Still scratching my head
we now see that the Iron Bowl wont determine anything. Ole Miss loss to a team barely in the top 25 and it didnt mean anything.
And if Ole Miss beats Miss St in the Egg Bowl, that loss wont matter either.
The Inaugural College Football Playoff Rankings Official Thread
- Thread starter Illeye buckmatic
- Start date
we now see that the Iron Bowl wont determine anything. Ole Miss loss to a team barely in the top 25 and it didnt mean anything.
And if Ole Miss beats Miss St in the Egg Bowl, that loss wont matter either.
why is it a shytty argument? Had you replaced those 2 top 5 teams with let's say illinois and maryland would LSU have a lost?
Remember gizzle, not all losses are created and looked at equally. That's why OSU is 16th and Sparty is 10th. Sparty had a better loss than OSU. it matters
this aint no playoff its an extension of the BSC, its a one plus one. A REAL playoff takes 8 teams.
5 major conference champions and 3 at large teams.
it aint that fukking hard. It's basic math
it should be this.. I AGREE
Who has OSU beaten this year compared to Ole Miss that has a win against the #6 team. Not to even factor in which team both lost to.
The top 3 are fine, but Oregon should be at the #4 spot.
There is way too much football left, especially with all these SEC teams. But hypothetically, I can see the SEC getting two teams in if Georgia were to run the table along with Miss St. doing the same as well with Georgia beating them. They would give a 1 loss Georgia team the nod over TCU/KSU/MSU
Whyv
Why should ole miss get rewarded for losing last week is my question, especially to LSU
They are going to reset the rankings every week so these rankings don't even fukking matter
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the playoff rankings different from the polls in that those are more based on the previous week vs this which is a totality of the season and resume. I think that unlike the BCS the "losing early being better" won't necessarily be the case, but more who have you beaten and the context of the lose
I can agree with that
Absolut
Legal Bookie
looking at the context of a loss is a slippery ass slope when you are just picking teams on merit. if a teams qb goes down and they lose a game to a mediocre team, that shouldnt factor in one bit. it should just be looked at as a loss to a mediocre ass team. you cant knock a team out who lost at a place like oregon or something for example, because a team lost to arkansas but had a qb injury that game. fukk that. thats the breaks. teams in every other league dont get re-do's if a guy gets hurt. if you are sitting around picking and choosing teams objectively, it should be on resume alone, not the context of the losses. wins and losses only. "well team a lost on a hail mary, but this other team lost by 10" type shyt should not even be in discussion. did you lose? ok, who did you lose to? thats all that should be discussed
PortCityProphet
Follow me to the truth
Which is stupid. Why reset every week? The current week should be built upon the previous weeks.
Better win bama @ arky or TOSU @ penn st?
This shyt bout to be fukkery armageddon