The Fall Of The Media: Trump/Russia Sympathizers Thread UPDATE(5/11)NO EVIDENCE OF RUSSIA COLLUSION!
- Thread starter KingJudah2
- Start date
b_low_brown
Daddyface
b_low_brown
Daddyface
I TRIED TO WARN YALL ABOUT THE SCOPE OF THIS FAKE NEWS AND YALL NEGGED ME. TODAY, I AM VINDICATED AND NOT EVEN THE HOLY NEG FROM GOD HIMSELF WILL STOP THIS
Outlaw
New Hope For the HaveNotz
c00n
Fail.
Just because you know how to use Boolean search methods in Google, that doesn't mean that the results in your search support your point
It was stated several times, and clarified in yesterday's hearing by Clapper, that Russian interference in the US election was determined by only three intelligence agencies: the FBI, CIA, and NSA. All three concluded this with high confidence.
The fact that all 17 intelligence agencies haven't lended support to this conclusion in no way means that the conclusion is either false or dubious. Many of these agencies' specific focus prevent them from making such determinations (like the DEA, Dept. of the Treasury, DOE, NGIA, or the Office of Naval Intelligence
) You could argue that the State Dept. should have been involved in that determination, but the top three IC agencies (along with the Office of the DNI) would be the best-equipped agencies to handle this issue. :kanyebp:
Also, I'd like to point out that the top results of the 3490 "fake news" stories are from Breitbart and RT
b_low_brown
Daddyface
@The Black Panther youre an idiot. It's not
Claiming the story is false because only 3 agencies spoke up. ITS SAYING THE NEWS WAS RUNNING STORIES SAYING 17 WERE INVOLVED WHEN THAT WAS FACTUALLY INNACCURATE. Get your reading comprehension up before ironing your cape.
Claiming the story is false because only 3 agencies spoke up. ITS SAYING THE NEWS WAS RUNNING STORIES SAYING 17 WERE INVOLVED WHEN THAT WAS FACTUALLY INNACCURATE. Get your reading comprehension up before ironing your cape.
b_low_brown
Daddyface
YOU ARE AN IDIOT. BREITBART AND RT SOURCED THEIR NEWS FROM TIME, USA TODAY, TWO SOURCES THAT WERE "FACTCHECKED" BY THE LEFT WING POLITIFACT: Clinton, Trump clash on Russia's role in electionAlso, I'd like to point out that the top results of the 3490 "fake news" stories are from Breitbart and RT
ADMIT THE LEFT PUSHED FAKE NEWS OR GET THE fukk OUT OF THIS THREAD
Slow your roll there, pimp.
You're turning into the alternate version of Nap with those bold letters.
Feeling a little triggered, snowflake? :stephena1:
Politifact said:
Not all of them made a statement, but none of the 17 agencies dissented from the conclusion of the DNI. :bpumad:
the cac mamba
Veteran
im beyond tired of this bullshyt :deadjay:
if russia hacked voting machines, and changed VOTES, tell me about THAT. not this "hillary was corrupt and they might have exposed that and maybe people changed their minds"
weakest shyt ive ever heard
if russia hacked voting machines, and changed VOTES, tell me about THAT. not this "hillary was corrupt and they might have exposed that and maybe people changed their minds"
weakest shyt ive ever heard
im beyond tired of this bullshyt :deadjay:
if russia hacked voting machines, and changed VOTES, tell me about THAT. not this "hillary was corrupt and they might have exposed that and maybe people changed their minds"
If that were all there was to it, there'd be no story
But hacking voter rolls to target voters' social media isn't "weak".
It's diabolical.
If you're smart enough, you don't have to commit voter fraud.
Information fraud (i.e. "fake news"), at least against public figures, isn't a crime. :kanyebp:
b_low_brown
Daddyface
Meta Reign
I walk the streets like, ''say something, n!gga!''
It's such a fukked up narrative. And people are falling for it. smh.im beyond tired of this bullshyt :deadjay:
if russia hacked voting machines, and changed VOTES, tell me about THAT. not this "hillary was corrupt and they might have exposed that and maybe people changed their minds"
"We didn't collude with Russia! Because we said so!"
The parallels between #TrumpRussia and Watergate are scary.
