It's not going by my logic. FSU has played and beaten 4 teams that were ranked when they played them. No other team in the country has done that to this point. Clemson and Notre Dame are still ranked. ND is in the top 10 right now. That's not as pansy of a schedule as you are making it out to be. If they are undefeated at the end of the conference championship games, they are 1 if Miss St. loses or 2 if Miss St. wins out. Plain and simple.They are determined by strength of schedule and who you actually beat
Which is what I'm arguing.
By your logic shouldn't Marshall be in the top 4?
If miss st and auburn both win out, they will put 2 SEC teams in the playoffs
And yet if ND and MSU do, hey have the same resume as auburn and will get nothingIf miss st and auburn both win out, they will put 2 SEC teams in the playoffs
their both going to lose to bama on the road.
Maybe, maybe nottheir both going to lose to bama on the road.
Exactly..people are on crack if they think saban is gonna allow 3losses on this team and TWO at HOMEtheir both going to lose to bama on the road.
Exactly..people are on crack if they think saban is gonna allow 3losses on this team and TWO at HOME
If miss st and auburn both win out, they will put 2 SEC teams in the playoffs
It's not going by my logic. FSU has played and beaten 4 teams that were ranked when they played them. No other team in the country has done that to this point. Clemson and Notre Dame are still ranked. ND is in the top 10 right now. That's not as pansy of a schedule as you are making it out to be. If they are undefeated at the end of the conference championship games, they are 1 if Miss St. loses or 2 if Miss St. wins out. Plain and simple.
http://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/ranking/strength-of-schedule-by-team
A team ranked when you played then is the flimsiest argument there is. If that had any credibility we should get credit for beating Tamu
So you're just gonna ignore the point after that, where I said Clemson and ND are still ranked, and ND is in fact in the top 10?http://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/ranking/strength-of-schedule-by-team
A team ranked when you played then is the flimsiest argument there is. If that had any credibility we should get credit for beating Tamu
http://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/ranking/strength-of-schedule-by-team
A team ranked when you played then is the flimsiest argument there is. If that had any credibility we should get credit for beating Tamu
Was A&M ranked when yall no vaselined them?
So you're just gonna ignore the point after that, where I said Clemson and ND are still ranked, and ND is in fact in the top 10?
I don't think so but, no one is getting credit for beating them and they were once a top 10 team
Beating K.state & Ole miss on the road >>>>>> Clemson and ND at home
Oregon should be higher than FSU too