You wouldn’t entertain this argument when nikkas try to prop up Steph v Lebron so why be disingenuous. The accolades/stats and all that other shyt apply in the KD v Jimmy situation like it would for Bron v Steph.
Why wouldn't I?
Steph has now extended his prime into a solid decade, which is elite longevity on a historical level. Most NBA players don't have 10-year primes, let alone longer than that. He's the consensus second greatest player of whatever era you wanna call the LeBron era, because he's better than Kobe was. As that second greatest player, he warrants comparison to LeBron...
So saying I wouldn't entertain it is false. He's not better than LeBron. But LeBron vs Steph is a thing because Steph is better than LeBron fir the last three years and their career arcs have overlapped...
Jimmy isn't historically better than Durant in the same vein. But he's a better player than Durant now, probably has been the last 3-4 years given Durant has only averaged 47 games played per season since returning from injury. And when you take the run Jimmy's been on the last 4 years and compare it to Durant's career, yes Durant has been better but the one huge differentiator is Durant's career is accentuated by joining an All-Time dynastic team. Look at Durant's 13-year, non-Warrior career and compare
that to Jimmy's 12-year career and I repeat, a gap still exists but it isn't as magnificent as we thought it wouldve been a few years ago...