The GAWD Zack Snyder Finally Reveals DARKSEID, Explains Cyborgs Arc

[HiiiPower]

Spidey 3 you right....shyt was horrible.

But Spidey 1 and 2 were dope, esp 2. Alfred Molina killed it as Doc Ock

I’ll give you 2, but those films didn’t hold up well at all, watching just the first 10 mins of that video linked will make you realise how cringey damn near everything about that first film is.

I just Think Tom Holland nails it, dude really is Spider-Man in those early years, wait till film 3 once we’re over the whole RIP Tony phase and we’ll be seeing him take on these OP spidey villains like a boss

 

[Rekkapryde]

I’ll give you 2, but those films didn’t hold up well at all, watching just the first 10 mins of that video linked will make you realise how cringey damn near everything about that first film is.

I just Think Tom Holland nails it, dude really is Spider-Man in those early years, wait till film 3 once we’re over the whole RIP Tony phase and we’ll be seeing him take on these OP spidey villains like a boss

for the "young/early" Spidey angle, Holland is cool. Garfield was still the best overall IMO. Too bad his movies weren't as good.

But Spidey 2 is one of the best superhero movies ever. Even Spidey 1....Willem Dafoe beasted as the Goblin.

 

[Won Won]

So now the teenage edgelord posts are a “gimmick”

You Snyder/DC stans are embarrassingly disingenuous

 

[HiiiPower]

for the "young/early" Spidey angle, Holland is cool. Garfield was still the best overall IMO. Too bad his movies weren't as good.

But Spidey 2 is one of the best superhero movies ever. Even Spidey 1....Willem Dafoe beasted as the Goblin.

I always wonder how salty Garfield has to be, not only were his films weak but they pretty much through him in the garbage soon as the marvel/Sony deal was announced

 

[PlayerNinety_Nine]

lol...

I guess you right...I still think Snyder was the guy. Him and the studio bumping heads is why we got the horseshyt we got. Watchmen was a good borderline great comicbook movie, so it's not like he wasn't capable.

The difference is, he lifted damn near every shot from Watchmen and 300 directly from the books.

With the DC movies - he started making his own stories, strip mining the best bits from storylines that could have been 'event flicks' in their own right and passing it off as fan service.

To see what Snyder gets up to when left to his own devices, watch 'Sucker Punch'

"It's technically impressive and loaded with eye-catching images, but without characters or a plot to support them, all of Sucker Punch's visual thrills are for naught.

That's Snyder to me, in a nutshell.

 

[Bleed The Freak]

Why is this overlooked when people continue to rally around Snyder’s wack-ass conceptualization for Justice League?

There are more than enough planetary-threat-level villains in the DCU to have avoided rolling out Darkseid too early, while still presenting a credible threat worthy of forming the Justice League. It could be argued DC actually has more of those types of villains than Marvel.

Meanwhile, the only reason fans accepted Steppenwolf as a credible threat was because of Darkseid (that doesn’t mean he isn’t credible, power-wise... it means who gives a fukk about Stepenwolf?).

Brainiac immediately springs to mind. Especially since MoS kick-started their attempt at a shared universe. But since you could argue that Braniac is AS big a threat as Darkseid, you could also argue for Black Adam (oh hey, I heard they casted some guy named The Rock to play that guy... no way he’s charismatic enough to hold it down as the main bad guy ), Vandal Savage, Amazo, the fukking Anti-Monitor (probably a Phase 3 villain), Prometheus, Rhas Al Ghul, Brother Eye + OMACs, Despero... Mongul!

But nope. We were gonna get an Act II Darkseid reveal. That makes sense.

Couldn't have said it better.

fukk kind of shyt is that!?! It was like when Fox tried to make a quick Apoclayspe buck instead of building him up with Sinister and his horsemen over a few years.

 

[Rekkapryde]

The difference is, he lifted damn near every shot from Watchmen and 300 directly from the books.

With the DC movies - he started making his own stories, strip mining the best bits from storylines that could have been 'event flicks' in their own right and passing it off as fan service.

To see what Snyder gets up to when left to his own devices, watch 'Sucker Punch'



That's Snyder to me, in a nutshell.

Man of Steel though

 

[Rekkapryde]

I always wonder how salty Garfield has to be, not only were his films weak but they pretty much through him in the garbage soon as the marvel/Sony deal was announced

It is what it is. But he was perfect as Pete/Spidey. Nailed it.

 

[Vandelay]

The difference is, he lifted damn near every shot from Watchmen and 300 directly from the books.

With the DC movies - he started making his own stories, strip mining the best bits from storylines that could have been 'event flicks' in their own right and passing it off as fan service.

To see what Snyder gets up to when left to his own devices, watch 'Sucker Punch'



That's Snyder to me, in a nutshell.

Never read Watchmen so I wouldn't know.

But does he write the stories he directs? I know he had creative authority and executive decision but I'm curious about that.

I just his visuals paired to the right script should've been the perfect marriage of comic to cinema.

 

[parallax]

for the "young/early" Spidey angle, Holland is cool. Garfield was still the best overall IMO. Too bad his movies weren't as good.

But Spidey 2 is one of the best superhero movies ever. Even Spidey 1....Willem Dafoe beasted as the Goblin.

Although I didn't like spider Man 1, defoe was the best thing about it.

 

[invincible1914]

Man

ONCE AGAIN... fukk warner bros as a studio, label, and a motherfuccin crew... p*ssy ass craccas. p*ssy ass old ass relics who care about money than giving creators their due.. fukk them all

filmed all these amazing Cyborg scenes, him being the emotional tether to the entire film and they cut it all.. fuccin hack whedon pretty much reshot the ENTIRE film. nah fucc them

free DC.. Make DC a separate studio

Everything Snyder does looks awesome in pics. I wish that he would ever evolve past being good at visuals only. Cause dude struggles hard with that other stuff. He really needs to back to doing more grounded stuff like Dawn of the Dead for a bit.

 

[verbalkint]

I always wonder how salty Garfield has to be, not only were his films weak but they pretty much through him in the garbage soon as the marvel/Sony deal was announced

His own shenanigans got him booted. He might've possibly made the crossover but he was pissing off execs and missing publicity dates.

 

[Still FloW]

why the fukk would you spend money to do another version of a film that's not only considered a failure, but a film/direction the studio is actively trying to distance itself from (to mostly positive and critically praised results, so far)??

how the fukk does this become about keeping the black man out of a prominent film role when zack snyder was given the keys to the DCU kingdom, allowed to do whatever the hell he wanted (a superman that kills and a batman that BLATANTLY kills)... AND fukkED IT ALL UP??



yeah, let's recast batman, relaunch suicide squad, do a joker origin film, set up shop for wonder woman, aquaman and shazam sequels... and dredge up that trash-ass justice league film. good call!

i will never understand the zack snyder obsession. the ideas/hard sell/visuals are ALWAYS better than the finished product (with one or two very clear exceptions).

would i be curious to see a snyder cut? sure.

do i give 3/5's of a fukk if it ever sees the light of day? nope.

the most cherished superman flick crushed zods hand took his powers and tossed him into an icy prison where he presumably died but nah you right supes is some goody goody boy scout

Keatons batman strapping bombs to nikkas and tossing them to the bushes..

but you're right brehh... you got it

fuccin dumbass..

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

anyone who fukks with Marvel/DC comics wouldn’t be calling Zack Snyder a fukking god

i dunno about a god but Watchmen and Man of Steel were both great so

 

[Woodrow]

the most cherished superman flick crushed zods hand took his powers and tossed him into an icy prison where he presumably died but nah you right supes is some goody goody boy scout

Keatons batman strapping bombs to nikkas and tossing them to the bushes..

but you're right brehh... you got it

fuccin dumbass..

yeah. breaking the bad guy's hand while he's gloating, and "presumably died" are exactly the same as snapping someone's neck. what was i thinking.

yeah. strapping a candy-cane colored time bomb on a goon and tossing him to the bushes is exactly the same as blatantly making kills onscreen.

let's also pretend that (despite being arguably the best batman film ever made) the sequel wasnt largely criticized for its much darker tone, and almost entirely responsible for the more campy/crappy tone chosen for the sequels. let's also pretend that fans never criticized batman 89 and its sequel for depicting a batman that kills when "batman doesnt kill" is a core part of the character's makeup. and most importantly, let's pretend we dont understand that fans were willing to look the other way because, despite some decisions that go against who batman is as a character, overall THE FIRST TWO FILMS ARE fukkING BRILLIANT AND EARNED THEIR INTERPRETATION OF THE CHARACTER.

can BvS or Justice League say the same?

i dont even know why i replied to you to begin with. the fact you think superman isn't a goody goody boy scout says more about your knowledge of these characters (or lack thereof) than any argument i can make.

insult me all you want. you still dont know what the fukk you're talking about you clown.