. No accountability. No lessons learned. No reflections or room for improvement.So Bernie could actually campaign and it would actually help him, unlike Biden hiding in a basement for the entire general election.
So Bernie would actually build on his already dominate poll leads, instead of pissing them away like Biden did?
why did he lose the primaries, son?
he lost the popular vote in the primaries. why did that happen?
Bernie would have lost the general election against Trump in 2020.
You know how I know this?
The anti-trump republicans and independents who lean to the right would rather vote for a moderate like Biden over trump.
You know how I know this?
They did this.
Oh so now you're lying about why you mentioned his "massive advantages" by quoting the number of senators he had.
Because the establishment Voltroned against him and the party mouthpieces and media incessantly pushed the claim that he couldn't win, even though all objective evidence showed that was untrue.
When asked who they liked more, when asked whose policies they liked more, when asked who they trusted more, primary voters said Bernie.
Over and over again, the voters themselves said in the exit polls that the MAIN reason they picked Biden was because they "thought he could win"
.....but the same voters saying that certainly would have taken Biden over Trump in the general, so why is their opinion on the issue more relevant than the opinion of actual independents and general election voters?
No they didn't, Biden barely fukking won despite dems have a turnout advantage.
Bernie would have done better with Independents because he DEMONSTRABLY did better with independents in every fukking election and in every fukking poll.
The objective evidence is right there, I already posted it. Plus he would have turned out more non-voters because he was far more popular among young people and non-affiliated voters.
Biden won the primary solely due to dyed-in-the-wool Democrats, who would still have turned out for the general and still would have picked Bernie over Trump.
You are getting killed here.
Where did I lie? 59-60 senators is a MASSIVE advantage. Many presidents have transformed the nation with far less.
Your insistence on deflection is amazing. You lied about me claiming a supermajority, then baselessly called me a liar when I point out that I never said anything about a supermajority but gave the exact, correct majority number every time.
Three straight times I've asked the question, and three straight times you've deflected from it. Are you going to answer it or not? Would the permanent continuation of Obama's 1st-term policies (not just legislation but executive policy too) had led to a long-term stabilization of the environment and economy, or not? Would those policies have eventually halted environmental destruction and climate change, ended the reliance on constant-growth economy, and closed the wealth gap, or would all four issues have continued to get worse under such policies?
You’re arguing with a guy who has 5 worst poster of the year awards to my knowledge. He’s in all likelihood a paid dnc shill given that his arguments are identical to said shills on Twitter. He’s been arguing in bad faith about sanders since 2016 at the very least. Best thing to do with napoleon is to block and move on.Where did I lie? 59-60 senators is a MASSIVE advantage. Many presidents have transformed the nation with far less.
Your insistence on deflection is amazing. You lied about me claiming a supermajority, then baselessly called me a liar when I point out that I never said anything about a supermajority but gave the exact, correct majority number every time.
Three straight times I've asked the question, and three straight times you've deflected from it. Are you going to answer it or not? Would the permanent continuation of Obama's 1st-term policies (not just legislation but executive policy too) had led to a long-term stabilization of the environment and economy, or not? Would those policies have eventually halted environmental destruction and climate change, ended the reliance on constant-growth economy, and closed the wealth gap, or would all four issues have continued to get worse under such policies?
... I'm afraid to ask who you think who was voting for him, if not democrats. Please don't say "anti-Trump republicans."Did you just say Biden won because of democrats?
Holy shyt.
Thats...golden