At first, Final Destination 5 felt like a waste of time.
How does a bridge crumple like paper with no real concrete (pun intended) evidence given? Why's there so much dialogue? Where's the gory deaths? Candyman appearance; cool, but why is the movie taking itself so serious? Killing someone else will take your death place, okay. The black guy's actually going to make it. Those were my random thoughts throughout the flick.
All that change, when the two couples got on Flight 180, and you saw the tie-in to the first Final Destination. I sat up for a good minute like
They got me good. It also redeemed what otherwise was a shytty movie. Now, I have to rewatch to see, if I could pick up on the clues that explains it being a prequel to the original.
Final Destination 1 and 3 are my favorites from the franchise.
How does a bridge crumple like paper with no real concrete (pun intended) evidence given? Why's there so much dialogue? Where's the gory deaths? Candyman appearance; cool, but why is the movie taking itself so serious? Killing someone else will take your death place, okay. The black guy's actually going to make it. Those were my random thoughts throughout the flick.
All that change, when the two couples got on Flight 180, and you saw the tie-in to the first Final Destination. I sat up for a good minute like
They got me good. It also redeemed what otherwise was a shytty movie. Now, I have to rewatch to see, if I could pick up on the clues that explains it being a prequel to the original.
Final Destination 1 and 3 are my favorites from the franchise.