The Last of Us reviews are dropping

[Grand Conde]

^^^^ Dunno why these MS stan are so angry, its a good game, accept it and move on please.

 

[Lord Beasley]

game is a hit...

i went in the SoD thread asking why they charging 16hunna pts (20$) for it and nikkas caught feelings

 

[Lord Beasley]

Sessler da GAWD () gave it a 5/5.

 

[Fatboi1]

or maybe the PStans will post that review and gloat all over it by claiming it's bias and not credible

Jes stahp pleez.

It's clearly fishing for hits.

 

[Fatboi1]

 

[FlyRy]

i'm already from this game and i've yet to smell the shrink wrap

 

[duncanthetall]

Bout to be GOTG

 

[Fatboi1]

Feb.20th was the nail in the cross.

 

[daze23]

Jes stahp pleez.

It's clearly fishing for hits.

so any review that's less than a perfect score is "clearly fishing for hits"?

 

[Fatboi1]

so any review that's less than a perfect score is "clearly fishing for hits"?

Do people not focus on the negative more so than the positive?? Stop being disingenuous and realize that people don't read reviews, they look at the scores and go off of that. I can bet without even searching online, that review sites that score a game much lower than others will get a lot of hits and comments because of it being different. Hell when I heard Gamespot gave the latest Zelda a 7.5, I went to their site and I hardly ever type in Gamespot.

In this case, Polygon surely will get lots of hits. I also heard they were funded by Microsoft 750k. Kind of makes you wonder.

The Neogaf thread despite all the glowing scores, seem to be full of people talking about Polygon. Whether it's intentional or not, it will garner a lot of attention, positive or negative regardless to their site. Me personally, it doesn't affect my purchasing decision as one lower review from the general consensus doesn't make me think twice when everyone else is raving over it.
Why are you even linking/posting reviews for the PS3 game, I thought you only PC gamed? ?Bro do you even lift?

 

[daze23]

Do people not focus on the negative more so than the positive?? Stop being disingenuous and realize that people don't read reviews, they look at the scores and go off of that. I can bet without even searching online, that review sites that score a game much lower than others will get a lot of hits and comments because of it being different. Hell when I heard Gamespot gave the latest Zelda a 7.5, I went to their site and I hardly ever type in Gamespot.

In this case, Polygon surely will get lots of hits. The Neogaf thread despite all the glowing scores, seem to be full of people talking about Polygon. Whether it's intentional or not, it will garner a lot of attention, positive or negative regardless to their site. Me personally, it doesn't affect my purchasing decision as one lower review from the general consensus doesn't make me think twice when everyone else is raving over it.
Why are you even linking/posting reviews for the PS3 game, I thought you only PC gamed? ?Bro do you even lift?

how is it not inevitable though? it's like the moment anyone goes against the grain (in this case, anything less than a 'perfect' score), they're gonna be accused of having some sort of ulterior motive

 

[↓R↑LYB]

We made it brehs

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sKcZDU2RMo[/ame]

 

[Rekkapryde]

We made it brehs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sKcZDU2RMo

 

[Bud Bundy]

Sessler gave this a 5/5 that is good enough for me.

 

[Fatboi1]

how is it not inevitable though? it's like the moment anyone goes against the grain (in this case, anything less than a 'perfect' score), they're gonna be accused of having some sort of ulterior motive

That's just gamer nature.
Nobody will ever know..